Are the Effects of Resistance Exercise on Pain and Function in Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Dependent on Exercise Volume, Duration, and Adherence? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine dose parameters for resistance exercise associated with improvements in pain and physical function in knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) and whether these improvements were related to adherence. METHODS: We searched six databases, from inception to January 28, 2023, for randomized controlled trials comparing land-based, resistance exercise-only interventions with no intervention, or any other intervention. There were four subgroups of intervention duration: 0 to <3 months, 3 to 6 months, >6 to <12 months, ≥12 months. The between-group effect was calculated for immediate postintervention pain and physical function (activities of daily living [ADL] and sports/recreation [SPORT]). RESULTS: For both knee and hip, data from 280 studies showed moderate benefit for pain, physical function ADL, and physical function SPORT in favor of interventions 3 to 6 months. For the knee, there was also a moderate benefit for physical function ADL in favor of interventions >6 to <12 months. From 151 knee and hip studies that provided total exercise volume data (frequency, time, duration), there was no association between volume with the effect size for pain and physical function. A total of 74 studies (69 knee, 5 hip) reported usable adherence data. There was no association between adherence with the effect size for pain and physical function. CONCLUSION: In knee and hip OA, resistance exercise interventions 3 to 6 months (and for the knee >6 to <12 months) duration improve pain and physical function. Improvements do not depend on exercise volume or adherence, suggesting exercise does not require rigid adherence to a specific dose.

Fundamentals of osteoarthritis. Rehabilitation: Exercise, diet, biomechanics, and physical therapist-delivered interventions.

Insights related to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA) have informed rehabilitative treatments that aim to mitigate the influence of several known impairments and risk factors for OA, with the goal to improve pain, function, and quality of life. The purpose of this invited narrative review is to provide fundamental knowledge to non-specialists about exercise and education, diet, biomechanical interventions, and other physical therapist-delivered treatments. In addition to summarizing the rationale for common rehabilitative therapies, we provide a synthesis of current core recommendations. Robust evidence based on randomized clinical trials supports exercise with education and diet as core treatments for OA. Structured, supervised exercise therapy is advised. The mode of exercise may vary but should be individualized. The dose should be based on an initial assessment, the desired physiological changes, and progressed when appropriate. Diet combined with exercise is strongly recommended and studies demonstrate a dose-response relationship between the magnitude of weight loss and symptom improvement. Recent evidence suggests the use of technology to remotely deliver exercise, diet and education interventions is cost-effective. Although several studies support the mechanisms for biomechanical interventions (e.g., bracing, shoe inserts) and physical therapist-delivered (passive) treatments (e.g., manual therapy, electrotherapeutic modalities) fewer rigorous randomized trials support their clinical use; these therapies are sometimes recommended as adjuncts to core treatments. The mechanisms of action for all rehabilitative interventions include contextual factors such as attention and placebo effects. These effects can challenge our interpretation of treatment efficacy from clinical trials, yet also provide opportunities to maximize patient outcomes in clinical practice. When evaluating rehabilitative interventions, the field may benefit from increased emphasis on research that considers contextual factors while evaluating mechanistic, longer-term, clinically-important and policy-relevant outcome measures.

The relationship between muscle capacity utilization during gait and pain in people with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Muscle capacity utilization reflects the percentage of maximal knee extensor strength required to complete physical activities. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is pain associated with muscle capacity utilization during walking in older adults with knee osteoarthritis? Secondarily, is muscle capacity utilization in older adults with knee osteoarthritis sex-specific? METHODS: Twenty-three participants (15 females) with symptomatic knee OA completed this study [age 67 ( ± 8) years, body mass index 29.7 ( ± 3.9) kg/m2, gait speed during the Six Minute Walk test 1.25 ( ± 0.25) m/s]. Pain was measured using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Muscle capacity utilization was quantified as the peak external knee flexor moment during level walking normalized to knee extensor maximum voluntary isometric contraction. The knee flexor moment was calculated from kinematic and kinetic data during barefoot level walking at a self-selected speed and at 1.1 m/s. Knee extensor maximum voluntary isometric contraction was measured on a dynamometer. Multiple linear regressions were used to determine the relationship between pain and muscle capacity utilization after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and gait speed. Independent sample t-tests examined sex differences. RESULTS: Pain was not associated with muscle capacity utilization during self-selected and standardized walking speeds (p = 0.38 and p = 0.36, respectively). Females did not require a greater muscle capacity utilization than males to complete gait at self-selected and standardized speeds (p = 0.28, and p = 0.40, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: Muscle capacity utilization was not associated with pain during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis. Future work should explore more challenging activities of daily living in knee OA.

Strong independent associations between gait biomechanics and pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

We investigated the simple and multivariate associations between knee pain and gait biomechanics. 279 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) and discordant changes in pain between limbs after walking completed bilateral three-dimensional gait analysis. For each limb, patients rated their pain before and after a 6-min walk and the change in pain was recorded as an increase (≥1 points) or not (≤0 points). Among paired limbs, the simple and multivariate associations between an increase in pain and the external moments in each orthogonal plane were evaluated using conditional logistic regression. The analyses were then repeated for knee angles. Univariate analyses demonstrated associations in each plane that varied in both magnitude and direction, with larger associations for the knee moments [Odds Ratio (95% confidence interval) = first peak adduction moment: 2.80 (2.02, 3.88), second peak adduction moment: 2.36 (1.73, 3.24), adduction impulse: 6.65 (3.50, 12.62), flexion moment: 0.46 (0.36, 0.60), extension moment: 0.56 (0.44, 0.71), internal rotation moment: 7.54 (3.32, 17.13), external rotation moment: 0.001 (0.00, 0.04)]. Multivariate analyses with backward elimination resulted in a model including only the adduction impulse [5.35 (2.51, 11.42)], flexion moment [0.32 (0.22, 0.46)] and extension moment [0.28 (0.19, 0.42)]. The varus, flexion and extension angles were included in the final multivariate model for the knee angles. When between-person confounding is lessened by comparing limbs within patients, there are strong independent associations between knee pain and multiple external knee moments that vary in magnitude and direction. While controlling for other knee moments, a greater adduction impulse and lower flexion and extension moments were independently associated with greater odds of an increase in pain.

Improved Methods to Measure Outcomes After High Tibial Osteotomy.

Observational studies suggest high tibial osteotomy produces substantial improvements in knee loading and stability that can limit the progression of joint damage; decrease pain; improve function and quality of life; and delay the need for knee replacement surgery. It can be cost-effective in knee osteoarthritis. However, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines are unable to provide strong recommendations, because limited high-level evidence supports its therapeutic value versus other treatments. We describe findings suggesting it can improve outcomes important to knee joint structure and function, patient quality of life, and health care systems. Future clinical trials are warranted and required.

Association Between Knee Load and Pain: Within-Patient, Between-Knees, Case-Control Study in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The association between knee loading and pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis is reported to be low and of questionable importance, but may be confounded by several factors that differ between patients. We aimed to elucidate the association between dynamic knee load and pain by minimizing confounding using a study design that was within the same patient, with knees discordant for pain. METHODS: A total of 265 patients with knees discordant for pain (530 knees) rated the pain in each knee before and after walking for 6 minutes, and then underwent 3-dimensional gait analysis. RESULTS: The peak knee adduction moment and knee adduction impulse (proxies for medial knee loading) were associated with increased pain (odds ratio [OR] 2.43 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.77-3.33] and OR 6.62 [95% CI 3.46-12.7], respectively) and remained significant after controlling for radiographic disease severity. When split into quartiles, ORs indicated knees in the highest loading quartile had greater odds of experiencing increased pain with walking (OR 4.7 95% CI 2.3-9.5] for peak adduction moment; OR 9.0 [95% CI 4.0-20.1] for adduction impulse) compared to knees in the lowest loading quartile. CONCLUSION: When between-patient confounding is minimized, there is a strong association between medial knee load and increased knee pain during walking.

Valgus bracing for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of valgus knee bracing on pain and function, and compliance and complications, in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared changes in patient-reported pain and/or function in patients with medial knee OA was performed. Seven databases were searched from their inception to January 2014. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, rated risk of bias, and extracted data. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for standardized mean differences (SMDs) for the improvement in pain (and function) were calculated. Event rates (proportions) were calculated for studies that reported complications. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, there was a statistically significant difference favoring the valgus brace group for improvement in pain (SMD 0.33 [95% CI 0.13, 0.52], P = 0.001) and function (SMD 0.22 [95% CI 0.02, 0.41], P = 0.03). When compared to a control group that did not use an orthosis, the effect size was moderate for pain (SMD 0.56 [95% CI 0.03, 1.09], P = 0.04) and function (SMD 0.48 [95% CI 0.02, 0.95], P = 0.04). When compared to a control group that used a control orthosis, only a small, statistically significant effect for pain remained (SMD 0.33 [95% CI 0.08, 0.58], P = 0.01). Instructions for brace use varied considerably and compliance ranged from 45% to 100%. Up to 25% of patients reported minor complications with brace use. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis of randomized trials suggests valgus bracing for medial knee OA results in small-to-moderate improvements in pain. Effect sizes vary based on study design and warrant future research.

Revisiting Fitts and Peterson (1964): width and amplitude manipulations to the reaching environment elicit dissociable movement times.

The classic theorem of Fitts (1954) asserts that the combined effects of movement amplitude and target width (index of difficulty: ID) define movement times (MTs) for goal-directed reaches. Moreover, Fitts' theorem states that reaches yielding the same ID produce equivalent MTs regardless of the response's amplitude and width combination. However, most work providing direct support for Fitts' theorem has employed short movement amplitudes and small target widths. Thus, no direct evidence supports the unitary nature of MT/ID relations across a range of amplitudes and widths used in contemporary studies of goal-directed reaching. To that end, we contrasted MT/ID relations for discrete reaches equated for movement ID but differing with respect to their amplitude (15.5, 19, 25.5, and 38 cm) and width (2, 3, 4, and 5 cm) requirements. Results show that amplitude and width manipulations yielded robust linear MT/ID relations; however, the slope of the MT/ID function was markedly steeper in the former (amplitude=92 ms; width=13 ms). Such findings indicate that the constituent elements of movement ID are dissociable and that the fixed parameter nature of Fitts' theorem cannot be applied to a continuous range of veridical movement amplitudes and target widths.