Erradicación de H. pylori y su relación con la resistencia a los antibióticos y el estatus de CYP2C19 / Helicobacter pylori erradication and its relation to antibiotic resistance and CYP2C19 status

Objetivo: determinar la eficacia del rabeprazol (RPZ), amoxicilina (Am) y claritromicina (Cla) (7 vs. 14 días) en la erradicación de H. pylori y determinar el efecto de la resistencia a los antibióticos y el genotipo de CYP2C19. Material y métodos: inicialmente, se determinó el genotipo de CYP2C19 a 100 sujetos sanos para determinar el tamaño de muestra del ensayo clínico. Posteriormente, 59 pacientes H. pylori+ recibieron al azar RPZ (20 mg diarios), Cla (500 mg cada 12 horas) y Am (1.000 mg cada 12 horas) (7 vs. 14 días). Se determinó la CMI para Am y Cla por el método de dilución en agar. El genotipo CYP2C19 fue determinado por PCR-RFLP. Resultados: en el análisis por protocolo (PP), las tasas de erradicación fueron del 89,7 y 72% para los grupos de 7 y 14 días respectivamente (p = 0,159). En el análisis de intención de tratamiento (IT), las tasas de erradicación fueron del 86,7 y 62,1% en los grupos de 7 y 14 días respectivamente (p = 0,06). Ninguna cepa presentó resistencia a Am y 4 cepas fueron resistentes a Cla: 3 (11,1%) en el grupo de 14 días y 1 (4%) en el grupo de 7 días. Las tasas de erradicación no fueron afectadas por la resistencia de la cepa o el genotipo de CYP2C19. Conclusiones: las terapias de 7 y 14 días fueron eficaces para la erradicación de H. pylori. Al parecer, la resistencia de la cepa y el genotipo de CYP2C19, no influenciaron las tasas de erradicación de H. pylori en la población estudiada

Objective: to assess the efficacy of rabeprazole (RPZ), amoxicillin (Am), and clarithromycin (Cla) (7 vs. 14 days) in the eradication of H. pylori, and to determine the effect of strain-specific antibiotic resistance and host CYP2C19 status. Material and methods: first, we determined the CYP2C19 status of 100 healthy subjects to establish a sample size for the clinical trial. Then, 59 H. pylori-infected patients were randomized to receive RPZ (20 mg daily) plus Cla (500 mg b.d.) and Am (1,000 mg b.d.) for 7 vs. 14 days. The MIC for Am and Cla were determined using the agar dilution method. The CYP2C19 genotype was determined by the PCR-RFLP method. Results: in the per-protocol analysis (PP) eradication rates were 89.7 and 72% for the 7- and 14-day groups (p = 0.159). In the intention to-treat analysis (ITT) eradication rates were 86.7 and 62.1% in the 7- and 14-day groups, respectively (p = 0.06). None of the strains was resistant to Am, and 4 strains were resistant to Cla: 3 (11.1%) in the 14-day group and 1 (4%) in the 7- day group. Neither strain-specific antibiotic resistance nor host CYP2C19 status influenced eradication rates. Conclusions: both 7- and 14-day therapies were effective for H. pylori eradication. Strain resistance and CYP2C19 status do not seem to influence eradication rates in the studied population

[Nosocomial bacteremia in the adult patient. Study of associated costs]. / Bacteriemia nosocomial en el paciente adulto. Estudio de costes asociados.

OBJECTIVE: Nosocomial infection causes a prolonged hospital stay and an increase in care costs. The objective of this study was to determine the length of stay excess and costs attributable to nosocomial bacteremia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of clinical records of 148 patients with nosocomial bacteremia during 1996. A matched case-control study was performed. For matching, the following parameters were used: RDG, year of admission, age 10 years, main diagnosis and number of secondary diagnoses. Costs were determined by excess length of hospital stay and calculating alternative costs. RESULTS: Matching was obtained for 100 cases (67.5%) and cost estimation was performed. Compared with cases, non-matched cases showed differences regarding significant issues for cost, such as hospital stay ( p = 0.01), number of empirical (p = 0.001) or definitive antibiotics (p = 0.03). The median hospital stay for cases was longer than for controls (35 vs 15.5 days, respectively; p = 0.000). When only survivor case-control pairs were considered (n = 75), cases remained in hospital for a median of 36 vs 15 days for controls (p = 0.000). Hospital stay days attributable to nosocomial bacteremia were 19.5 for all matched and 21 for matched survivor cases. Only 76% of cases had stay days attributable to bacteremia. Significant differences between cases and controls included: the mean total costs of admission (p = 0.000), cost of stay (p = 0.001), pharmaceutical expenses (p = 0.000), and cost of microbiological studies (p = 0.000), laboratory work-up (p = 0.001) and radiological studies (p = 0.000). Hospital stay represented more than 60% of costs, followed by pharmaceutical expenses. Cost differences between bacteremic patients and controls, calculated in function of stay median, was 4.424 euros (p = 0.000) and 4.744 euros (p = 0.000) for alternative costs. Ten cases showed a difference that represented more than half of the total difference. CONCLUSIONS: Nosocomial bacteremia represent a stay prolongation and a significant economical burden. Hospital stay and pharmaceutical expenses accounted for the most part of the associated costs. The differences in costs obtained with both methods were small. Since not all selected cases were matched, there may be an error in the appreciation of the difference between cases and controls.