Genetic profile in patients with complicated acute aortic syndrome: the GEN-AOR study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Genetic testing is becoming increasingly important for diagnosis and personalized treatments in aortopathies. Here, we aimed to genetically diagnose a group of acute aortic syndrome (AAS) patients consecutively admitted to an intensive care unit and to explore the clinical usefulness of AAS-associated variants during treatment decision-making and family traceability. METHODS: We applied targeted next-generation sequencing, covering 42 aortic diseases genes in AAS patients with no signs consistent with syndromic conditions. Detected variants were segregated by Sanger sequencing in available family members. Demographic features, risk factors and clinical symptoms were statistically analyzed by Fisher or Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact tests, to assess their relationship with genetic results. RESULTS: Analysis of next-generation sequencing data in 73 AAS patients led to the detection of 34 heterozygous candidate variants in 14 different genes in 32 patients. Family screening was performed in 31 relatives belonging to 9 families. We found 13 relatives harboring the family variant, of which 10 showed a genotype compatible with the occurrence of AAS. Statistical tests revealed that the factors associated with a positive genetic diagnosis were the absence of hypertension, lower age, family history of AAS and absence of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings broaden the spectrum of the genetic background for AAS. In addition, both index patients and studied relatives benefited from the results obtained, establishing the most appropriate level of surveillance for each group. Finally, this strategy could be reinforced by the use of stastistically significant clinical features as a predictive tool for the hereditary character of AAS. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (Identifier: NCT04751058).

Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Donation After Circulatory Death (Controlled and Uncontrolled): Metabolic Differences and Kidney Transplantation Evolution.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze metabolic differences during normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) between the dissimilar types of donation after circulatory death, uncontrolled (uDCD) and controlled (cDCD), and the evolution of the transplanted kidneys. METHODS: Observational, prospective, cohort study. We included patients from uDCD and cDCD maintained with NRP in 2017. Six consecutive blood gases were collected with determination of pH and lactic acid. Creatinine levels were monitored at 24 hours, 3 months, and 6 months after transplant and the need for renal replacement therapy was evaluated. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, presenting the qualitative variables as frequencies and percentages, and quantitative as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range [IQR]). We used χ2 testing for bivariate analysis of qualitative variables. RESULTS: We collected 18 donors. Fifteen out of 18 (83.3%) were men with a median of 51 years (IQR, 46-60). Eleven out of 18 (61.1%) were cDCD and 7 out of 18 (38.9%) were uDCD. The blood gas results are illustrated in Table 1. A total of 28 renal transplants were obtained with a median age of 47 years (IQR, 45-57); 83% were male. Ten out of 28 (35.7%) came from uDCD and 18 out of 28 (64.7%) from cDCD. Table 2 shows the monitoring of the creatinine values of the recipients after the transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: There are more metabolic disorders in our series in uDCD organ donation compared with cDCD. The recovery of the renal function of organs from uDCD is slower than that of cDCD, however; the tendency is toward normality.