Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 21(30): 9150-5, 2015 Aug 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26290642

RESUMO

AIM: To determine the impact of a clinical pathway (CP) on acute pancreatitis (AP) treatment outcome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed. We compared the results of AP treatment outcome over two time periods in our centre, before (2006-2007) and after (2010-2012) the implementation of a CP. The CP comprised the following indicators of quality: performance of all laboratory tests on admission (including lipids and carbohydrate deficient transferrin), determination of AP aetiology, abdomen ultrasound (US) within the first 24 h after admission, contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen in all cases of suspected pancreatic necrosis, appropriately selected and sufficiently used antibiotic therapy (if necessary), pain control, adequate hydration, control of haemodynamic parameters and transfer to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (if necessary), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in biliary AP, surgical treatment (if necessary), and advice on outpatient follow-up after discharge. A comparison of the length of stay with that in other Slovenian hospitals was also performed. RESULTS: There were 139 patients treated in the three-year period after the introduction of a CP, of which 81 (58.3%) were male and 58 (41.7%) female. The patients' mean age was 59.6 ± 17.3 years. The most common aetiologies were alcoholism and gallstones (38.8% each), followed by unexplained (11.5%), drug-induced, hypertriglyceridemia, post ERCP (2.9% each) and tumours (2.2%). Antibiotic therapy was prescribed in 72 (51.8%) patients. Abdominal US was performed in all patients within the first 24 h after admission. Thirty-two (23.0%) patients were treated in the ICU. Four patients died (2.9%). In comparison to 2006-2007, we found an increased number of alcoholic and biliary AP and an associated decrease in the number of unexplained aetiology cases. The use of antibiotics also significantly decreased after the implementation of a CP (from 70.3% to 51.8%; P = 0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality (1.8% vs 2.9%). The length of stay was significantly shorter when compared to the Slovenian average (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: The introduction of a CP has improved the treatment of patients with AP, as assessed by all of the observed parameters.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Clínicos , Pancreatite/terapia , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/mortalidade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Eslovênia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Arch Med Sci ; 10(2): 355-60, 2014 May 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24904672

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: General public views about heart failure (HF) alone and in comparison with other chronic conditions are largely unknown; thus we conducted this survey to evaluate general public awareness about HF and HF disease burden relative to common chronic disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey during European Heart Failure Awareness Day 2011. People visiting the stands and other activities in 12 Slovenian cities were invited to complete a 14-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The analysis included 850 subjects (age 56 ±15 years, 44% men, 55% completed secondary education or higher). Overall, 83% reported to have heard about HF, 58% knew someone with HF, and 35% believed that HF is a normal consequence of ageing. When compared to other chronic diseases, HF was perceived as less important than cancer, myocardial infarction, stroke and diabetes with only 6%, 12%, 7%, and 5% of subjects ranking HF as number 1 in terms of prevalence, cost, quality of life, and survival. A typical patient with HF symptoms was recognized by 30%, which was comparable to the description of myocardial ischemia (33%) and stroke (39%). Primary care physicians (53%) or specialists (52%) would be primary sources of information about HF. If experiencing HF, 83% would prefer their care to be focused on quality of life rather than on survival (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Many participants reported to have heard about heart failure but the knowledge was poor and with several misbeliefs. Heart failure was perceived as less important than several other chronic diseases, where cancer appears as a main concern among the general public.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...