Diagnostic usefulness of inflammatory markers in acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) affects early morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation. The diagnostic technique of choice is endomyocardial biopsy. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of inflammatory markers as a noninvasive method to monitor cellular rejection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 73 cardiac transplant patients by determining the serum levels of protein fibrinogen (fgpro), functional fibrinogen (fgfun), C-reactive protein (CRP), and sialic acid (SA) coinciding with an endomyocardial biopsy (5.1 revisions/patient). The statistical methods were chi(2), Student's t-test, and ROC curves. RESULTS: Of the 373 controls, significant rejection was detected in 19%. Analysis of the relationship between ACR and the markers showed significantly elevated levels of fgpro (345 +/- 90 versus 307 +/- 74 mg/dL; P = .03), fgfun (361 +/- 101 versus 318 +/- 89 mg/dL; P = .04), and SA (74 +/- 22 versus 66 +/- 15 mg/dL; P = .02), but not CRP (19 +/- 29 versus 10 +/- 21 mg/dL; P = .07). SA displayed a better diagnostic utility (area under the curve 0.7; P < .01), 35% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 82% negative predictive value for a cutoff point of 80 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Among the inflammatory markers increased in ACR, SA was the most useful noninvasive tool for screening.

Do cardiovascular risk factors influence cardiac allograft vasculopathy?

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the leading cause of heart transplant failure after the first year. The etiological factors involved are currently a controversial matter. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is considered the diagnostic procedure of choice. We assessed the relationship of cardiovascular risk factors with CAV. MATERIALS: We analyzed prospectively 22 patients. We conducted a first study with coronary angiography and IVUS at 36 +/- 3 days and a second at 598 +/- 49 days. We performed an average of 5.6 clinical revisions per patient, assessing the effect of the classic cardiovascular risk factors, the cause of heart failure, and the age of the patient and donor. The statistics used were chi(2), Fisher exact test, and Student t test. RESULTS: CAV was found in 10 subjects (45.5%). Univariate analysis showed statistically significant differences in the assessment of the presence of diabetes and dyslipidemia posttransplantation, but not pretransplantation. Among the patients with CAV there was a higher percentage of diabetics (32.8% vs 12%, P < .01). The patients with CAV also had higher levels of total cholesterol (211 +/- 40 mg/dL vs 195 +/- 35 mg/dL, P = .02), triglycerides (172 +/- 108 mg/dL vs 136 +/- 66 mg/dL, P = .03), low-density lipoprotein (133 +/- 35 mg/dL vs 117 +/- 30 mg/dL, P = .01), and lower high-density lipoprotein levels (46 +/- 15 mg/dL vs 52 +/- 12 mg/dL, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Only the diabetes and dyslipidemia present in the posttransplantation period were associated with CAV, which highlights the fact that it is a condition that both shares and has different features with atherosclerosis and probably requires a different diagnostic-therapeutic approach.

Desaparición de una masa valvular aórtica con anticoagulación / Aortic valvular mass disappearance with anticoagulation

Describimos el caso de una mujer joven seguida en la consulta de Neurología por episodios de vértigo, pérdida de campo visual y síncopes. La batería de pruebas analíticas solicitada resultó anodina, descartándose un substrato trombofílico. Las pruebas de imagen pusieron de manifiesto la presencia de lesiones isquémicas occipitales de probable origen microembólico o vasculítico. Ante la repetición de nuevos episodios neurológicos focales se practicó una ecocardiografía transtorácica seguida de un ETE. Esta última constató la presencia de una masa valvular aórtica asociada a regurgitación significativa. Analizando las características ecocardiográficas de la masa, así como el contexto clínico de la paciente, se llegó al diagnóstico de probable fibroelastoma papilar aórtico y se pautó anticoagulación oral. Un año más tarde hemos comprobado la desaparición de la masa valvular aórtica así como la disminución del grado de regurgitación (AU)