Combined FDG PET/MRI versus Standard-of-Care Imaging in the Evaluation of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Purpose: To compare combined cardiac fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MRI with standard-of-care evaluation using cardiac MRI, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and SPECT perfusion imaging in suspected cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with respect to radiation dose, imaging duration, and diagnostic test performance. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with suspected CS undergoing clinical evaluation with cardiac 18F-FDG PET/CT and gated rest technetium 99m sestamibi SPECT perfusion imaging were prospectively recruited between November 2017 and May 2021 for parallel assessment with combined cardiac 18F-FDG PET/MRI on the same day (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03356756). Total effective radiation dose and imaging duration were compared between approaches (combined cardiac PET/MRI vs separate cardiac MRI, PET/CT, and SPECT). MRI findings were initially interpreted without PET data, and then PET and late gadolinium enhancement images were fused and interpreted together. Final diagnosis of CS was established using Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare guidelines. Results: Forty participants (mean age, 54 years ± 14 [SD]; 26 [65%] male participants) were included, 14 (35%) with a final diagnosis of CS. Compared with separate cardiac MRI, PET/CT, and SPECT perfusion imaging, combined cardiac PET/MRI had 52% lower total radiation dose (8.0 mSv ± 1.2 vs 16.8 mSv ± 1.6, P < .001) and 43% lower total imaging duration (122 minutes ± 15 vs 214 minutes ± 26, P < .001). Combined PET/MRI had the highest area under the curve for diagnosis of CS (0.84) with 96% specificity and 71% sensitivity for colocalized FDG uptake and late gadolinium enhancement in a pattern typical for CS. Conclusion: In the evaluation of suspected CS, combined cardiac 18F-FDG PET/MRI had a lower radiation dose, shorter imaging duration, and higher diagnostic performance compared with standard-of-care imaging.Clinical trial registration no. NCT03356756Keywords: Cardiac Sarcoidosis, 18F-FDG PET/MRI, 18F-FDG PET/CT, SPECT Perfusion Imaging, Cardiac MRI, Standard-of-Care Imaging Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

Imaging Acute and Chronic Cardiac Complications of COVID-19 and after COVID-19 Vaccination.

COVID-19 is associated with acute and longer-term cardiovascular manifestations including myocardial injury, myopericarditis, stress-induced cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and thromboembolic disease. Although the morbidity and mortality related to acute COVID-19 have decreased substantially, there is growing concern about the longer-term cardiovascular effects of the disease and postacute sequelae. Myocarditis has also been reported after messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based COVID-19 vaccination, with the highest risk among adolescent boys and young adult men. Noninvasive imaging including cardiac MRI has a key role in identifying the presence of cardiovascular disease, evaluating for potential mechanisms of injury, stratifying risk of future adverse cardiovascular events, and potentially guiding treatment in patients with suspected cardiovascular injury after COVID-19 and vaccination. Patterns of injury identified at cardiac MRI after COVID-19 include myocarditis and pericarditis, myocardial ischemia, and infarction. Myocardial edema and late gadolinium enhancement have been described months after the initial infection in a minority of patients with persistent cardiac symptoms after COVID-19. In patients with myocarditis after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination, the most common pattern of late gadolinium enhancement is subepicardial at the basal inferolateral wall, and patients tend to have milder imaging abnormalities compared with those from other causes of myocarditis. This article describes the role of multimodality cardiac imaging and imaging findings in patients with acute and longer-term cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and in patients with myocarditis after receiving an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination.

Myocarditis is an established but rare adverse event following administration of messenger RNA-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and is most common in male adolescents and young adults. Symptoms typically develop within a few days of vaccine administration. Most patients have mild abnormalities on cardiac imaging with rapid clinical improvement with standard treatment. However, longer term follow-up is needed to determine whether imaging abnormalities persist, to evaluate for adverse outcomes, and to understand the risk associated with subsequent vaccination. The purpose of the review is to evaluate the current literature related to myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination, including the incidence, risk factors, clinical course, imaging findings, and proposed pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination.

Myocarditis is an established but rare adverse event following administration of messenger RNA-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and is most common in male adolescents and young adults. Symptoms typically develop within a few days of vaccine administration. Most patients have mild abnormalities on cardiac imaging with rapid clinical improvement with standard treatment. However, longer term follow-up is needed to determine whether imaging abnormalities persist, to evaluate for adverse outcomes, and to understand the risk associated with subsequent vaccination. The purpose of the review is to evaluate the current literature related to myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination, including the incidence, risk factors, clinical course, imaging findings, and proposed pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Evaluation of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Perfusion.

BACKGROUND: In patients with liver cirrhosis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) displays an effective method for treating portal hypertension. Main indications include refractory ascites and secondary prevention of esophageal bleeding. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) plays a leading role in the follow-up management, whereas contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is not routinely considered. We compared the efficacy of CEUS to CDUS and highlighted differences compared to findings of corresponding computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (2) Methods: On a retrospective basis, 106 patients with CEUS examination after TIPS were included. The enrollment period was 12 years (between 2008 and 2020) and the age group ranged from 23.3 to 82.1 years. In addition, 92 CDUS, 43 CT and 58 MRI scans were evaluated for intermodal comparison. (3) Results: Intermodal analysis and comparison revealed a high level of concordance between CDUS, CT and MRI in the vast majority of cases. In comparison to CDUS, the correlation of the relevant findings was 92.5%, 95.3% for CT and 87.9% for MRI. In some cases, however, additional information was provided by CEUS (4) Conclusions: CEUS depicts a safe and effective imaging modality for follow-up after TIPS. In addition to CDUS, CEUS enables specific assessment of stent pathologies and stent dysfunction due to its capacity to dynamically visualize single microbubbles at high spatial and temporal resolution. Due to the low number of adverse events regarding the application of contrast agents, CEUS can be administered to a very broad patient population, thus avoiding additional radiation exposure compared to CT angiography in cases with divergent findings during follow-up.

Safety assessment and diagnostic evaluation of patients undergoing contrast-enhanced urosonography in the setting of vesicoureteral reflux confirmation.

BACKGROUND: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) represents a common pediatric anomaly in children with an upper urinary tract infection (UTI) and is defined as a retrograde flow of urine from the bladder into the upper urinary tract. There are many diagnostic options available, including voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and contrasted-enhanced urosonography (ceVUS). ceVUS combines a diagnostic tool with a high sensitivity and specificity which, according to previous study results, was even shown to be superior to VCUG. Nevertheless, despite the recommendation of the EFSUMB, the ceVUS has not found a widespread use in clinical diagnostics in Europe yet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2016 and 2020, 49 patients with a marked female dominance (n = 37) were included. The youngest patient had an age of 5 months, the oldest patient 60 years. The contrast agent used in ceVUS was SonoVue®, a second-generation blood-pool agent. All examinations were performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB Level 3). RESULTS: The 49 patients included in the study showed no adverse effects. 51% of patients (n = 26) were referred with the initial diagnosis of suspected VUR, while 49% of patients (n = 23) came for follow-up examination or to rule out recurrence of VUR. The vast majority had at least one febrile urinary tract infection in their recent medical history (n = 45; 91,8%). CONCLUSION: ceVUS is an examination method with a low risk profile which represents with its high sensitivity and specificity an excellent diagnostic tool in the evaluation of vesicoureteral reflux, especially in consideration of a generally very young patient cohort.

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography with Regard to the Further Therapy Regime and Patient Outcome-A Single-Center Experience in an Interdisciplinary Uroradiological Setting.

Background and Objectives: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) describes a common pediatric anomaly in pediatric urology with a prevalence of 1-2%. In diagnostics, in addition to the gold standard of voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), contrast-enhanced urosonography (ceVUS) offers a radiation-free procedure, which, despite its advantages, is not yet widely used. In the present single-center study, subsequent therapeutic procedures and outcomes after ceVUS of 49 patients were investigated. The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of ceVUS with the intention of broader clinical implementation. Materials and Methods: Between 2016 and 2020, 49 patients were retrospectively included and received a ceVUS to evaluate VUR. With a distribution of 47:2 (95.9%), a clear female predominance was present. The age of the patients varied between 5 months and 60 years at the time of ceVUS. All examinations were all performed and subsequently interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3). Results: Compared to intraoperative findings, ceVUS shows a sensitivity of 95.7% with a specificity of 100%. Allergic reactions to the contrast medium could not be observed. Conclusion: With its high sensitivity and intraoperative validation, ceVUS offers an excellent alternative to VCUG, the gold standard in the diagnosis of VUR. In addition, ceVUS is a radiation-free examination method with a low risk profile that offers an exceptional diagnostic tool in the diagnostic clarification of recurrent urinary tract infections with the suspected diagnosis of VUR and should also be included in the consideration of a diagnosis next to the established VCUG, especially in younger children.