Vocal Fold Paresis and Voice Outcomes following Vocal Fold Mass Excision.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate the surgical results of vocal fold mass excision with pre-operative existence of vocal fold paresis. METHODS: Data were collected on 66 patients who underwent excision of benign vocal fold masses from 2015 to 2020. The pre- and post-operative strobovideolaryngoscopy (SVL) examinations for all patients included were evaluated blindly by three otolaryngologists using THE Voice-Vibratory Assessment with Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) Form for scar severity, mucosal wave, free edge contour, glottal closure, and phase closure. The success of mass excision surgery was determined based on the presence of the following criteria post-operatively: 1) improved mucosal wave motion 2) improved phase closure or glottic closure 3) improved free edge contour and 4) lack of worsening of vocal fold scar severity. Surgery was considered successful if 3 or 4 criteria were met, partially successful if 1 or 2 criteria were met, and unsuccessful if no criteria were met. The percent recruitment of the thyroarytenoid, posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA), and cricothyroid muscles were used evaluated the severity of paresis as mild (70-99% recruitment), moderate (40-60% recruitment), or severe (0-39% recruitment). VHI-10 scores were used as subjective measures of pre- and post-operative voice. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (26 male, 40 female) were included in this study, with a mean age of 37.25 ± 16.6 (range 18-78). Twelve patients had no evidence of VF paresis noted during the initial clinical evaluation; and 52 patients had paresis and had undergone laryngeal EMG. 81% of these patients had mild paresis, 12.8% had moderate paresis, and 5.8% had severe paresis. Based on pre- and post-operative strobovideolaryngoscopy, there was improvement in mucosal wave in 44.9% of cases, improvement of phase or glottic closure in 85.4% of cases, improved free edge contour in 95.5% of cases, and worsening of scar in 38.5% of cases. 39.6% of surgeries were fully successful, 33.3% of surgeries were partially successful, and 27.1% were not successful. There was a significant correlation between female gender and vocal fold paresis (P = 0.048). Paresis severity did not correlate with complete or partial surgical success (P = 0.956), pre-operative VHI-10 scores (P = 0.519), post-operative VHI-10 scores (P = 0.563), or strobovideolaryngoscopy parameters. Unilateral and bilateral paresis did not correlate with any other parameter of surgical success (P >0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there is no correlation between pre-operative vocal fold paresis and voice outcomes after mass excision surgery, that the majority of mass excision surgeries (72.9%) are successful based on improvement in stroboscopic parameters, and that the proportion of patients with moderate and severe paresis is consistent across all laryngeal nerves.

Laryngeal Applications of Platelet Rich Plasma and Platelet Poor Plasma: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Platelet rich plasma (PRP) and platelet poor plasma (PPP) are regenerative therapies that offer the potential for improving care for disorders of the larynx. The laryngeal applications of these substances have been examined in both animals and humans. The goal of this systematic review is to examine the various applications of PRP and PPP in laryngology, assess the protocols for preparation and application of these substances and evaluate the outcomes and complications in both humans and animals. METHODS: A search of PUBMED was conducted in April 2021 using combinations of keywords of "platelet rich plasma" and "platelet poor plasma" with keywords such as "larynx," "vocal folds," "laryngology," and others. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRIMSA) guidelines were followed. Articles were reviewed by two independent coauthors and included based on selection criteria pertinent to the goals of this study. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed by two independent co-authors using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials and JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies. Data regarding the pathologies treated using PRP and PPP, PRP, and PPP preparation protocols, application protocols, human voice outcomes, histopathological animal outcomes, and complications were extracted from each of the studies and presented in tables. RESULTS: Seven studies were included based on the selection criteria. PRP or PPP were used for vocal fold scar, sulcus, atrophy and palsy; acute vocal fold injury; glottic insufficiency, and graft healing. PRP or PPP were derived from autologous blood in a one- or two-step centrifugation process and administered via injection, soaking of cartilage grafts or topical application. Mean and median voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10) and voice handicap index (VHI) scores decreased following PRP or PPP injections in two human studies and one human study showed a similar VHI-10 score before and after PRP treatment. Videostroboscopy showed the absence of injection site reactions and at least temporary improvement in glottic gap or vibratory function following treatment in some patients. Other objective measures of voice outcomes in human studies showed improved phonatory function in the one-to-four-month period following PRP or PPP injections, with some patients experiencing a subjective decrease or return to baseline in phonatory function following the initial improvement period. Animal studies found elevated levels of growth factors, organized collagen deposition, decreased granulation tissue, increased vascularization, and increased cartilage proliferation in PRP treated laryngeal tissue. DISCUSSION: PRP and PPP might have the potential to be safely used in the larynx and at least temporarily influence wound healing and vocal function. Further study using comparable outcome measurement tools is required to assess their role and efficacy in treating acute vocal fold injury, chronic vocal fold pathologies, graft healing, and other laryngeal applications.

Voice Outcomes Following Colon Interposition.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This case highlights the consequences of colon interposition on phonation and swallowing. Findings in this patient included laryngopharyngeal reflux, vocal fold paralysis, poor esophageal peristalsis, failed bolus transfers, and others. The mechanical and functional differences between the colon and the esophagus can impact bolus transfer, reflux, and phonation. Further research is required to identify the mechanisms by which colon interposition can impact voice and swallowing.

Laryngeal cleft: A literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Laryngeal cleft is a congenital condition in which an opening in the posterior laryngotracheal wall allows food and liquid to pass from the esophageal lumen to the airway and causes aspiration. The severity of a laryngeal cleft is measured using the Benjamin-Inglis system, and can be managed conservatively or with a variety of surgical options With increased awareness, higher suspicion among primary physicians, advanced technology and improved intensive neonatal care services, more babies with laryngeal clefts survive in the modern era. Therefore, the focus has shifted from infant survival to treatment of laryngeal clefts and the challenging, complex medical conditions they create. OBJECTIVE: To understand current laryngeal cleft management and post-operative outcomes. METHODS: Literature review of laryngeal cleft studies from 2010 to 2021. RESULTS: A total of 1033 patients were included. Based on 415 cases for whom sufficient classification data were available, the predominate symptom for patients with type I, III, and IV clefts is swallowing dysfunction, while the predominant symptoms for patients with type II clefts are stridor and aspiration. A wide variety of comorbidities involving several major organs has been reported with laryngeal clefts, which tend to impact clinical outcomes negatively. Approximately 19% of type I clefts have been treated conservatively successfully, but the majority was treated surgically. Most studies that used injection laryngoplasty for type I clefts reported highly successful repairs without complications or delays in additional procedures. Ninety-eight percent all type II clefts were treated with endoscopic repair; 87% of patients with type III clefts received endoscopic repair; and 66% of patients with type IV clefts underwent open surgery. Approximately 62% of resolved cases were reported within 12 months, while 50.87% of failed cases were reported within 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple treatment approaches, each of which may be applicable depending on factors such as laryngeal cleft type, severity of presentation, and comorbidities. Conservative approaches appear to be most useful for type I clefts or in patients with mild symptoms, while surgical management can be considered for any type of laryngeal cleft. The benefit of injection laryngoplasty, endoscopic repair and open surgery can also vary, but injection laryngoplasty and endoscopic repair are used most commonly. Open surgery should be to be considered if patients present with severe cleft types or if it is unsafe to perform other surgical techniques. Familiarity with this literature review should help clinicians understand clinical characteristics, direct medical management, and guide successful resolution of laryngeal clefts.