RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of surgical technique in regard to morbidity and mortality after neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer. BACKGROUND: The SAKK trial 75/08 was a multicenter phase III trial (NCT01107639) comparing induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients in the control arm received induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel, followed by concomitant chemoradiation therapy with cisplatin, docetaxel, and 45Gy. In the experimental arm, the same regimen was used with addition of cetuximab. After completion of neoadjuvant treatment, patients underwent esophagectomy. The experimental arm received adjuvant cetuximab. Surgical outcomes and complications were prospectively recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Total of 259 patients underwent esophagectomy. Overall complication rate was 56% and reoperation rate was 15% with no difference in complication rates for transthoracic versus transhiatal resections (56% vs 54%, P = 0.77), nor for video assisted thoracic surgeries (VATS) versus open transthoracic resections (67% vs 55%, P = 0.32). There was a trend to higher overall complication rates in squamous cell carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma (65% vs 51%, P = 0.035), and a significant difference in ARDS in squamous cell carcinoma with 14% versus 2% in adenocarcinoma (P = 0.0002). For patients with involved lymph nodes, a lymph node ratio of ≥0.1 was an independent predictor of PFS (HR 2.5, P = 0.01) and OS (HR 2.2, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This trial showed no difference in surgical complication rates between transthoracic and transhiatal resections. For patients with involved lymph nodes, lymph node ratio was an independent predictor of progression free survival and overall survival.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Cetuximab/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Esofagectomia/métodos , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) inhere impaired peripheral insulin action leading to higher perioperative morbidity and mortality rates, with hospital-acquired infections being one important complication. This post hoc, observational study aimed to analyze the impact of surgical and metabolic stress as defined by the surrogate marker hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), in relation to self-reported DM2, on perioperative infection rates in a subcohort of the Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Trial population. METHODS: All patients of the SSI study were screened for HbA1c levels measured perioperatively for elective or emergency surgery and classified according to the American Diabetes Association HbA1c cutoff values. SSI and nosocomial infections, self-reported state of DM2 and type of surgery (minor, major) were assessed. RESULTS: HbA1c levels were measured in 139 of 5175 patients (2.7%) of the complete SSI study group. Seventy patients (50.4%) self-reported DM2, while 69 (49.6%) self-reported to be non-diabetic. HbA1c levels indicating pre-diabetes were found in 48 patients (34.5%) and diabetic state in 64 patients (46%). Forty-five patients of the group self-reporting no diabetes (65.2%) were previously unaware of their metabolic derangement (35 pre-diabetic and 10 diabetic). Eighteen infections were detected. Most infections (17 of 18 events) were found in patients with HbA1c levels indicating pre-/diabetic state. The odds for an infection was 3.9-fold (95% CI 1.4 to 11.3) higher for patients undergoing major compared to minor interventions. The highest percentage of infections (38.5%) was found in the group of patients with an undiagnosed pre-/diabetic state undergoing major surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These results encourage investment in further studies evaluating a more generous and specific use of HbA1c screening in patients without self-reported diabetes undergoing major surgery. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01790529.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Biomarcadores , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate whether teaching procedures and surgical experience are associated with surgical site infection (SSI) rates. METHODS: This prospective cohort study of patients undergoing general, orthopedic trauma and vascular surgery procedures was done between 2012 and 2015 at two tertiary care hospitals in Switzerland/Europe. RESULTS: Out of a total of 4560 patients/surgeries, 1403 (30.8%) were classified as teaching operations. The overall SSI rate was 5.1% (n = 233). Teaching operations (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57-1.07, p = 0.120), junior surgeons (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55-1.15, p = 0.229) and surgical experience (OR 0.997, 95% CI 0.982-1.012, p = 0.676) were overall not independently associated with the odds of SSI. However, for surgeons' seniority and experience, these associations depended on the duration of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In procedures of shorter and medium duration, teaching procedures and junior as well as less experienced surgeons are not independently associated with increased odds of SSI.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/educação , Salas Cirúrgicas , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/educação , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/educação , Competência Clínica , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Suíça/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common surgical complications that lead to increased costs. Depending on payer type, however, they do not necessarily translate into deficits for every hospital. OBJECTIVE: We investigated how surgical site infections (SSIs) influence the contribution margin in 2 reimbursement systems based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). METHODS: This preplanned observational health cost analysis was nested within a Swiss multicenter randomized controlled trial on the timing of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in general surgery between February 2013 and August 2015. A simulation of cost and income in the National Health Service (NHS) England reimbursement system was conducted. RESULTS: Of 5,175 patients initially enrolled, 4,556 had complete cost and income data as well as SSI status available for analysis. SSI occurred in 228 of 4,556 of patients (5%). Patients with SSIs were older, more often male, had higher BMIs, compulsory insurance, longer operations, and more frequent ICU admissions. SSIs led to higher hospital cost and income. The median contribution margin was negative in cases of SSI. In SSI cases, median contribution margin was Swiss francs (CHF) -2045 (IQR, -12,800 to 4,848) versus CHF 895 (IQR, -2,190 to 4,158) in non-SSI cases. Higher ASA class and private insurance were associated with higher contribution margins in SSI cases, and ICU admission led to greater deficits. Private insurance had a strong increasing effect on contribution margin at the 10th, 50th (median), and 90th percentiles of its distribution, leading to overall positive contribution margins for SSIs in Switzerland. The NHS England simulation with 3,893 patients revealed similar but less pronounced effects of SSI on contribution margin. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on payer type, reimbursement systems with DRGs offer only minor financial incentives to the prevention of SSI.
Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , SuíçaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Long-duration surgery requires repeated administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis (amp). Amp "redosing" reduces incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) but is frequently omitted. Clinical relevance of redosing timing needs to be investigated. Here, we evaluated the effects of compliance with amp redosing and its timing on SSI incidence in prolonged duration surgery. METHODS: Data from >9000 patients undergoing visceral, trauma, or vascular surgery with elective or emergency treatment in two tertiary referral Swiss hospitals were analyzed. All patients had to receive amp preoperatively and redosing, if indicated. Antibiotics used were cefuroxime (1.5 or 3 g, if weight >80 kg), or cefuroxime and metronidazole (1.5 and 0.5 g, or 3 and 1 g doses, if weight >80 kg). Alternatively, in cases of known or suspected allergies, vancomycin (1 g), gentamicin (4 mg/Kg), and metronidazole or clindamycin (300 mg) with or without ciprofloxacin (400 mg) were used. Association of defined parameters, including wound class, ASA scores, and duration of operation, with SSI incidence was explored. RESULTS: In the whole cohort, SSI incidence significantly correlated with duration of surgery (ρ = 0.73, p = 0.031). In 593 patients undergoing >240 min long interventions, duration of surgery was the only parameter significantly (p < 0.001) associated with increased SSI risk, whereas wound class, ASA scores, treatment areas, and emergency versus elective hospital entry were not. Redosing significantly reduced SSI incidence as shown by multivariate analysis (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.96, p = 0.034), but exact timing had no significant impact. CONCLUSIONS: Long-duration surgery associates with higher SSI incidence. Irrespective of its exact timing, amp redosing significantly decreases SSI risk.
Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Duração da Cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Functional outcomes of different reconstruction techniques have an impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), but information on long-term QoL is lacking. We compared QoL among three reconstruction techniques after total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS: Quality of life was assessed within a randomized, multicenter trial comparing rectal surgery using side-to-end anastomosis (SEA), colon J-pouch (CJP), and straight colorectal anastomosis (SCA) by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal scale (FACT-C) before randomization and every 6 months up to 2 years post-TME. The primary QoL endpoint was the change in the Trial Outcome Index (TOI), including the FACT-C subscales of physical and functional well-being and colorectal cancer symptoms (CSS), from baseline to month 12. Pair-wise comparisons of changes from baseline (presurgery) to each timepoint between the three arms were analyzed by Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: For the QoL analysis, 257 of 336 randomized patients were in the per protocol evaluation (SEA = 95; CJP = 63; SCA = 99). Significant differences between the reconstruction techniques were found for selected QoL scales up to 12 months, all in favor of CJP. Patients with SEA or SCA reported a clinically relevant deterioration for TOI and CSS at 6 months, those with SCA for CSS also at 12 months after TME. Patients with CJP remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Although the three reconstruction techniques differ in their effects on QoL at months 6 and 12, these differences did not persist over the whole observation period of 24 months. Patients with a colon J-pouch may benefit with respect to QoL in the short-term.
Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Bolsas Cólicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Reto/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Reto/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The long-term follow up data of 2 prospective phase II trials is reported (NCT00072033, NCT00445861), which investigated neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Postoperative complications as well as prognostic factors and patterns of relapse during long-term observation are shown. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Long-term follow-up is often missing in the complex setting of multimodal treatments of esophageal carcinoma; this leads to rather undifferentiated follow-up guidelines for this tumor entity. METHODS: In the first trial, patients received induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery. In the second trial, cetuximab was added to the same neoadjuvant treatment concomitant with induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients underwent surgery; the median follow-up time was 6.8 and 6.4 years, respectively. Fifty-five percent were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, 80% clinically node-positive, 68% received transthoracic esophagectomy, and 32% transhiatal or transmediastinal resection. Five patients died postoperatively in-hospital due to complications (6%). The median overall survival was 4.3 years, and the median event-free survival was 2.7 years. Patients with adenocarcinoma rarely relapsed after a 3-year event-free survival. Whereas patients with residual tumor cells after neoadjuvant therapy primarily experienced relapse within the first 2 postoperative years, this in contrast to several patients with complete remission who also experienced late relapses 4 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: After curative surgery in a multimodal setting, the histological type and the response to neoadjuvant therapy predicted the time frame of relapse; this knowledge may influence further follow-up guidelines for esophageal carcinoma.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Terapia Combinada , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Quimioterapia de Indução/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Suíça/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare, in a phase 3, prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical trial functional outcome of reconstruction procedures following total mesorectal excision (TME). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Intestinal continuity reconstruction following TME is accompanied by postoperative defecation dysfunctions known as "anterior resection syndrome." Commonly used reconstruction techniques are straight colorectal anastomosis (SCA), colon J -pouch (CJP), and side-to-end anastomosis (SEA). Comparison of their functional outcomes in prospective, randomized, multi-center studies, including long-term assessments, is lacking. METHODS: Patients requiring TME for histologically proven rectal tumor, with or without neoadjuvant treatment, age ≥ 18 years, normal sphincter function without history of incontinence, any pretreatment staging or adenoma, expected R0-resection, were randomized for standardized SCA, CJP, or SEA procedures. Primary endpoint was comparison of composite evacuation scores 12 months after TME. Comparison of composite evacuation and incontinence scores at 6, 18 and 24 months after surgery, morbidity, and overall survival represented secondary endpoints. Analysis was based on "per protocol" (PP) population, fully complying with trial requirements, and intention-to treat (ITT) population. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-six patients from 15 hospitals were randomized. PP population included 257 patients (JCP = 63; SEA = 95; SCA = 99). Composite evacuation scores of PP and ITT populations did not show statistically significant differences among the 3 groups at any time point. Similarly, composite incontinence scores for PP and ITT populations showed no statistically significant difference among the 3 trial arms at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Within boundaries of investigated procedures, surgeons in charge may continue to perform reconstruction of intestinal continuity following TME at their technical preference.
Assuntos
Colo/cirurgia , Bolsas Cólicas , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Suíça , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical drains are widely used despite limited evidence in their favor. This study describes the associations between drains and surgical site infections (SSI). METHODS: This prospective observational double center study was performed in Switzerland between February 2013 and August 2015. RESULTS: The odds of SSI in the presence of drains were increased in general (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.32-4.30, pâ¯=â¯0.004), but less in vascular and not in orthopedic trauma surgery. In addition to the surgical division, the association between drains and SSI depended significantly on the duration of surgery (pâ¯=â¯0.01) and wound class (pâ¯=â¯0.034). Furthermore, the duration of drainage (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.15-1.35, pâ¯<â¯0.001), the number (OR 1.74, 95%CI 1.09-2.74, pâ¯=â¯0.019) and type of drains (open versus closed: OR 3.68, 95%CI 1.88, 6.89, pâ¯<â¯0.001) as well as their location (overall pâ¯=â¯0.002) were significantly associated with SSI. CONCLUSIONS: The general use of drains is discouraged. However, drains may be beneficial in specific surgical procedures.
Assuntos
Drenagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , SuíçaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. Postoperative and total hospital length of stay (LOS) are known to be prolonged by the occurrence of SSI. Preoperative LOS may increase the risk of SSI. This study aims at identifying the associations of pre- and postoperative LOS in hospital and intensive care with the occurrence of SSI. METHODS: This observational cohort study includes general, orthopedic trauma and vascular surgery patients at two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland between February 2013 and August 2015. The outcome of interest was the 30-day SSI rate. RESULTS: We included 4596 patients, 234 of whom (5.1%) experienced SSI. Being admitted at least 1 day before surgery compared to same-day surgery was associated with a significant increase in the odds of SSI in univariate analysis (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.25-2.21, p < 0.001). More than 1 day compared to 1 day of preoperative hospital stay did not further increase the odds of SSI (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.77-1.50, p = 0.658). Preoperative admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) increased the odds of SSI as compared to hospital admission outside of an ICU (OR 2.19, 95% CI 0.89-4.59, p = 0.057). Adjusting for potential confounders in multivariable analysis weakened the effects of both preoperative admission to hospital (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.99-1.93, p = 0.061) and to the ICU (OR 1.89, 95% CI 0.73-4.24, p = 0.149). CONCLUSION: There was no significant independent association between preoperative length of stay and risk of SSI while SSI and postoperative LOS were significantly associated.
Assuntos
Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Pós-Operatório , Período Pré-Operatório , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Suíça/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several studies investigated the impact of preoperative weight loss on bariatric surgery outcome. However, they mostly focus on small groups of patients or lack updated statistical support. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-nine consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic, proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at our institution between September 2009 and November 2015 were studied. Patients were operated by the same surgeon, applying a standardized technique and followed a 500-kcal/day preoperative diet, starting 14 days before surgery. Body weight was measured before diet, at surgery, and at least three times postoperatively. A linear mixed effects (LME) model and Benedict and Harris formula were used to assess association of pre- and postoperative weight loss up to 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients' (184 females) initial weight was 121.7 kg (females 117.2 kg; males 136.6 kg). They lost on average 5.3 kg (females 4.7 kg; males 7.0 kg) pre- and 36.8 kg (females 36.7 kg; males 37.0 kg) postoperatively, within 2 years. Average excess weight loss (EWL) was 67.2% (females 66.6%; males 67.4%). In 205 patients (154 females), EWL exceeded 50%. Longitudinal data analysis according to LME showed a significant impact of pre- on postoperative weight loss (p < 0.001, likelihood-ratio test, LRT). These effects were undetectable if patients were evaluated by non-parametric analysis based on application of the Benedict and Harris formula. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative dietary success is associated with postoperative weight loss. Effects predicted by the LME model are most pronounced in the first 4-6 months after surgery and are fading away within 24 months postoperatively. External factors not considered in this study might dominate in later phases.
Assuntos
Dieta Redutora , Derivação Gástrica , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Redução de Peso , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Dieta , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/dietoterapia , Período Pós-Operatório , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgiões , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Routine preoperative blood work is not recommended but selected biochemical markers may predict the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). This study examines the association between preoperative biochemical markers and the risk of SSI. METHODS: This observational cohort study, nested in a randomized controlled trial, was conducted at two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland. RESULTS: 122 (5.8%) of 2093 patients experienced SSI. Preoperative increasing levels of albumin (OR 0.93), CRP (OR 1.34), hemoglobin (OR 0.87) and eGFR (OR 0.90) were significantly associated with the odds of SSI. The same accounts for categorized parameters. The highest area under the curve from ROC curves was 0.62 for albumin. Positive predictive values ranged from 6.4% to 9.5% and negative predictive values from 94.8% to 95.7%. The association of CRP, mildly and moderately decreased eGFR and hemoglobin with the odds of SSI remained significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support generally delaying elective surgery based on preoperative blood results. However, it may be considered in situations with potentially severe sequelae of SSI.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/sangue , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , SuíçaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Based on observational studies, administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) is recommended within 60 min before incision. However, the precise optimum timing is unknown. This trial compared early versus late administration of SAP before surgery. METHODS: In this phase 3 randomised controlled superiority trial, we included general surgery adult inpatients (age ≥18 years) at two Swiss hospitals in Basel and Aarau. Patients were randomised centrally and stratified by hospital according to a pre-existing computer-generated list in a 1:1 ratio to receive SAP early in the anaesthesia room or late in the operating room. Patients and the outcome assessment team were blinded to group assignment. SAP consisted of single-shot, intravenous infusion of 1·5 g of cefuroxime, a commonly used cephalosporin with a short half-life, over 2-5 min (combined with 500 mg metronidazole in colorectal surgery). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of SSI within 30 days of surgery. The main analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01790529. FINDINGS: Between Feb 21, 2013, and Aug 3, 2015, 5580 patients were randomly assigned to receive SAP early (2798 patients) or late (2782 patients). 5175 patients (2589 in the early group and 2586 in the late group) were analysed. Median administration time was 42 min before incision in the early group (IQR 30-55) and 16 min before incision in the late group (IQR 10-25). Inpatient follow-up rate was 100% (5175 of 5175 patients); outpatient 30-day follow-up rate was 88·8% (4596 of 5175), with an overall SSI rate of 5·1% (234 of 4596). Early administration of SAP did not significantly reduce the risk of SSI compared with late administration (odds ratio 0·93, 95% CI 0·72-1·21, p=0·601). INTERPRETATION: Our findings do not support any narrowing of the 60-min window for the administration of a cephalosporin with a short half-life, thereby obviating the need for increasingly challenging SAP timing recommendations. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation, Hospital of Aarau, University of Basel, Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation, Hippocrate Foundation, and Nora van Meeuwen-Häfliger Foundation.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefuroxima/uso terapêutico , Esquema de Medicação , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients. The administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the risk of surgical site infections . The optimal timing of this procedure is still a matter of debate. While most studies suggest that it should be given as close to the incision time as possible, others conclude that this may be too late for optimal prevention of surgical site infections. A large observational study suggests that surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered 74 to 30 minutes before surgery. The aim of this article is to report the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial investigating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. METHODS/DESIGN: In this bi-center randomized controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland, we plan to include 5,000 patients undergoing general, oncologic, vascular and orthopedic trauma procedures. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: one receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (75 to 30 minutes before incision) and the other receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room (less than 30 minutes before incision). We expect a significantly lower rate of surgical site infections with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis administered more than 30 minutes before the scheduled incision. The primary outcome is the occurrence of surgical site infections during a 30-day follow-up period (one year with an implant in place). When assuming a 5% surgical site infection risk with administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room, the planned sample size has an 80% power to detect a relative risk reduction for surgical site infections of 33% when administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (with a two-sided type I error of 5%). We expect the study to be completed within three years. DISCUSSION: The results of this randomized controlled trial will have an important impact on current international guidelines for infection control strategies in the hospital. Moreover, the results of this randomized controlled trial are of significant interest for patient safety and healthcare economics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01790529.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Protocolos Clínicos , Esquema de Medicação , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Suíça , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSI) are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients, with significant impact on patient morbidity and health care costs. The Basel SSI Cohort Study was performed to evaluate risk factors and validate current preventive measures for SSI. The objective of the present article was to review the main results of this study and its implications for clinical practice and future research. SUMMARY OF METHODS OF THE BASEL SSI COHORT STUDY: The prospective observational cohort study included 6,283 consecutive general surgery procedures closely monitored for evidence of SSI up to 1 year after surgery. The dataset was analysed for the influence of various potential SSI risk factors, including timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP), glove perforation, anaemia, transfusion and tutorial assistance, using multiple logistic regression analyses. In addition, post hoc analyses were performed to assess the economic burden of SSI, the efficiency of the clinical SSI surveillance system, and the spectrum of SSI-causing pathogens. REVIEW OF MAIN RESULTS OF THE BASEL SSI COHORT STUDY: The overall SSI rate was 4.7% (293/6,283). While SAP was administered in most patients between 44 and 0 minutes before surgical incision, the lowest risk of SSI was recorded when the antibiotics were administered between 74 and 30 minutes before surgery. Glove perforation in the absence of SAP increased the risk of SSI (OR 2.0; CI 1.4-2.8; p <0.001). No significant association was found for anaemia, transfusion and tutorial assistance with the risk of SSI. The mean additional hospital cost in the event of SSI was CHF 19,638 (95% CI, 8,492-30,784). The surgical staff documented only 49% of in-hospital SSI; the infection control team registered the remaining 51%. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common SSI-causing pathogen (29% of all SSI with documented microbiology). No case of an antimicrobial-resistant pathogen was identified in this series. CONCLUSIONS: The Basel SSI Cohort Study suggested that SAP should be administered between 74 and 30 minutes before surgery. Due to the observational nature of these data, corroboration is planned in a randomized controlled trial, which is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. Routine change of gloves or double gloving is recommended in the absence of SAP. Anaemia, transfusion and tutorial assistance do not increase the risk of SSI. The substantial economic burden of in-hospital SSI has been confirmed. SSI surveillance by the surgical staff detected only half of all in-hospital SSI, which prompted the introduction of an electronic SSI surveillance system at the University Hospital of Basel and the Cantonal Hospital of Aarau. Due to the absence of multiresistant SSI-causing pathogens, the continuous use of single-shot single-drug SAP with cefuroxime (plus metronidazole in colorectal surgery) has been validated.
Assuntos
Controle de Infecções/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Anemia/complicações , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Cefuroxima/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Seguimentos , Luvas Cirúrgicas , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Análise Multivariada , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Suíça , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of implementation of the refined window for routine antimicrobial prophylaxis (RAP) of 30-74 minutes before skin incision compared to the World Health Organization (WHO) standard of 0-60 minutes. DESIGN: Prospective study on timing of routine antimicrobial prophylaxis in 2 different time periods. SETTING: Tertiary referral university hospital with 30,000 surgical procedures per year. METHODS: In all consecutive vascular, visceral, and trauma procedures, the timing was prospectively recorded during a first time period of 2 years (A; baseline) and a second period of 1 year (B; after intervention). An intensive intervention program was initiated after baseline. The primary outcome parameter was timing; the secondary outcome parameter was surgical site infection (SSI) rate in the subgroup of patients undergoing cholecystectomy/colon resection. RESULTS: During baseline time period A (3,836 procedures), RAP was administered 30-74 minutes before skin incision in 1,750 (41.0%) procedures; during time period B (1,537 procedures), it was administered in 914 (56.0%; [Formula: see text]). The subgroup analysis did not reveal a significant difference in SSI rate. CONCLUSIONS: This bundle of interventions resulted in a statistically significant improvement of timing of RAP even at a shortened window compared to the WHO standard.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Cefalosporinas/administração & dosagem , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/normas , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Colecistectomia , Estudos de Coortes , Colectomia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The type of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is determined by the spectrum and antimicrobial resistance of pathogens causing surgical site infections (SSI). The aim of this study was to define the microbiological features of SSI in general surgery patients at Basel University Hospital in order to validate our current strategy of single-shot SAP with 1.5 g cefuroxime (plus 500 mg metronidazole in colorectal surgery). METHODS: A prospective observational cohort of consecutive vascular, visceral and trauma procedures was analysed to evaluate the incidence of SSI. Surgical wounds and resulting infections were assessed to centres for disease control standards. Microbiological evaluation was performed by microscopic direct preparation, cultures and testing for antibiotic resistance. RESULTS: A total of 293 instances of SSI were detected in this cohort of 6283 surgical procedures (4.7%). Microbiological species were identified in 129 of 293 SSI (44%). Staphylococcus aureus (29.5%) was the most common pathogen causing SSI in trauma and vascular surgery, whereas Escherichia coli (20.9%) was more frequently responsible for SSI in visceral surgery. Importantly, not a single case of SSI was caused by antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in this series. CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of pathogens causing SSI identified and the very low incidence of antimicrobial resistance at Basel University Hospital validate the continuous use of single-shot single-drug SAP with cefuroxime (plus metronidazole in colorectal surgery).
Assuntos
Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Cefuroxima/administração & dosagem , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Humanos , Incidência , Metronidazol/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Suíça/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Fecal incontinence is underestimated in its prevalence. Therapeutic approaches vary; in mild-to-moderate cases, dietary changes and biofeedback sessions accompanied by specific medications can achieve a salutary effect. In cases of severe fecal incontinence, a conservative approach is ineffective and surgical intervention is indicated. However, several technical innovations and devices enable surgeons to offer patients reliable solutions for this functional disorder. While dynamic graciloplasty uses native muscle contraction ability to function as a new sphincter, the artificial bowel sphincter achieves the same goal by an inflatable cuff. A novel approach, which is suitable for selected patients with muscular and neurological defects alike, is the sacral nerve stimulator. It is crucial to choose the right procedure as determined by the underlying pathology.
Assuntos
Incontinência Fecal , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Biorretroalimentação Psicológica , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Incontinência Fecal/diagnóstico , Incontinência Fecal/diagnóstico por imagem , Incontinência Fecal/fisiopatologia , Incontinência Fecal/cirurgia , Incontinência Fecal/terapia , Humanos , Plexo Lombossacral/fisiologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Implantação de Prótese , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
HYPOTHESIS: Clinically apparent surgical glove perforation increases the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: University Hospital Basel, with an average of 28,000 surgical interventions per year. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive series of 4147 surgical procedures performed in the Visceral Surgery, Vascular Surgery, and Traumatology divisions of the Department of General Surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome of interest was SSI occurrence as assessed pursuant to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention standards. The primary predictor variable was compromised asepsis due to glove perforation. RESULTS: The overall SSI rate was 4.5% (188 of 4147 procedures). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed a higher likelihood of SSI in procedures in which gloves were perforated compared with interventions with maintained asepsis (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.8; P < .001). However, multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the increase in SSI risk with perforated gloves was different for procedures with vs those without surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (test for effect modification, P = .005). Without antimicrobial prophylaxis, glove perforation entailed significantly higher odds of SSI compared with the reference group with no breach of asepsis (adjusted OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.7-10.8; P = .003). On the contrary, when surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was applied, the likelihood of SSI was not significantly higher for operations in which gloves were punctured (adjusted OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.9; P = .26). CONCLUSION: Without surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, glove perforation increases the risk of SSI.