Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22272553

RESUMO

Over 15-months we found that anti-spike RBD SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations follow different trends with combinations and permutations of COVID-19 infection and vaccination among healthcare workers in Boston, MA. A majority of HCWs remain well above the positivity threshold for anti-spike RBD IgG antibodies for at least 9 months following vaccination regardless of infection history. Of interest, those with COVID-19 infection before vaccination had significantly higher median serum antibody concentrations in comparison to HCWs with no prior infection at each follow-up timepoint. These findings further support what is known regarding the decline in serum antibody concentrations following natural infection and vaccination, adding knowledge of serum antibodies up to 15 months post infection and 11 months post vaccination. ImportanceBoston Medical Center (BMC) is a safety net hospital in Boston and from the initial wave of COVID-19 there has been overwhelming concern about the exposure of healthcare workers to SARS-CoV-2. We conceived a longitudinal study to assess virus exposure and trends in SARS-CoV-2 antibodies amongst healthcare workers at BMC over 15 months. We have followed HCWs through three waves of COVID-19, including the Delta variant wave from June through mid-December 2021, assessing anti-spike receptor binding domain IgG, anti-nucleocapsid IgG, and anti-spike IgM at approximately three-month intervals. Current literature largely describes antibody durability six months post vaccination. These data add to the literature by describing antibody durability and trend differences according to infection history and vaccination status. These longitudinal data contribute to a greater understanding of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and can help inform future research and public health decision-making regarding vaccine uptake, breakthrough infections, and overall pandemic response.

2.
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21250029

RESUMO

Mask wearing has been advocated by public health officials as a way to reduce the spread of COVID-19. In the United States, policies on mask wearing have varied from state to state over the course of the pandemic. Even as more and more government leaders encourage or even mandate mask wearing, many citizens still resist the notion. Our research examines mask wearing policy and adherence in association with COVID-19 case rates. We used state-level data on mask wearing policy for the general public and on proportion of residents who stated they always wear masks in public. For all 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC), these data were abstracted by month for April September 2020 to measure their impact on COVID-19 rates in the subsequent month (May October 2020). Monthly COVID-19 case rates (number of cases per capita over two weeks) >200 per 100,000 residents were considered high. Fourteen of the 15 states with no mask wearing policy for the general public through September reported a high COVID-19 rate. Of the 8 states with at least 75% mask adherence, none reported a high COVID-19 rate. States with the lowest levels of mask adherence were most likely to have high COVID-19 rates in the subsequent month, independent of mask policy or demographic factors. Mean COVID-19 rates for states with at least 75% mask adherence in the preceding month was 109.26 per 100,000 compared to 249.99 per 100,000 for those with less adherence. Our analysis suggests high adherence to mask wearing could be a key factor in reducing the spread of COVID-19. This association between high mask adherence and reduced COVID-19 rates should influence policy makers and public health officials to focus on ways to improve mask adherence across the population in order to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...