When Is Intensive Care Unit Admission Needed After an Esophagectomy?

INTRODUCTION: Due to the high morbidity associated with esophagectomies, patients are often directly admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) for postoperative monitoring. However, critical complications can arise after this initial ICU stay. We hypothesized that the timing of ICU stay was not optimal for the care of patients after esophagectomy and aimed to determine when patients are at risk for developing critical complications. METHODS: We searched the National Safety and Quality Improvement Program for patients who underwent an esophagectomy between 2016 and 2021. The outcome of interest was the interval between surgery and first critical complication. A critical complication was defined as one likely to require intensive care, including respiratory failure, septic shock, etc. Multivariate regression was performed to identify the risks of complications. RESULTS: This study included 6813 patients from more than 70 institutions. Within the first 30 d postesophagectomy, 21.59% of patients experienced at least one critical complication. Half of first critical complications occurred after postoperative day 5, and 85.05% of them occurred after postoperative day 2. Risk factors for critical complications included age greater than 60 y, preoperative comorbidities, and open surgical approach. Malignancies were associated with a significantly lower incidence of critical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Critical complications occurred beyond the immediate postesophagectomy period. Therefore, low-risk patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomies can be safely monitored outside the ICU, allowing for better patient care and resource utilization.

Hospital readmission after blunt traumatic rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions are resource intensive, associated with increased morbidity, and often used as hospital-level quality indicators. The factors that determine hospital readmission after blunt thoracic trauma have not been sufficiently defined. We sought to identify predictors of hospital readmission in patients with traumatic rib fractures. METHODS: We performed an 8-year (2011-2019) retrospective chart review of patients with traumatic rib fractures who required unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge at a Level 1 trauma center. Patient characteristics, injury severity, and hospital complications were examined using quantitative analysis to identify readmission risk factors. RESULTS: There were 13,046 trauma admissions during the study period. The traumatic rib fracture cohort consisted of 3,720 patients. The cohort included 206 patients who were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. The mean age of the traumatic rib fracture cohort was 57 years, with a 6-day median length of stay. The 30-day mortality rate was 5%. Use of anticoagulation (11.0 vs. 5.4; p = 0.029), diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder (10.2 vs. 5.3; p = 0.01), active smoking (7.3 vs. 5.0; p = 0.008), associated hemothorax (8.3 vs. 5.2; p = 0.010), higher abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale (33.3 vs. 8.4 vs. 6.5; p = 0.002), rapid response activation (8.9 vs. 5.2; p = 0.005), admission to intensive care unit (7.7 vs. 4.5; p = 0.001), and diagnosis of in-hospital pneumonia (10.1 vs. 5.4; p = 0.022) were predictors of hospital readmission. On multivariate analysis, prescribed anticoagulation (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; p = 0.033), active smoking (OR, 1.58; p = 0.004), higher abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale (OR, 1.50; p = 0.054), and diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder (OR, 2.00; p = 0.016) predicted hospital readmission. CONCLUSION: In patients with traumatic rib fractures, those with anticoagulant use, those who actively smoke, those with a psychiatric diagnosis, or those with associated abdominal injuries are at the highest risk of rehospitalization following discharge. Quality improvement should focus on strategies and protocols directed toward these groups to reduce nonelective readmissions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Emergent robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for perforated gastrojejunal ulcers: a retrospective cohort study of 44 patients.

BACKGROUND: Perforated gastrojejunal ulcers are a known complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery requiring emergent surgical repair. The robotic approach has not been evaluated for emergency general surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2019 was performed identifying all patients who underwent repair of perforated gastrojejunal ulcers after RYGB at a single institution. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared by robotic or laparoscopic approach. RESULTS: Of the 44 patients analyzed, there were 24 robotic and 20 laparoscopic repairs of perforated gastrojejunal ulcers. No patients were initially approached with open surgery. In-room-to-surgery-start time was significantly faster in the robotic group than the laparoscopic group (25 versus 31 min, p = 0.01). Complication rate, complication severity, operating time, hospital length of stay, postoperative vasopressor requirement, discharge to home, hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission were all improved in the robotic group, although these were not statistically significant. Both total inpatient and procedural costs were more in the robotic group than the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSION: Perforated hollow viscus is not a contraindication for the use of the surgical robot, which may improve outcomes.

Team Approach: Evaluation and Management of Pelvic Ring Injuries.

A multidisciplinary approach to the management of pelvic ring injuries has been shown to decrease mortality rates. The primary goals within the emergency room are to assess, resuscitate, and stabilize the patient. The Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol guides the initial assessment of the patient. A pelvic binder or sheet should be applied to help to provide reduction of the fracture and temporary stabilization. The trauma team becomes the primary service for the patient as he or she transitions away from the emergency department. The trauma team must effectively communicate with and serve as the liaison between other specialists as injuries are identified. emodynamic stability should be closely monitored in patients with pelvic ring injuries, involving the assessment of vital signs, imaging findings, and clinical judgment. Angioembolization and peritoneal packing may play a role in helping to control hemorrhage. Urologists should be consulted if a Foley catheter cannot be passed or there is concern for urethral or bladder injury. Further imaging or urologic intervention may be necessary. Orthopaedic surgeons can help to assess the patient, classify the injury, and assist in temporary stabilization while planning definitive fixation.

Robotic approach to a subcarinal functional paraganglioma.

INTRO: Functional mediastinal paragangliomas arise from extra-adrenal tissues and are rare. These cases create challenges related to diagnosis, peri-operative management, and surgical management. We present a case that demonstrates a planned robot-assisted thoracoscopic resection of a mediastinal paraganglioma that ultimately required a trans-sternal resection of the tumor off the left atrium. CASE REPORT: Our patient is a 42-year-old male with a prolonged history of refractory hypertension, palpitations, headaches, and diaphoresis, which led to the discovery of a subcarinal functional mediastinal paraganglioma. The patient was brought to the operating room for a right robotic-assisted thoracoscopic subcarinal dissection with attempted resection of the mass. Subsequently, the patient's paraganglioma was successfully resected off the left atrium using a trans-sternal approach, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cardioplegic arrest. He was successfully transitioned to minimal anti-hypertensive medication post-operatively. DISCUSSION: Pheochromocytomas are neural-crest derived tumors that typically arise from the adrenal medulla. Rarely, paragangliomas arise in the thoracic cavity, at an approximate incidence of 2%. Our sequential approach offered the potential for a minimally invasive resection, and though initially unsuccessful, safely elucidated the feasibility of resection using cardiopulmonary bypass after confirming no invasion of the airway, esophagus, or other mediastinal structures.