Skin cancer risk after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has improved outcomes for severe hematologic, malignant, and immune disorders, yet poses an increased risk of subsequent malignancies. This study aimed to examine the risk of skin cancer following HSCT and identify potential risk factors. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases until December 2023. Cohort studies reporting standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for post-HSCT skin cancer or investigating risk factors were included. SIRs, or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated using random-effects inverse-variance models. Outcome endpoints were SIRs of skin cancer post-HSCT and risk factors, including gender, chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), voriconazole exposure, and total body irradiation (TBI). Twenty-six studies involving 164,944 HSCT recipients (allogeneic HSCT, n = 68,637; autologous HSCT, n = 95,435; mean age: 38.5 ± 13.8 years; 71,354 females [43.3%]) were analyzed. Overall, SIR for skin cancer post-HSCT was 7.21 (95% CI 3.98-13.08), with SIRs of 2.25 (95% CI: 1.37-3.68) for autologous HSCT, and 10.18 (95% CI 5.07-20.43) for allogeneic HSCT. Risk factors for skin cancer risk included cGVHD (HR = 2.86 [95% CI: 2.01-4.07]), specifically for basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (HR = 1.80 [95% CI: 1.31-2.46] and HR = 3.68 [95% CI: 2.39-5.68], respectively), male gender (HR = 1.56 [95% CI: 1.15-2.13]), especially for SCC (HR = 1.70 [95% CI: 1.03-2.80]), and voriconazole exposure (HR = 2.01 [95% CI: 1.12-3.61]). TBI showed no statistically significant association with subsequent skin cancer (HR = 1.12 [95% CI: 0.73-1.71]). These findings highlight the importance of rigorous skin cancer surveillance and preventive strategies in HSCT recipients, particularly in male individuals undergoing allogeneic transplants and those with identifiable risk factors, to enable early detection and intervention.

Successful Treatment of Stimulator of Interferon Genes-Associated Vasculopathy of Infantile Onset SAVI Syndrome With Anifrolumab.

This case report describes a woman in her 30s who presented with cutaneous lesions since age of 2 to 3 years with erythema and pain on her nose, both cheeks, and ears when exposed to cold temperatures that progressed to nasal and auricular cartilage necrosis and was diagnosed with stimulator of interferon genes­associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI syndrome).

Real-world effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for hidradenitis suppurativa: An ambispective observational study.

In this original research, we present the results in terms of effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for hidradenitis suppurativa in real clinical practice. Results indicated significant improvement in all activity scores and patient-reported outcomes at week 16, including a notable decrease in mean IHS4 from 27.1 to 15.6 (p < 0.001), HS-PGA from 5.1 to 3.2 (p < 0.001), VAS pain from 8.3 to 4.7 (p < 0.001) and DLQI from 21.6 to 12.6 (p < 0.001). Bimekizumab, administered every 2 or 4 weeks, was well-tolerated with no discontinuations and no new safety concerns identified. These findings corroborate the drug's effectiveness and favourable safety profile observed in phase 3 clinical trials, supporting its use in real-world clinical practice for treating HS.

Efficacy of Omalizumab for the treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid. Spanish multicenter real-world experience.

BACKGROUND: Bullous Pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease. Most patients are elderly and associate multiple comorbidities. Topical and systemic corticosteroids are considered as the first-line treatment for BP and immunosuppressors are used as steroid-sparing treatments but both have side effects and contraindications which are even more common in this elderly population. New treatments targeting interleukins and receptors related to BP pathogenesis have been proposed to decrease this side effects while achieving equal or better effectiveness response rates.Omalizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets IgE that has been proposed for the treatment of BP due to the evidence that IgE autoantibodies play an essential role in BP pathogenesis. OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY: To assess the efficacy and security of Omalizumab for the treatment of BP, we carried out a multicenter, retrospective, observational study including patients diagnosed of BP who received omalizumab for at least 3 months from 15 tertiary hospitals in Spain. IgE levels prior to treatment was measured and we evaluate the possible correlation with clinical response. We excluded patients treated with Omalizumab for less than 3 months as we consider this duration is insufficient for a comprehensive assessment of its efficacy. To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment we used the percentage of BSA improvement. RESULTS: We included 36 patients. The vast majority associate multiple comorbidities and all patients had used other systemic therapies apart from corticoids before Omalizumab.83% experienced some kind of treatment response and 42% of all patient treated achieved complete response.We did not find any correlation between higher levels and a better response (p=0,1791).All patients tolerated Omalizumab without reported side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab is a good therapeutic alternative for BP as it obtained clinical response in most patients and nearly half of the cases achieving complete response. It showed no side effects which is crucial in elderly patients suffering from BP.