Impact of new-onset versus pre-existing atrial fibrillation on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement/implantation.

Patients with aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement/transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR/TAVI) experience a high incidence of pre-existing atrial fibrillation (pre-AF) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) post-operatively. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to update current evidence concerning the incidence of 30-day mortality, stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), length of stay (LOS), and early/late bleeding in patients with NOAF or pre-AF who undergo TAVR/TAVI. PubMed, Google Scholar, JSTOR, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2012 and December 2020 reporting the association between NOAF/pre-AF and clinical complications after TAVR/TAVI. A total of 15 studies including 158,220 adult patients with TAVI/TAVR and NOAF or pre-AF were identified. Compared to patients in sinus rhythm, patients who developed NOAF had a higher risk of 30-day mortality, AKI, early bleeding events, extended LOS, and stroke after TAVR/TAVI (odds ratio [OR]: 3.18 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58, 6.40]) (OR: 3.83 [95% CI 1.18, 12.42]) (OR: 1.70 [95% CI 1.05, 2.74]) (OR: 13.96 [95% CI, 6.41, 30.40]) (OR: 2.51 [95% CI 1.59, 3.97], respectively). Compared to patients in sinus rhythm, patients with pre-AF had a higher risk of AKI and early bleeding episodes after TAVR/TAVI (OR: 2.43 [95% CI 1.10, 5.35]) (OR: 17.41 [95% CI 6.49, 46.68], respectively). Atrial fibrillation is associated with a higher risk of all primary and secondary outcomes. Specifically, NOAF but not pre-AF is associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality, stroke, and extended LOS after TAVR/TAVI.

Relationship of Body Mass Index With Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data-STS/ACC TVT Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of body mass index (BMI) with short- and long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The relationship between BMI and baseline characteristics and procedural characteristics was assessed for 31,929 patients who underwent TAVR between November 1, 2011, and March 31, 2015, from the STS/ACC TVT Registry. Registry data on 20,429 patients were linked to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to assess the association of BMI with 30-day and 1-year mortality using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. The effect of BMI on mortality was also assessed with BMI as a continuous variable. Restricted cubic regression splines were used to model the effect of BMI and to determine appropriate cut points of BMI. RESULTS: Among 31,929 patients, 806 (2.5%) were underweight (BMI, <18.5 kg/m2), 10,755 (33.7%) had normal weight (BMI, 18.5- 24.9 kg/m2), 10,691 (33.5%) were overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9 kg/m2), 5582 (17.5%) had class I obesity (BMI, 30.0-34.9 kg/m2), 2363 (7.4%) had class II obesity (BMI, 35.0-39.9 kg/m2), and 1732 (5.4%) had class III obesity (BMI, ≥40 kg/m2). Patients in various BMI categories were different in most baseline and procedural characteristics. On multivariable analysis, compared with normal-weight patients, underweight patients had higher mortality at 30 days and at 1 year after TAVR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.78 and HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.17-1.69, respectively), whereas overweight patients and those with class I and II obesity had a decreased risk of mortality at 1 year (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95, HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.89, and HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98, respectively). For BMI of 30 kg/m2 or less, each 1-kg/m2 increase was associated with a 2% and 4% decrease in the risk of 30-day and 1-year mortality, respectively; for BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, a 1-kg/m2 increase was associated with a 3% increased risk of 30-day mortality but not with 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Results of this large registry study evaluating the relationship of BMI and outcomes after TAVR support the existence of an obesity paradox among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR.

Brugada Pattern in Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Case Report and Scoping Study.

Brugada syndrome is a rare cardiac arrhythmia which is associated with right bundle branch block pattern (RBBB) and ST-segment elevation in right precordial leads. SCNA5 mutation is the most common genetic abnormality associated with Brugada syndrome. Brugada pattern not related to genetic mutations has been previously reported in the setting of fever, metabolic conditions, lithium use, marijuana and cocaine abuse, ischemia and pulmonary embolism, myocardial and pericardial diseases. Multiple isolated cases of Brugada pattern associated with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) have been previously reported. We here present a case of type 1 Brugada pattern in a 23 year-old-male who presented with DKA. Brugada pattern in DKA is attributed to acidosis and multiple electrolyte abnormalities including hyperkalemia which alter ion channel expression in the heart thus leading to Brugada pattern which subsequently resolved with treatment of DKA. In such patients, Brugada pattern is not reproducible on procainamide induction cardiac electrophysiology study (EPS). Our scoping study demonstrates male predominance 20/22 cases of (DELETE this highlighted area) Brugada pattern in DKA, a finding that is consistent with prevalence of this disease among males.

Usefulness of Complement C1q to Predict 10-Year Mortality in Men With Diabetes Mellitus Referred for Coronary Angiography.

The complement system consists of a family of proteins that play a critical role in the innate immune system. Complement activation has been implicated in many chronic inflammatory diseases, including atherosclerosis. However, a number of experimental studies have highlighted a beneficial role of component C1q in early atherosclerosis and in diabetes mellitus (DM). Despite these data, there have been no studies that have specifically examined the utility of plasma complement C1q as a clinical biomarker in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. In this study, baseline plasma complement C1q levels were measured in 159 men with DM who were referred for coronary angiography and who were followed up prospectively for the development of all-cause mortality for 10 years. After adjustment for baseline clinical, angiographic, and laboratory parameters, reduced plasma complement C1q levels were an independent predictor of all-cause mortality at 10 years (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.84, p = 0.0006). In additional multivariate models that adjusted for a variety of biomarkers with established prognostic efficacy, complement C1q remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality at 10 years. In conclusion, reduced levels of complement C1q are associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality at 10 years in patients with DM referred for coronary angiography. Furthermore, this association is independent of a variety of clinical, angiographic, laboratory variables, including biomarkers with established prognostic efficacy in the prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Overview of Impella and mechanical devices in cardiogenic shock.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The Impella (Abiomed Inc.) is an axial flow pump on a pigtail catheter that is placed across the aortic valve to unload the left ventricle by delivering non-pulsatile blood flow to the ascending aorta. It is used for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and CS. AREAS COVERED: Percutaneous mechanical support devices are placed in a minimally invasive manner and provide life-saving assistance. We review Impella and other percutaneous devices such as intra-aortic balloon pump, TandemHeart, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and the evidence supporting their use in the setting of CS. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Impella has been proven to be safe and may be superior to other mechanical support devices in CS.

Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients account for an increasing number of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased residual platelet activity during dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) and DM patients have worse clinical outcomes after PCI as compared to non-DM. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of short duration DAPT (S-DAPT) and long duration DAPT (L-DAPT) after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation in DM and non-DM patients. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of S-DAPT versus L-DAPT after DES implantation in DM and non-DM patients. Efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and composite end point of net adverse clinical events (NACE) (all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, ST, TVR, stroke, major bleeding). Safety endpoints were major bleeding and stroke. Event rates were compared using a forest plot of relative risk using a random effects model. RESULTS: We included eight RCTs that randomized 28,318 patients to S-DAPT versus L-DAPT (8234 DM and 20,084 non-DM). S-DAPT was associated with an increased rate of ST in non-DM patients [3.67 (2.04, 6.59)]. There was no significant difference in the rate of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, ST, MI, TVR, major bleeding, stroke and NACE with S-DAPT and L-DAPT in DM patients [1.19 (0.72-1.95); 1.25 (0.69, 2.25); 1.52 (0.70, 3.29); 1.33 (0.88, 2.01); 1.39 (0.89, 2.17); 0.92 (0.19, 4.42); 0.98 (0.29, 3.28); and 0.94 (0.57, 1.54) respectively]. Further, there was no significant difference in the rate of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, TVR, major bleeding, stroke and NACE with S-DAPT and L-DAPT in non-DM patients [0.93 (0.58, 1.48); 0.75 (0.42, 1.35); 1.52 (0.81, 2.83); 0.99 (0.71, 1.39); 0.72 (0.28, 1.84); 1.01 (0.40, 2.56); and 1.01 (0.77, 1.32) respectively]. CONCLUSION: Compared to L-DAPT, S-DAPT was associated with significant increase in rate of ST in non-DM patients. Duration of DAPT had no significant impact on rates of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, ST and TVR among DM patients.

Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients account for an increasing number of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased residual platelet activity during dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) and DM patients have worse clinical outcomes after PCI as compared to non-DM. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of short duration DAPT (S-DAPT) and long duration DAPT (L-DAPT) after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation in DM and non-DM patients.METHODS:We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of S-DAPT versus L-DAPT after DES implantation in DM and non-DM patients. Efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and composite end point of net adverse clinical events (NACE) (all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, ST, TVR, stroke, major bleeding). Safety endpoints were major bleeding and stroke. Event rates were compared using a forest plot of relative risk using a random effects model...

Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (L-DAPT) compared to short-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (S-DAPT) after drug-eluting stent implantation. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical effect of L-DAPT vs S-DAPT after drug-eluting stent. Efficacy end points were all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Safety end points were TIMI major bleeding and stroke. Event rates were compared using a random-effects model. We identified 11 randomized controlled trials in which 33,520 patients were randomized to S-DAPT (N = 16,687) and L-DAPT (n = 16,833), respectively. Compared with L-DAPT, S-DAPT was associated with higher rate of MI and lower rate of TIMI major bleeding (1.40 [1.08-1.81] and 0.60 [0.41-0.89], respectively), without any significant differences in the rate of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, ST, TVR, and stroke (0.88 [0.75-1.04], 0.98 [0.79-1.22], 1.54 [0.95-2.50], 0.99 [0.73-1.34], and 1.01 [0.78-1.32], respectively). Our results showed that compared with L-DAPT, S-DAPT was associated with higher rate of MI and lower rate of major bleeding without any significant difference in the rates of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, ST, TVR, and stroke.

Usefulness of Plasma Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloproteinase-4 to Predict Death and Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Referred for Coronary Angiography.

TIMP-4 is the newest member of a family of secreted proteins known as the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteases that selectively inhibit matrix metalloproteases. TIMP-4 is abundantly expressed in human cardiovascular structures and has been implicated in cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, it has also been shown to be a novel target of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in rat smooth muscle cells, suggesting a potential role in diabetes mellitus as well. However, there have been no studies that have specifically examined the utility of baseline plasma TIMP-4 levels for the prediction of long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes. In this study, baseline plasma TIMP-4 levels were measured in 162 male patients with diabetes mellitus who were referred for coronary angiography and followed prospectively for the development of all-cause mortality and enzymatically confirmed myocardial infarction (MI) out to 5 years. After adjustment for a variety of baseline clinical, angiographic and laboratory parameters, plasma TIMP-4 levels were an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.60, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.26; p = 0.0082) and MI (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.18; p = 0.0021) at 5 years. Furthermore, in additional multivariate models that adjusted for a variety of biomarkers with established prognostic efficacy, TIMP-4 remained an independent predictor of adverse outcomes. In conclusion, elevated levels of TIMP-4 are associated with an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality and MI in patients with diabetes mellitus referred for coronary angiography. Moreover, this association is independent of a variety of clinical, angiographic, and laboratory variables, including biomarkers with established prognostic efficacy in the prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Cannabis and Myocardial Infarction: Risk Factors and Pathogenetic Insights.

Cannabis use in the US is rising with increased legalization. It has been noted that there is a five-fold increase risk of Myocardial Infarctions (MI) in the first hour after cannabis use. Traditional risk factors for MI include diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia. The rising use of cannabis may have ushered in an additional MI risk factor to be added to the list; that is cannabis. In this review, we discuss the growing use of cannabis and potential link with MI, highlighting the common pathogenic hypotheses linking these risk factors.

Clinical Characteristics and Angiographic Findings of Acute Myocardial Infarction Associated With Marijuana Use: Consecutive Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Marijuana use has been increasingly legalized in the United States resulting in substantial rise in the number of users especially in the younger populations. While our group and others had described various metabolic effects of this drug, little is known about its association with acute myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: To present a series of 8 patients with 10 events of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) associated with marijuana use; highlighting their demographic, clinical presentation, laboratory results and angiographic characteristics. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with STEMI presenting to our inner city hospital Coronary Care Unit over a period of 4 years (December 2013-April 2017). RESULTS: Of the 10 case subjects studied who presented with chest pain, EKG evidence of STEMI with cannabis use, mean age at presentation was 40.1 ± 9.7 (years) SD, ranging from 26 to 59 years old. There were 9 males and one female, of them, 8 were Black, 2 Hispanic and 1 White. Of the 10 cases, 3 (30%) had no known cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (RF) on admission, 1 patient had 3 RF, 4 patients had 2 RF and 2 had 1 CVD RF, which included age, diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and family history of premature coronary heart disease. Troponin I (cTnI) peak mean level was 93.5 ± 34.35 ng/ml, range 7.86 - 358.0 ng/ml. All patients had angiographic evidence of obstructive coronary angiography. CONCLUSION: In our study, marijuana use is associated with ST-elevation MI in largely minority population, occurring at a relatively younger age with half of the cases either low risk or CVD risk free. Additional studies are needed to further characterize this population given the increase in marijuana use.

Clinical Characteristics and Angiographic Findings of Myocardial Infarction among Marijuana Users and Non-Users.

BACKGROUND: Marijuana use has been increasingly legalized in the United States resulting in substantial rise in the number of users especially in the younger populations. While our group and others had described various metabolic effects of this drug, little is known about its association with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). OBJECTIVE: This follow up study presents contemporaneous cohort of non-THC user patients at a single, urban center hospital diagnosed with ST-elevation AMI; highlighting and comparing demographic, clinical, laboratory and angiographic characteristics based on exposure to THC at time of presentation. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with ST-elevation AMI presenting to our inner city hospital Coronary Care Unit over a period of 4 years (December 2013-April 2017). RESULTS: Of the 10 case subjects studied whom presented with chest pain, EKG evidence of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) with cannabis use, mean age at presentation was 40 years old, which was 10 years younger than our control group with no marijuana use (n = 11, p = 0.107). Of the patients who had marijuana exposure upon admission, 3 (30%) had no known cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (RF) on admission, 1 patient had 3 RF, 4 patients had 2 RF and 2 had 1 CVD risk factor, which included age, diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking status, and family history at time of triage. Patients who were negative for marijuana use had higher number of CVD risk factors present upon admission. ASCVD risk scores were 10% vs. 16% (p = 0.312). In angiographic findings, 100% of the marijuana users had 1 vessel disease compared with 55% in the non-users (p = 0.0351). Severity of stenosis for both groups was averaged at 93% for non-users vs 95% in THC users (p = 0.62414). Collateral vessels were visible during coronary arteriogram in 91% of non-THC users and in only 20% of THC users (p = 0.0019). Furthermore, non-users had 35% higher rate of Rentrop grade 1 collaterals (55% vs. 20%, p = 0.4872). Similar difference was shown in grade 2 collaterals between the two groups with non-users having 36% higher rate (36% vs. 0%, p = 0.0902). Amongst the patients who had collateral circulation present at the time of angiography (Rentrop grade >0), good collaterals (Rentrop grade 2 or 3) were present in 40% of non-THC users, while there was 0% presence of grade 2+ collaterals in THC users (p = 0.5152). CONCLUSION: In our study, marijuana use is associated with ST-elevation MI in largely minority population, occurring at a relatively younger age with half of the cases CVD risk free. Additional studies are needed to further characterize this population given the increase in marijuana use.

Safety and efficacy of vorapaxar in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic disease: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

OBJECTIVE: To study the cumulative evidence for vorapaxar use in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized control trials in MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBSCO, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane databases comparing vorapaxar with placebo was performed. Pre-specified efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality, CV mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke and repeat revascularization. The pre-specified safety endpoint was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and a composite of TIMI major and minor bleeding. Risk ratios were used as the metric of choice by applying random effects models. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials with 40,630 patients were included in final analysis. Compared with placebo, vorapaxar led to a statistically non-significant reduction in risk of MI [RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.93, p=0.427] and ischemic stroke [RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.97, p=0.920]. No differences were observed between vorapaxar and placebo with respect to all-cause mortality [RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.90-1.08, p=0.620], cardiovascular mortality [RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.83-1.06, p=0.351], repeat revascularization [RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.82-1.15, p=0.236], and TIMI bleeding [RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.98-1.69, p=0.126]. Vorapaxar was associated with a statistically non-significant higher risk of ICH [RR 2.36; 95% CI 1.40-3.96, p=0.137] compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Addition of Vorapaxar to standard medical therapy in in patients with atherosclerotic disease led to a statistically non-significant reduction in the risk of MI and ischemic stroke at the cost of statistically non-significant increase in risk of ICH.

An Obstructed Anomalous Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Arising from the Right Coronary Artery Requiring Surgical Intervention.

A 47-year-old female presented to our hospital with symptoms of stable angina. Cardiac catheterization revealed a rare coronary artery anomaly of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery branching off the right coronary artery ostium. Furthermore, the anomalous LAD artery exhibited significant atherosclerotic obstruction. Our review of the literature found only nine such previously described cases. Due to the unique nature of coronary artery anomalies and their complications, we would like to contribute our case to the medical literature.

Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

In this systemic review we evaluated the efficacy and safety of long duration dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) (L-DAPT) compared with short duration DAPT (S-DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients who presented with or without acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We identified 8 randomized controlled trials in which 30,975 patients were randomized to S-DAPT versus L-DAPT (12,421 ACS and 18,554 non-ACS). Short duration dual anti-platelet therapy was associated with an increase in target vessel revascularization (TVR) in ACS patients, but the difference was not significant for non-ACS patients (odds ratio [OR] 5.04 [95% CI, 1.28-19.76], and OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.51-1.55], respectively). The risk of cardiac mortality was not significantly different with S-DAPT and L-DAPT for ACS (OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.82-3.50]) and non-ACS patients (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.57-1.37]). For all cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, most of the events were derived from the DAPT study, thus a meta-analysis was not performed for these end points. Based on our review of the literature, we conclude that S-DAPT was associated with higher rates of stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction, and non-significant differences in all-cause mortality, with no significant interactions according to ACS vs non-ACS. However, in non-ACS patients, the benefit-risk profile favored S-DAPT, with lower all-cause mortality, whereas the trends were reversed in ACS. Additional studies are required to determine if the benefit-risk profile of S-DAPT vs L-DAPT varies according to clinical syndrome.

Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after various drug-eluting stent implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of long duration dual anti-platelet therapy i.e., >12months (L-DAPT) and short duration DAPT i.e., ≤12months (S-DAPT) after various drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of L-DAPT versus S-DAPT after sirolimus-eluting (Cypher®); paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus®); zotarolimus-eluting (Endeavor®) and everolimus-eluting stents (Xience V®) implantation. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed comparing two second generation DES and for RCTs comparing S-DAPT and L-DAPT. RESULTS: We included six RCTs that randomized 19,012 patients to S-DAPT versus L-DAPT (4638 in first generation DES; 14,374 in second generation DES; 8099 EES; 4876 in ZES). Compared with L-DAPT, S-DAPT was associated with a higher rate of myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis (ST) after first [2.65 (1.88, 3.73) and 3.85 (2.14-6.93) respectively] and a higher rate of MI after second generation DES [1.33 (1.06, 1.67)]. There were no significant differences in the rates of all cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and stroke with L-DAPT and S-DAPT after implantation of first [0.97 (0.52, 1.81); 1.19 (0.52-2.70); and 1.12 (0.36-3.52) respectively] and second generation DES [0.93 (0.69, 1.25); 0.93 (0.63, 1.36); and 0.58 (0.19, 1.75), respectively]. On further analysis of type of second generation DES, S-DAPT continues to show a higher rate of MI and ST after EES implantation [1.54 (1.11, 2.13) and 2.68 (1.20-5.94) respectively]; however there was no significant difference in the rate of MI and ST with S-DAPT and L-DAPT after ZES implantation [1.07 (0.44, 2.61) and 1.11(0.39, 3.13), respectively]. CONCLUSION: 1) Compared with L-DAPT, S-DAPT was associated with a higher rate of MI without any significant difference in the rate of all cause mortality, CV mortality and stroke after first and second generation DES. 2) Rate of ST was also higher with S-DAPT compared to L-DAPT after first generation DES implantation; however, it was not significantly different after second generation DES. 3) On further subgroup analysis of second-generation stent there was no significant difference in the rate of all cause mortality, CV mortality, MI, ST and stroke with S-DAPT and L-DAPT after ZES implantation. S-DAPT may be optimal for newer generation stents particularly ZES.

Role of Vorapaxar After Coronary Revascularization.

We aim to evaluate the potential benefit and risk of addition of vorapaxar to standard medical therapy in patients who underwent coronary revascularization with either percutaneous coronary revascularization or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and the clinical trial registry maintained at clinicaltrials.gov for randomized control trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of vorapaxar in patients who underwent coronary revascularization procedures with either percutaneous coronary revascularization or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Event rates were compared using a Forest plot of relative risk using a random-effects model. The 5 studies (n = 24,025) that met all criteria were included in the final analysis. After coronary revascularization procedures, addition of vorapaxar to standard medical therapy was associated with reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction (MI; risk ratio 0.83 [0.75 to 0.92]) and ischemic stroke (0.011 [0.007 to 0.016]); however, it also resulted in significant increase risk of hemorrhagic stroke (1.57 [1.01 to 2.44]) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major and minor bleeds (1.36 [1.07 to 1.70]). There was no significant difference in the risk of cardiovascular mortality (0.90 [0.73 to 1.09]), repeat revascularization (0.78 [0.23 to 2.70]), and stent thrombosis (0.95 [0.62 to 1.45]) in the vorapaxar and control groups. In conclusion, after coronary revascularization procedures, addition of vorapaxar to standard medical therapy was associated with reduction in the risk of MI and ischemic stroke and increase in risk of hemorrhagic stroke and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major and minor bleeds.

Usefulness of Plasma Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 Levels to Predict Myocardial Infarction in Men With and Without Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), or stromelysin-1, is a matrix metalloproteinase which is expressed in atherosclerotic plaques and which has been implicated in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Functional polymorphisms in the promoter region of the human MMP-3 gene resulting in an increased expression of MMP-3 have been shown to predict the risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI). However, there have been no studies that have specifically examined the utility of baseline plasma MMP-3 levels for the prediction of long-term MI. In this study, baseline plasma MMP-3 levels were measured in 355 male patients who were referred for coronary angiography and followed prospectively for the development of enzymatically confirmed MI out to 5 years. After adjustment for a variety of baseline clinical, angiographic, and laboratory parameters, plasma MMP-3 levels were an independent predictor of MI at 5 years (hazards ratio 1.42, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.79; p = 0.0023). Furthermore, in 5 additional multivariate models that included a variety of contemporary biomarkers associated with adverse outcomes and MI, MMP-3 remained an independent predictor of MI at 5 years. Similar results were obtained when the analyses were restricted to the subpopulation of patients presenting with ACS. In conclusion, elevated levels of MMP-3 are associated with an increased risk of long-term MI in patients with and without ACS referred for coronary angiography. Furthermore, this association is independent of a variety of clinical, angiographic, laboratory variables, including biomarkers with established prognostic efficacy for the prediction of MI.

Elevated baseline plasma IL-8 levels are an independent predictor of long-term all-cause mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term prognostic significance of baseline plasma IL-8 levels in a group of well-characterized male patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. BACKGROUND: IL-8 is a cytokine that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndrome. Elevated plasma levels have been reported in patients with acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: Baseline plasma IL-8 levels were measured in 180 male patients with acute coronary syndrome who were referred for coronary angiography and followed prospectively for the development of all-cause mortality for 5 years. RESULTS: In a multivariate model that included a wide variety of baseline clinical, laboratory and angiographic parameters in the selection process, baseline plasma IL-8 levels (analyzed as a continuous variable) emerged as a significant predictor of all-cause mortality at 5 years (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.08-1.88; p = 0.0123). Furthermore, in 3 additional multivariate models that also included in the selection process a number of contemporary biomarkers with established prognostic efficacy in ACS (i.e., NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, hemoglobin and RDW), IL-8 remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Elevated baseline plasma levels of IL-8 are associated with an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Furthermore, this association is independent of a variety of clinical, laboratory and angiographic variables, including contemporary biomarkers with established prognostic efficacy in acute coronary syndrome.

Elevated baseline plasma phospholipid protein (PLTP) levels are an independent predictor of long-term all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus and known or suspected coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term prognostic significance of baseline plasma PLTP levels in a group of well-characterized male patients with diabetes mellitus and known or suspected coronary artery disease referred for coronary angiography. BACKGROUND: PLTP is a plasma protein that mediates the net transfer and exchange of phospholipids between lipoproteins. It has been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and elevated plasma levels have been reported in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Baseline plasma PLTP levels were measured in 154 male patients with diabetes mellitus who were referred for coronary angiography and followed prospectively for 5 years for the development of all-cause mortality. RESULTS: After adjustment for a variety of baseline clinical, angiographic and laboratory parameters, plasma PLTP levels (analyzed as a continuous variable) were an independent predictor of all-cause mortality at 5 years (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.22-2.00; P = 0.0009). Furthermore, in 3 additional multivariate models that also included a wide variety of contemporary biomarkers with established prognostic efficacy (i.e., ST2, GDF-15, Cystatin C, Fibrinogen, and NT-proBNP), PLTP remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated baseline plasma levels of PLTP are associated with an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes and known or suspected coronary disease. Furthermore, this association is independent of a variety of clinical, angiographic, and laboratory variables, including a whole host of contemporary biomarkers with established prognostic efficacy.