Real-world incidence of venetoclax toxicities in British Columbia.

INTRODUCTION: Venetoclax is used to treat relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (r/r CLL). Tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) is a serious toxicity associated with venetoclax, and real-world studies suggest that the incidence may be higher than in clinical trials. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence of venetoclax toxicities in British Columbia (BC). METHODS: Retrospective review of electronic medical charts for patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients treated with venetoclax for r/r CLL in BC. Patients were classified according to their risk for developing TLS. The incidence of TLS was categorized based on laboratory metrics or clinical diagnosis. Other non-TLS toxicities were also collected. RESULTS: Of 33 patients identified, 40%, 33%, and 27% were at low, intermediate, and high risk for TLS, respectively. Laboratory TLS occurred in 1/33 patients (3%), and no clinical TLS was reported. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred in 19/33 patients (58%). Of these, neutropenia was the most common, occurring in 16 patients (84%) followed by thrombocytopenia, which occurred in 8 patients (42%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TLS in patients treated with venetoclax for r/r CLL in BC was lower than in other real-world studies. Findings may warrant further investigation to determine if the higher incidence of TLS in real-world reports may be mitigated through modifying TLS risk categorization and associated prophylactic measures. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or 4 venetoclax toxicity reported, and the incidence in BC is comparable to other centres.

Evaluation of the role of pharmacy technicians in reviewing the eligibility for Oncotype DX genomic test and the impact of the test on treatment plans in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The Oncotype DX genomic test is a treatment decision-making tool. Test results are presented as recurrence scores which are used to help decide between adjuvant hormonal therapy (low recurrence score) or chemotherapy (high recurrence score). Since 2014, the Oncotype DX test has been funded at the cancer treatment centres in our province for patients with early breast cancer. Eligibility criteria for funding include patient and tumour characteristics. Pharmacy technicians were assigned to review and approve requests based on the eligibility criteria and with access to consultation to an oncology pharmacist and a medical oncologist. We assessed the clinical role of pharmacy technicians in this review process and the impact of recurrence score on treatment decisions. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multi-centre study to evaluate the Oncotype DX test eligibility review process from June 2014 to May 2015. The main objectives were to assess (1) the discrepancy rate of approval by the pharmacy technicians in this review process and (2) the concordance rate between the recurrence score from the Oncotype DX test and the adjuvant treatment given. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty requests for Oncotype DX test were received during the study period. A total of 90.8% of requests were approved and 9.2% were denied. The discrepancy rate of approval by pharmacy technicians was 1.1%. The average review time was 13.8 min, with the reviewing pharmacist and oncologist consulted in 5.5 and 15.2% of the requests, respectively. The concordance rate between the recurrence score and given treatment was 96%. DISCUSSION: The discrepancy rate of our pharmacy technicians appears to be similar to that reported with other expanded technician roles in literature, suggesting that the current task and other similar clinical tasks can be reliably delegated to technicians. The concordance rate of the recurrence score and given treatment in our study was higher than what has been reported in literature, suggesting that most of our patients were treated in accordance to recurrence score-based recommendations. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy technicians were able to expand their clinical role by accurately reviewing the Oncotype DX test requests with a low discrepancy rate. The Oncotype DX test results appeared to successfully guide the adjuvant treatment given to patients in accordance to recurrence score-based recommendations.

Clinical effectiveness of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent brain tumours: A population-based evaluation.

Background Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic agent active in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. However, evidence for its clinical efficacy is relatively limited so that bevacizumab is approved for this indication in Canada and the United States, but not in the European Union. We reviewed the effectiveness of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent brain tumour using a large population database. Methods This was a retrospective, multicentre, study conducted at the BC Cancer Agency, a public cancer care organisation for the residents of the Canadian province of British Columbia. Cases were identified from the provincial registry and drug database. Patients were eligible if they were treated with bevacizumab with or without lomustine or etoposide for recurrent brain tumour between April 2011 and March 2014. The primary end points were progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and objective response rate. Results A total of 160 patients were included, with a median age of 55 years. The most common diagnosis was glioblastoma multiforme (70.6%), followed by oligodendroglioma (10.6%). Half of the patients had prior metronomic dosing of temozolomide. The median duration of therapy was 3 months. The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months and the 6-month progression-free survival was 29.4%. The median overall survival was 7 months and the 9-month and 12-month overall survival was 28.1% and 20.6%, respectively. The objective response rate was 23.1%. The most common documented reason for bevacizumab discontinuation was disease progression (66.9%), followed by toxicity (6.9%). Conclusions Bevacizumab therapy seems to be effective in delaying disease progression in patients with recurrent brain tumour, but with limited benefits on the overall survival, when used outside the clinical trial setting.