SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer (2020).

The treatment of advanced prostate cancer has evolved due to recent advances in molecular research and new drug development. Dynamic aberrations in the androgen receptor, DNA repair genes, PTEN-PI3K, and other pathways drive the behavior of advanced prostate cancer allowing a better selection of therapies in each patient. Tumor testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is recommended for patients with metastatic prostate cancer, also considering a broad panel to guide decisions and genetic counseling. In symptomatic metastatic patients, castration should be stared to palliate symptoms and prolong survival. In high-risk or high-volume metastatic hormone-naïve patients, castration should be combined with docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide or apalutamide. Radiotherapy to the primary tumor combined with systemic therapy is recommended in low-volume mHNPC patients. In patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant tumors, risk stratification can define the frequency of imaging. Adding enzalutamide, darolutamide or apalutamide to these patients prolongs metastasis-free and overall survival, but potential adverse events need to be taken into consideration. The choice of docetaxel, abiraterone or enzalutamide for treating metastatic castration-resistant patients depends on previous therapies, with cabazitaxel being also recommended after docetaxel. Olaparib is recommended in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutated castration-resistant patients after progression on at least one new hormonal therapy. Aggressive variants of prostate cancer respond to platinum-based chemotherapy. To optimize treatment efficiency, oncologists should incorporate all of these advances into an overall therapeutic strategy.

Latest progress in molecular biology and treatment in genitourinary tumours.

The management of genitourinary cancer, including bladder, prostate, renal and testicular cancer, has evolved dramatically in recent years due to a better understanding of tumour genetic mutations, alterations in molecular pathways, and to the development of new kinds of drugs such as targeted therapies and immunotherapies. In the field of immunotherapy, new drugs focused on stimulating, enhancing and modulating the immune system to detect and destroy cancer, have been recently discovered. Research in oncology moves quickly and new data of great relevance for clinical practice are communicated every year. For this reason, a group of experts, focused exclusively on the treatment of genitourinary tumours and who get together every year in the BestGU conference to assess the latest progress in this field have summarized the most important advances in a single review, along with a critical assessment of whether these results should alter daily clinical practice.

Synchronous versus metachronous brain metastasis from testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT): an analysis from the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group data base.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases of testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) are a rare event. Prognostic is poor and there is not much evidence on optimal management of these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A review of case records of germ cell tumor patients within the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group data base from 1994 to 2012 was conducted. RESULTS: Thirty-three out of 6,200 cases (0.5 %). Nineteen patients (57 %) group 1: synchronous, 13 (40 %) group 2: metachronous and only one developed brain metastasis during cisplatin-based chemotherapy (excluded from the analysis). Median serum BHCG levels at initial diagnosis was higher in group 1, whereas elevated AFP serum levels were more common in group 2. Histology in the primary tumor: chorionic carcinoma for group 1 versus embryonal carcinoma for group 2. Mainly solitary brain metastasis in group 2 (54 versus 21 %, respectively). The median overall survival from the diagnosis of central nervous system involvement was 16 months for group 1 (CI 95 % 13.9-18) and 23 months (95 % CI 0-165) for group 2 (log rank p = 0.84). Long-term survivors were practically identical in the two groups (38.9 % group 1 versus 38.5 % group 2). Regardless of the timing of brain metastasis, those patients that achieved complete response to the treatment had better survival (log rank p 0.003). CONCLUSION: Although some distinctive clinical characteristics have been found between patients with synchronous versus metachronous brain metastasis from TGCT, the timing of brain metastasis did not seem to have prognostic influence, but due to the retrospective nature of the analysis and the results should be interpreted with caution.

Phase II trial of sequential subcutaneous interleukin-2 plus interferon alpha followed by sorafenib in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy (IL-2 and INF-α) was the treatment of choice for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) until antiangiogenic therapy with tyrosin kinase inhibitors was developed in the early 2000s. This clinical trial explored the efficacy and toxicity of sequential treatment of IL-2 plus INF-α followed by sorafenib. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included measurable, non-resectable, histologically confirmed predominantly clear cell RCC, no prior systemic treatment, and ECOG PS 0-2. The treatment regimen was a 6-week cycle of subcutaneous IL-2 at 9 × 10(6) IU on days 1-6 of weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 plus s.c. INF-α at 6 × 10(6) IU on days 1, 3 and 5 of weeks 1-6. Responders received 6 additional weeks of this regimen. All patients received oral sorafenib (400 mg bid) after immunotherapy until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled, median age 57 years. ECOG was 0/1 in 17/20 patients, 35 patients had prior nephrectomy and 18 patients pure clear cell cancer. Median PFS was 7.4 months (95 % CI 6.5-13.1) and OS was 16.6 months (95 % CI not reached). In 36 patients evaluable for response, ORR was 44.4 % and control rate was 94.4 %. Most adverse events (AEs) were Grade 1 or 2 toxicities (84.7 %). During immunotherapy the most common AEs were pyrexia (82.9 %), asthenia (56.1 %) and anorexia (46.3 %), whereas during sorafenib were diarrhoea (48.8 %) and hand-foot syndrome (46.3 %). CONCLUSIONS: A sequential regimen of IL-2 and INF-α followed by sorafenib showed effectiveness and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced RCC.