HELIX Syndrome, a Claudinopathy with Relevant Dermatological Manifestations: Report of Two New Cases.

HELIX syndrome (Hypohidrosis-Electrolyte disturbances-hypoLacrimia-Ichthyosis-Xerostomia) (MIM#617671) (ORPHA:528105), described in 2017, is due to an abnormal claudin 10 b protein, secondary to pathogenic CLDN10 variants. So far, only ten families have been described. We aim to describe the phenotype in the first Spanish family identified, highlight the skin anomalies as an important clue, and expand the genotypic spectrum. Two adult brothers from consanguineous parents with suspected ectodermal dysplasia (ED) since early childhood were re-evaluated. A comprehensive phenotypic exam and an aCGH + SNP4 × 180 K microarray followed by Sanger sequencing of the CLDN10 gene were performed. They presented hypohidrosis, xerosis, mild ichthyosis, plantar keratosis, palm hyperlinearity, alacrima, and xerostomia. In adulthood, they also developed a salt-losing nephropathy with hypokalemia and hypermagnesemia. The molecular study in both patients revealed a novel pathogenic homozygous deletion of 8 nucleotides in exon 2 of the CLDN10 gene [CLDN10 (NM_0006984.4): c.322_329delGGCTCCGA, p.Gly108fs*] leading to a premature truncation of the protein. Both parents were heterozygous carriers. Hypohidrosis, ichthyosis, and plantar keratosis associated with alacrima and xerostomia should raise suspicion for HELIX syndrome, which also includes nephropathy and electrolyte disturbances in adults. Given the potential for ED misdiagnosis in infancy, it is important to include the CLDN10 gene in a specific genodermatosis next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel to provide early diagnosis, accurate management, and genetic counseling.

EDA, EDAR, EDARADD and WNT10A allelic variants in patients with ectodermal derivative impairment in the Spanish population.

BACKGROUND: Ectodermal dysplasias (ED) are a group of genetic conditions affecting the development and/or homeostasis of two or more ectodermal derivatives. An attenuated phenotype is considered a non-syndromic trait when the patient is affected by only one impaired ectodermal structure, such as in non-syndromic tooth agenesis (NSTA) disorder. Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) is the most highly represented ED. X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED) is the most common subtype, with an incidence of 1/50,000-100,000 males, and is associated with the EDA gene (Xq12-q13.1); the dominant and recessive subtypes involve the EDAR (2q13) and EDARADD (1q42.3) genes, respectively. The WNT10A gene (2q35) is associated more frequently with NSTA. Our goal was to determine the mutational spectrum in a cohort of 72 Spanish patients affected by one or more ectodermal derivative impairments referred to as HED (63/72) or NSTA (9 /72) to establish the prevalence of the allelic variants of the four most frequently associated genes. Sanger sequencing of the EDA, EDAR, EDARADD and WNT10A genes and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) were performed. RESULTS: A total of 61 children and 11 adults, comprising 50 males and 22 females, were included. The average ages were 5.4 and 40.2 years for children and adults, respectively. A molecular basis was identified in 51/72 patients, including 47/63 HED patients, for whom EDA was the most frequently involved gene, and 4/9 NSTA patients, most of whom had variants of WNT10A. Among all the patients, 37/51 had variants of EDA, 8/51 had variants of the WNT10A gene, 4/51 had variants of EDAR and 5/51 had variants of EDARADD. In 42/51 of cases, the variants were inherited according to an X-linked pattern (27/42), with the remaining showing an autosomal dominant (10/42) or autosomal recessive (5/42) pattern. Among the NSTA patients, 3/9 carried pathogenic variants of WNT10A and 1/9 carried EDA variants. A total of 60 variants were detected in 51 patients, 46 of which were different, and out of these 46 variants, 12 were novel. CONCLUSIONS: This is the only molecular study conducted to date in the Spanish population affected by ED. The EDA, EDAR, EDARADD and WNT10A genes constitute the molecular basis in 70.8% of patients with a 74.6% yield in HED and 44.4% in NSTA. Twelve novel variants were identified. The WNT10A gene has been confirmed as the second molecular candidate that has been identified and accounts for one-half of non-EDA patients and one-third of NSTA patients. Further studies using next generation sequencing (NGS) will help to identify other contributory genes in the remaining uncharacterized Spanish patients.

Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™: the prospective experience of five prenatal diagnosis laboratories.

OBJECTIVE: We previously reported on the validation of Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ on retrospectively selected and prospective prenatal samples. This bead-based multiplex assay detects chromosome 13, 18, 21 and X/Y aneuploidies and the nine most frequent microdeletion syndromes. We demonstrated that Prenatal BACs-on-Beads(TM) is a new-generation, prenatal screening tool. Here, we describe the experience of five European prenatal diagnosis laboratories concerning the ongoing use of Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ . METHODS: Some 1653 samples were analyzed. All results were confirmed by conventional karyotyping or another appropriate technique. All indications for invasive prenatal diagnosis were included. Amniotic fluid and chorionic villus samples were analyzed in equivalent proportions. RESULTS: The failure rate was 3.3% and the overall abnormality detection rate was ~1/10. Eighty-five percent of the detected abnormalities were common aneuploidies. Eleven microdeletions and duplications were identified, thus giving an overall yield for microdeletion and microduplication detection of 1/145. Compared with QF-PCR, Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ provides an additional detection rate of ~1/250 for low-risk pregnancies. The false positive and negative rates were both <1%. CONCLUSION: When associated with conventional karyotyping, the Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ assay combines a short turnaround time (typical of rapid aneuploidy detection tests) with valuable detection of the most frequent microdeletion syndromes that cannot be detected in cytogenetic analyses.