Are infants with orofacial clefts at risk for insecure mother-child attachments?

OBJECTIVE: Several risk factors in the early lives of children with clefts are believed to interfere with their development of secure attachments to parents; however, this possibility has rarely been studied empirically. This study compared 12- and 24-month attachment classifications of infants with cleft palate (CP), infants with cleft lip and palate (CLP), and a comparison group of unimpaired infants (COMP). METHOD: Twenty-two CP infants, 24 CLP infants, and 61 matched COMP infants were assessed at 12 and 24 months of age in an urban children's hospital. At both visits, mothers and infants participated in the Strange Situation, which was videotaped and subsequently coded for patterns of attachment behavior. RESULTS: CP infants displayed a lower rate of 12-month attachment security than infants in the CLP or COMP groups. By 24 months, no diagnostic group differences in attachment classification were found. Stable 12- to 24-month attachment classifications were less likely in the CP group (36.3%) than in the COMP (62.3%) group. CP infants who were insecure at 12 months were more likely to become secure by 24 months than were CLP or COMP group infants. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous theory and clinical speculation, the facial appearance of infants with CLP does not appear to affect the early mother-infant relationship adversely. The infancy period is marked by attachment instability for infants with CP, who demonstrated lower-than-expected rates of security at 12 months. However, these problems resolved in nearly all cases by 24 months of age. Most infants with clefts emerged from the first 2 years of life with secure maternal attachments.

Cognitive and psychomotor development of infants with orofacial clefts.

OBJECTIVE: To compare at ages 3, 12, and 24 months the cognitive and psychomotor development of 29 infants with cleft lip and palate (CLP), 28 infants with cleft palate only (CPO), and a demographically matched comparison (COMP) group of 69 infants; to examine predictors of cognitive status at age 24 months in the cleft group. METHODS: Infants were administered the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID), mother-infant interactions were observed, and medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: CLP and CPO groups scored lower than the COMP group on the BSID, but did not differ from one another. Cleft group infants scored lower than COMP group infants on BSID items assessing nonverbal and expressive language skills. Quality of maternal interaction predicted the 2-year Mental Development Index (MDI) scores of infants with clefts. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with clefts show relative deficits in cognitive and psychomotor development. Cognitive deficits are apparent in nonverbal as well as verbal areas of performance.

Psychosocial adjustment in twin pairs with and without hemifacial microsomia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the psychosocial adjustment of children with and without hemifacial microsomia (HFM). DESIGN: This cross-sectional pilot study investigated psychosocial adjustment of twin pairs in which one twin was affected with HFM and the other was unimpaired. Data were analyzed using paired t tests. SETTING: The dental medicine clinic of a large urban children's hospital, serving a multistate area. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were six twin pairs aged 9 to 15 years and their parents. Data were also collected from classroom teachers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included: the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), the Teacher Report Form (TRF), the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (SEI), and a structured self-concept interview (the Self-Interview). RESULTS: Children with HFM had significantly higher CBCL and TRF total behavior problem scores and lower SEI general self-esteem scores than their unimpaired twins. No differences were found in CBCL competence scores. Interview data revealed concerns among the HFM group related to appearance, negative social responses, and fear of hospital procedures. Children also reported positive aspects of coping with HFM. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that, similar to other craniofacial conditions, HFM is associated with an elevated risk for childhood psychosocial difficulties. Replication of specific findings with a larger sample is needed. Multicenter, collaborative studies are a crucial next step for this field.