Impact of New Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. Results of the "ACO-VID" Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) on patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: Multicenter and retrospective study that included subjects >55 years hospitalized with COVID-19 from March to October 2020 in Spanish hospitals. Patients were divided into 3 groups (no AF, new-onset AF, and preexisting AF) and followed-up to 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 668 patients were included, of whom 162 (24.3%) had no AF, 107 (16.0%) new-onset AF and 399 (59.7%) preexisting AF. Compared to patients without AF, those patients with new-onset AF were older and had more comorbidities, but without differences with preexisting AF. During hospitalization, in the univariate analysis, compared to patients without AF, major bleeding and cardiovascular mortality were more frequent in patients with new-onset AF (10.3% vs 0.6%; P < .001; 2.8% vs 0.6%; P = .025, respectively), with a trend toward more stroke (1.9% vs 0%; P = .085). Outcomes were similar between AF groups, but the length of stay was greater in preexisting AF patients. Among patients with new-onset AF taking reduced doses of anticoagulant treatment was associated with higher risks of stroke and major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 hospitalized patients, new-onset AF may be associated with worse outcomes, but influenced by the dose of anticoagulants.

Impact of atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation on the risk of death, thromboembolic disease and bleeding in patients with COVID-19: the ACO-VID Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical profile, risk of complications and impact of anticoagulation in COVID-19 hospitalized patients, according to the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, and observational study that consecutively included patients >55 years admitted with COVID-19 from March to October 2020. In AF patients, anticoagulation was chosen based on clinicians' judgment. Patients were followed-up for 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 646 patients were included, of whom 75.2% had AF. Overall, mean age was 75 ± 9.1 years and 62.4% were male. Patients with AF were older and had more comorbidities. The most common anticoagulants used during hospitalization in patients with AF were edoxaban (47.9%), low molecular weight heparin (27.0%), and dabigatran (11.7%) and among patients without AF, these numbers were 0%, 93.8% and 0%. Overall, during the study period (68 ± 3 days), 15.2% of patients died, 8.2% of patients presented a major bleeding and 0.9% had a stroke/systemic embolism. During hospitalization, patients with AF had a higher risk of major bleeding (11.3% vs 0.7%; p < .01), COVID-19-related deaths (18.0% vs 4.5%; p = .02), and all-cause deaths (20.6% vs 5.6%; p = .02). Age (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.3) and elevated transaminases (HR 3.5; 95% CI 2.0-6.1) were independently associated with all-cause mortality. AF was independently associated with major bleeding (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-5.3). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, patients with AF were older, had more comorbidities and had a higher risk of major bleeding. Age and elevated transaminases during hospitalization, but not AF nor anticoagulant treatment increased the risk of all-cause death.

Study of the frequency and reasons for discontinuation of different lines of treatment in patients with multiple myeloma.

The availability of new agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma has allowed the use of multiple lines of treatment, but a percentage of patients do not reach to receive this combination because of toxicity and early death. In this regard, a cross-sectional European study evaluated the management of different lines and discontinuation of treatment in 7635 patients from seven countries in routine clinical practice, finding that 39% of European patients do not receive a second line and that only 4% of patients reach third line in Spain, a figure that is striking when comparing with the rest of the countries. We analyze the frequency and causes of treatment discontinuation in a series of 108 patients from a Spanish University hospital showing that the main reason for permanent treatment discontinuation after finishing first line was to have a response, while death due to disease progression accounted for the main reason in subsequent lines of therapy, with its frequency increasing according to the number of lines received. Additionally, in our longitudinal study, we estimated, using a competitive risk analysis, that 22% of patients would not receive a second line of therapy at 60 months and 47% would not reach third line, also at 60 months, showing a marked discrepancy with the results reported in the cross-sectional European study. Although based on limited data, our results suggest the convenience of validating the findings of cross-sectional studies conducted in large cohorts.