Educating anesthesia residents to obtain and document informed consent for epidural labor analgesia: does simulation play a role?

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is required before placing an epidural. At our hospital, teaching of residents about this is done informally at the bedside. This study aimed to assess the ability of anesthesia residents to acquire and retain knowledge required when seeking informed consent for epidural labor analgesia. It assessed how well this knowledge was translated to clinical ability, by assessing the verbal consent process during an interaction with a standardized patient. METHODS: Twenty anesthesia residents were randomized to a 'didactic group' or a 'simulation group'. Each resident was presented with a written scenario and asked to document the informed consent process, as they normally would do (pre-test). The didactic group then had a presentation about informed consent, while the simulation group members interviewed a simulated patient, the scenarios focusing on different aspects of consent. All residents then read a scenario and documented their informed consent process (post-test). Six weeks later all residents interviewed a standardized patient in labor and documented the consent from this interaction (six-week test). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the baseline performance of the two groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in their written consent documentation at the immediate time point, the improvement in the didactic group being greater. The didactic group performed better at both the immediate time point and the six-week time point. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study, a didactic teaching method proved better than simulation-based teaching in helping residents to gain knowledge needed to obtain informed consent for epidural labor analgesia.

Onset of labour epidural analgesia with low-dose bupivacaine and different doses of fentanyl.

This study investigated the effects of different doses of epidural fentanyl on the time to onset of epidural analgesia in women in early labour. We hypothesised that onset of epidural labour analgesia (the primary outcome defined as time in minutes from completion of epidural bolus to the first uterine contraction with a numeric pain rating scale [NPRS] score ≤ 3) would be faster with 100 µg of fentanyl epidural bolus compared with 20 µg or 50 µg. Epidural labour analgesia was initiated with 20 µg of fentanyl (F20 group), 50 µg (F50 group) or 100 µg (F100 group) along with 10 ml bupivacaine 0.08% as the loading dose. We randomly allocated 105 patients, with 35 patients in each group. Median (IQR [range]) time to achieve NPRS ≤ 3 was 18 (11-30 [6-20]) min in F20, 10 (8-19 [4-30]) min in F50 and 10 (6-16 [3-30]) min in F100 groups. There was a significant difference in onset times comparing F100 with F20 (p < 0.001) and F50 with F20 (p = 0.007), but not significantly different comparing F100 with F50 (p = 0.19). The median (IQR [range]) time from the epidural loading dose to first patient controlled epidural analgesia bolus was 61 min (20-165 [20-420]) in F20, 118 min (66-176 [20-396]) in F50 and 150 min (66-214 [30-764]) in F100 groups. This was not statistically significant (p = 0.16) comparing the F20 with the F100 group. There were no significant differences in maternal side-effects, mode of delivery, patient satisfaction scores or neonatal Apgar scores between all groups. We conclude that the 50 µg and 100 µg fentanyl doses were associated with reduced onset times to effective analgesia compared with the 20 µg dose.

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a double-blind, dose-comparison, placebo-controlled randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The analgesic benefit of TAP (transversus abdominis plane) blocks for cesarean delivery pain remains controversial. We compared the analgesic efficacy of two doses of local anesthetic for TAP blocks after cesarean delivery. METHODS: Sixty women having cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided TAP blocks using either high-dose ropivacaine (3mg/kg), low-dose ropivacaine (1.5mg/kg) or placebo. Patients received intrathecal 0.75% bupivacaine 10-12mg, fentanyl 10µg and morphine 150µg and standard multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was the difference in pain with movement using a numeric rating scale at 24h. Other outcomes included time to first request for analgesia, pain scores at 6, 12, 36, 48h and at 6 and 12weeks, opioid consumption, adverse effects, quality of recovery, and satisfaction. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in the primary outcome. Mean ± SD pain scores (0-10) with movement at 24h were: high-dose ropivacaine 3.6±1.5, low-dose ropivacaine 4.6±2.1 and placebo 4.1±1.7. With respect to secondary outcomes, the mean ± SD pain scores at 6h were lower in the high-dose group 2.0±1.8 compared to the low-dose 3.4±2.7 and placebo groups 4.2±2.0 (P=0.009). Pain scores at 12h were also lower in the high-dose group 2.2±2.0 compared to the low-dose group 4.1±2.7 and placebo group 4.0±1.3 (P=0.011). There was no difference in other outcomes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neither high- or low-dose TAP blocks as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen including intrathecal morphine improved pain scores with movement at 24h after cesarean delivery when compared to placebo TAP blocks. High-dose TAP blocks may improve pain scores up to 12h after cesarean delivery.