Antiviral treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the current situation: a position paper of the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES). / Posicionamiento de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES) ante el tratamiento antiviral frente al SARS-CoV-2 en la situación epidemiológica actual.

SUMMARY: COVID-19 continues to pose a significant threat: mortality stands at nearly twice that of influenza, and the incidence rate is growing as the population's vaccination rate decreases, particularly in Spain and other areas of Europe. Given this situation, it is vitally important know whether medical protocols are consistent and appropriately implemented by health care staff in the interest of preventing possible inefficiency or inequity. Physicians from hospital emergency departments met to study their hospitals' usual clinical practices for managing SARS-CoV-2 infection and to determine their expert opinions on the use of antiviral agents. The participating physicians then reached consensus on evidencebased recommendations for strategies that would optimize emergency treatment.

RESUMEN: Actualmente, la COVID-19 sigue representando una amenaza significativa, con una mortalidad cercana al doble de la ocasionada por la gripe y con una incidencia variable debido a una disminución en la tasa de vacunación de la población, especialmente en el contexto europeo y español. Ante este panorama, es de vital importancia comprobar que los protocolos médicos están consolidados y son debidamente implementados por los profesionales sanitarios, con la finalidad de evitar posibles ineficiencias o inequidades. A través de reuniones con profesionales de urgencias se han observado las prácticas clínicas habituales en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios para pacientes con infección por SARS-CoV-2, con la finalidad de comprender la perspectiva de estos profesionales acerca del uso de antivirales y, tras un consenso de expertos basados en la evidencia actual, se han generado estas de recomendaciones para poder enfocar estrategias que optimicen el tratamiento de los pacientes en estos servicios.

Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in primary care. / Utilidad de la ecografía en el cribado del aneurisma de aorta abdominal en atención primaria.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) constitutes a pathology with high mortality. There is currently no screening program implemented in primary care in Spain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usefulness of ultrasound in the detection of AAA in the at-risk population in primary care. Secondarily, to identify subjects whose vascular risk (VR) should be reclassified and to determine whether AAA is associated with the presence of carotid plaque and other risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive, multicenter, national, descriptive study in primary care. SUBJECTS: A consecutive selection of hypertensive males aged between 65 and 75 who are either smokers or former smokers, or individuals over the age of 50 of both sexes with a family history of AAA. MEASUREMENTS: Diameter of abdominal aorta and iliac arteries; detection of abdominal aortic and carotid atherosclerotic plaque. VR was calculated at the beginning and after testing (SCORE). RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients were analyzed (age: 68.3±5 years; 89.3% male). Baseline RV was high/very high in 55.3%. AAA was detected in 12 patients (8%; 95% CI: 4-12); aortic ectasia in 13 (8.7%); abdominal aortic plaque in 44% and carotid plaque in 62% of the participants. VR was reclassified in 50% of subjects. The detection of AAA or ectasia was associated with the presence of carotid plaque, current smoking and lipoprotein(a), p<0.01. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AAA in patients with VR is high. Ultrasound in primary care allows detection of AAA and subclinical atherosclerosis and consequently reclassification of the VR, demonstrating its utility in screening for AAA in the at-risk population.

Demographic and health community-based surveys to inform a malaria elimination project in Magude district, southern Mozambique.

OBJECTIVES: A Demographic and Health Platform was established in Magude in 2015, prior to the deployment of a project aiming to evaluate the feasibility of malaria elimination in southern Mozambique, named the Magude project. This platform aimed to inform the design, implementation and evaluation of the Magude project, through the identification of households and population; and the collection of demographic, health and malaria information. SETTING: Magude is a rural district of southern Mozambique which borders South Africa. It has nine peripheral health facilities and one referral health centre with an inpatient ward. INTERVENTION: A baseline census enumerated and geolocated all the households, and their resident and non-resident members, collecting demographic and socio-economic information, and data on the coverage and usage of malaria control tools. Inpatient and outpatient data during the 5 years (2010 to 2014) before the survey were obtained from the district health authorities. The demographic platform was updated in 2016. RESULTS: The baseline census conducted in 2015 reported 48 448 (92.1%) residents and 4133 (7.9%) non-residents, and 10 965 households. Magude's population is predominantly young, half of the population has no formal education and the main economic activities are agriculture and fishing. Houses are mainly built with traditional non-durable materials and have poor sanitation facilities. Between 2010 and 2014, malaria was the most common cause of all-age inpatient discharges (representing 20% to 40% of all discharges), followed by HIV (12% to 22%) and anaemia (12% to 15%). In early 2015, all-age bed-net usage was between 21.8% and 27.1% and the reported coverage of indoor residual spraying varied across the district between 30.7% and 79%. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that Magude has limited socio-economic conditions, poor access to healthcare services and low coverage of malaria vector control interventions. Thus, Magude represented an area where it is most pressing to demonstrate the feasibility of malaria elimination. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02914145; Pre-results.

Demographic and health community-based surveys to inform a malaria elimination project in magude district, southern Mozambique

Objectives: A Demographic and Health Platform was established in Magude in 2015, prior to the deployment of a project aiming to evaluate the feasibility of malaria elimination in southern Mozambique, named the Magude project. This platform aimed to inform the design, implementation and evaluation of the Magude project, through the identification of households and population; and the collection of demographic, health and malaria information. Setting: Magude is a rural district of southern Mozambique which borders South Africa. It has nine peripheral health facilities and one referral health centre with an inpatient ward. Intervention: A baseline census enumerated and geolocated all the households, and their resident and non-resident members, collecting demographic and socio-economic information, and data on the coverage and usage of malaria control tools. Inpatient and outpatient data during the 5 years (2010 to 2014) before the survey were obtained from the district health authorities. The demographic platform was updated in 2016. Results: The baseline census conducted in 2015 reported 48 448 (92.1%) residents and 4133 (7.9%) non-residents, and 10 965 households. Magude's population is predominantly young, half of the population has no formal education and the main economic activities are agriculture and fishing. Houses are mainly built with traditional non-durable materials and have poor sanitation facilities. Between 2010 and 2014, malaria was the most common cause of all-age inpatient discharges (representing 20% to 40% of all discharges), followed by HIV (12% to 22%) and anaemia (12% to 15%). In early 2015, all-age bed-net usage was between 21.8% and 27.1% and the reported coverage of indoor residual spraying varied across the district between 30.7% and 79%. Conclusion: This study revealed that Magude has limited socio-economic conditions, poor access to healthcare services and low coverage of malaria vector control interventions. Thus, Magude represented an area where it is most pressing to demonstrate the feasibility of malaria elimination.

Dose-response association of physical activity with acute myocardial infarction: do amount and intensity matter?

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to analyze the dose-response association between leisure time physical activity (PA) practice and myocardial infarction (MI), considering not only the total amount but also the amount of PA at different levels of intensity, and to determine whether these associations were modified by age. METHOD: In a population-based age- and sex-matched case-control study, all first acute MI patients aged 25 to 74 years were prospectively registered in four Spanish hospitals between 2002 and 2004. Controls were randomly selected from population-based samples recruited during the same period of time. The Minnesota PA questionnaire was administered to assess total energy expenditure in PA and in light-, moderate-, and high-intensity PA. RESULTS: Finally, 1339 cases and 1339 controls were included. The association between PA and MI likelihood was non-linear, with significantly lower MI odds at low practice levels (≥ 500 MET·min/week), lowest odds around 1500 MET·min/week, and a plateau thereafter. Light- (in subjects older than 64 years), moderate-, and high-intensity PA produced similar benefits. CONCLUSION: Most of the population could reduce their likelihood of MI by engaging in PA at a moderate level of intensity or, in individuals older than 64 years, at a light level of intensity.

Multiple imputation for estimating hazard ratios and predictive abilities in case-cohort surveys.

BACKGROUND: The weighted estimators generally used for analyzing case-cohort studies are not fully efficient and naive estimates of the predictive ability of a model from case-cohort data depend on the subcohort size. However, case-cohort studies represent a special type of incomplete data, and methods for analyzing incomplete data should be appropriate, in particular multiple imputation (MI). METHODS: We performed simulations to validate the MI approach for estimating hazard ratios and the predictive ability of a model or of an additional variable in case-cohort surveys. As an illustration, we analyzed a case-cohort survey from the Three-City study to estimate the predictive ability of D-dimer plasma concentration on coronary heart disease (CHD) and on vascular dementia (VaD) risks. RESULTS: When the imputation model of the phase-2 variable was correctly specified, MI estimates of hazard ratios and predictive abilities were similar to those obtained with full data. When the imputation model was misspecified, MI could provide biased estimates of hazard ratios and predictive abilities. In the Three-City case-cohort study, elevated D-dimer levels increased the risk of VaD (hazard ratio for two consecutive tertiles = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.63-1.74). However, D-dimer levels did not improve the predictive ability of the model. CONCLUSIONS: MI is a simple approach for analyzing case-cohort data and provides an easy evaluation of the predictive ability of a model or of an additional variable.

Multiple imputation analysis of case-cohort studies.

The usual methods for analyzing case-cohort studies rely on sometimes not fully efficient weighted estimators. Multiple imputation might be a good alternative because it uses all the data available and approximates the maximum partial likelihood estimator. This method is based on the generation of several plausible complete data sets, taking into account uncertainty about missing values. When the imputation model is correctly defined, the multiple imputation estimator is asymptotically unbiased and its variance is correctly estimated. We show that a correct imputation model must be estimated from the fully observed data (cases and controls), using the case status among the explanatory variable. To validate the approach, we analyzed case-cohort studies first with completely simulated data and then with case-cohort data sampled from two real cohorts. The analyses of simulated data showed that, when the imputation model was correct, the multiple imputation estimator was unbiased and efficient. The observed gain in precision ranged from 8 to 37 per cent for phase-1 variables and from 5 to 19 per cent for the phase-2 variable. When the imputation model was misspecified, the multiple imputation estimator was still more efficient than the weighted estimators but it was also slightly biased. The analyses of case-cohort data sampled from complete cohorts showed that even when no strong predictor of the phase-2 variable was available, the multiple imputation was unbiased, as precised as the weighted estimator for the phase-2 variable and slightly more precise than the weighted estimators for the phase-1 variables. However, the multiple imputation estimator was found to be biased when, because of interaction terms, some coefficients of the imputation model had to be estimated from small samples. Multiple imputation is an efficient technique for analyzing case-cohort data. Practically, we suggest building the analysis model using only the case-cohort data and weighted estimators. Multiple imputation can eventually be used to reanalyze the data using the selected model in order to improve the precision of the results.

Índice de masa corporal como factor pronóstico en pacientes tras un primer infarto de miocardio / Body mass index in the prognosis of first myocardial infarction

Fundamento y objetivos: El valor del índice de masa corporal en el pronóstico de pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica no está bien definido. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue determinar la asociación del índice de masa corporal con otros factores de riesgo cardiovascular tanto clásicos como emergentes, con la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a los 6 meses en pacientes con un primer infarto de miocardio. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico, con seguimiento a los 6 meses. Se incluyeron 1.063 pacientes entre 25 y 75 años con un primer infarto de miocardio que ingresaron de forma consecutiva dentro de las primeras 24h del inicio de los síntomas entre los años 2001 y 2003. Se determinaron las características demográficas, antropométricas, de factores de riesgo clásicos y emergentes, clínicas y tratamiento recibido. Resultados: El porcentaje de pacientes con sobrepeso u obesidad fue del 73,6 % y presentaban mayor prevalencia de factores de riesgo clásicos -salvo tabaquismo- y emergentes. Tanto en el análisis univariado como en el multivariado el índice de masa corporal no se asoció al pronóstico a 6 meses. Conclusiones: En nuestra población el índice de masa corporal no parece predecir el pronóstico de los pacientes tras un primer infarto de miocardio (AU)

Background and objectives: The value of body mass index in the prognosis of patients with ischemic heart disease is not well defined. The objective of our study was to determine the association of body mass index with classic and emergent cardiovascular risk factors and with intra-hospital and 6-months mortality. Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter study with a 6-months follow-up. We included 1063 patients between the ages of 25–75 years old who were consecutively admitted to the hospital within the first 24 hours of the onset of symptoms between years 2001 and 2003. We determined demographic and anthropometric variables, as well as classic and emergent factors of risk, clinical variables and the treatment administered. We carried out a univariate and multivariate analysis.Results: The percentage of patients with overweight or obesity in this population was 73.56%. Overweight and obesity were associated with classical risk factors, except for smoking, and emergent risk factors. Body mass index was not associated with short-or mid-term prognosis. Conclusions: Body mass index is not a useful anthropometric measure to determine the prognosis of patients after a first myocardial infarction (AU)

Evolución de la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y el pronóstico a seis meses de los pacientes con un primer infarto agudo de miocardio. Cambios en la última década / Trends in in-hospital mortality and six-month outcomes in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction. Change over the last decade

Introducción y objetivos. El tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM) ha cambiado considerablemente en los últimos años. El objetivo es determinar la evolución de la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y del pronóstico a 6 meses de los pacientes que ingresan con un primer IAM en dos registros realizados en 1992-1994 y 2001-2003. Métodos. Entre 1992 y 1994, ingresaron consecutivamente 1.440 pacientes con un primer IAM en cuatro hospitales universitarios (RESCATE I). Entre 2001 y 2003, ingresaron en los mismos centros 1.288 pacientes con un primer IAM con los mismos criterios diagnósticos (RESCATE II). Se compara el manejo clínico, la mortalidad hospitalaria y el pronóstico y la evolución a 6 meses entre estos dos registros. Resultados. Se realizó reperfusión en el 60,7% de los pacientes del primer registro y en el 72,6% del segundo (p < 0,001). En el RESCATE II, se redujo la mediana de tiempo puerta-aguja (41 frente a 93 min; p < 0,001), se realizaron más coronariografías (el 65,2 frente al 28,1%; p < 0,001) y revascularizaciones (el 34,9 frente al 8,1%; p < 0,001). La mortalidad hospitalaria disminuyó en el RESCATE II (el 7,5 frente al 10,9%; p < 0,001). Al ajustar por edad, sexo, comorbilidad, gravedad del IAM y terapia de reperfusión, la odds ratio de mortalidad hospitalaria del RESCATE II, comparada con el primer registro, fue 0,52 (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 0,31-0,86). En el RESCATE II también disminuyó la mortalidad (el 1,4 frente al 3,6%; p = 0,001) y el reingreso a 6 meses. Conclusiones. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 6 meses de los pacientes con un primer IAM ha disminuido en la última década, probablemente debido a que se reperfunde y se revasculariza más y al mejor tratamiento médico (AU)

Introduction and objectives. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has changed considerably in recent years. The objective of this study was to investigate differences in in-hospital mortality and 6-month outcomes after a first AMI between patients who participated in two trials, in 1992-1994 and 2001-2003, respectively. Methods. The study involved 1440 consecutive patients with a first AMI who were admitted to four university hospitals during 1992-1994 (the RESCATE-I trial) and 1288 with a first AMI who met the same diagnostic criteria and who were admitted to the same hospitals during 2001-2003 (the RESCATE-II trial). Patient management, in-hospital mortality and 6-month prognosis and outcomes were compared between the two trials. Results. Reperfusion therapy was carried out in 60.7% of patients in the first trial and in 72.6% in the second (P<.001). In the RESCATE-II trial, the median door-toneedle time was shorter (41 min vs. 93 min; P<.001) and patients more frequently underwent coronary angiography (65.2% vs. 28.1%; P<.001) and revascularization (34.9% vs. 8.1%; P<.001). In addition, in-hospital mortality was lower in RESCATE-II (7.5% vs. 10.9%; P<.001). After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidity, AMI severity and reperfusion therapy, the odds ratio for in-hospital mortality fibrilain RESCATE-II compared with the first trial was 0.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.86). In addition, mortality (1.4% vs. 3.6%; P=.001) and readmissions at 6 months were also lower in RESCATE-II. Conclusions. Both in-hospital and 6-month mortality in patients with a first AMI decreased during the last decade, probably due to more frequent reperfusion and revascularization therapy and better medical treatment (AU)

[Body mass index in the prognosis of first myocardial infarction]. / Índice de masa corporal como factor pronóstico en pacientes tras un primer infarto de miocardio.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The value of body mass index in the prognosis of patients with ischemic heart disease is not well defined. The objective of our study was to determine the association of body mass index with classic and emergent cardiovascular risk factors and with intra-hospital and 6-months mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter study with a 6-months follow-up. We included 1063 patients between the ages of 25-75 years old who were consecutively admitted to the hospital within the first 24 hours of the onset of symptoms between years 2001 and 2003. We determined demographic and anthropometric variables, as well as classic and emergent factors of risk, clinical variables and the treatment administered. We carried out a univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with overweight or obesity in this population was 73.56%. Overweight and obesity were associated with classical risk factors, except for smoking, and emergent risk factors. Body mass index was not associated with short-or mid-term prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Body mass index is not a useful anthropometric measure to determine the prognosis of patients after a first myocardial infarction.

Trends in in-hospital mortality and six-month outcomes in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction. Change over the last decade.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has changed considerably in recent years. The objective of this study was to investigate differences in in-hospital mortality and 6-month outcomes after a first AMI between patients who participated in two trials, in 1992-1994 and 2001-2003, respectively. METHODS: The study involved 1440 consecutive patients with a first AMI who were admitted to four university hospitals during 1992-1994 (the RESCATE-I trial) and 1288 with a first AMI who met the same diagnostic criteria and who were admitted to the same hospitals during 2001-2003 (the RESCATE-II trial). Patient management, in-hospital mortality and 6-month prognosis and outcomes were compared between the two trials. RESULTS: Reperfusion therapy was carried out in 60.7% of patients in the first trial and in 72.6% in the second (P< .001). In the RESCATE-II trial, the median door-to-needle time was shorter (41 min vs. 93 min; P< .001) and patients more frequently underwent coronary angiography (65.2% vs. 28.1%; P< .001) and revascularization (34.9% vs. 8.1%; P< .001). In addition, in-hospital mortality was lower in RESCATE-II (7.5% vs. 10.9%; P< .001). After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidity, AMI severity and reperfusion therapy, the odds ratio for in-hospital mortality in RESCATE-II compared with the first trial was 0.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.86). In addition, mortality (1.4% vs. 3.6%; P=.001) and readmissions at 6 months were also lower in RESCATE-II. CONCLUSIONS: Both in-hospital and 6-month mortality in patients with a first AMI decreased during the last decade, probably due to more frequent reperfusion and revascularization therapy and better medical treatment.

Oxidized LDL, lipoprotein (a) and other emergent risk factors in acute myocardial infarction (FORTIAM study).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without classical risk factors, and to ascertain whether affected patients exhibit a higher prevalence of emergent risk factors and whether the presence of specific emergent risk factors influence prognosis at 6 months. METHODS: The FORTIAM (Factores Ocultos de Riesgo Tras un Infarto Agudo de Miocardio) study is a multicenter cohort study that includes 1371 AMI patients who were admitted within 24 hours of symptom onset. Strict definitions were used for classical risk factors and the concentrations of the following markers were determined: lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine and antibody to Chlamydia. The end-points observed during the 6-month follow-up were death, angina and re-infarction. RESULTS: The prevalence of AMI without classical risk factors was 8.0%. The absence of classical risk factors did not affect the 6-month prognosis. The only emergent risk factors independently associated with a poorer prognosis were the Lp(a) and oxLDL concentrations. Cut-points were determined using smoothing splines: 60 mg/ dL for Lp(a) and 74 U/L for oxLDL. The associated hazard ratios, adjusted for age, sex and classical risk factors, were 1.40 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.84 ) and 1.48 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.06), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of AMI patients without classical risk factors was low and their prognosis was similar to that in other AMI patients. Both oxLDL and Lp(a) concentrations were independently associated with a poorer 6-month prognosis, irrespective of the presence of classical risk factors.

LDL oxidada, lipoproteína(a) y otros factores de riesgo emergentes en el infarto agudo de miocardio (estudio FORTIAM) / Oxidized LDL, lipoprotein (a) and other emergent risk factors in acute myocardial infarction (FORTIAM study)

Introducción y objetivos. Determinar la prevalencia de pacientes que sufren un infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM) sin factores de riesgo (FR) clásicos, si presentan una mayor prevalencia de FR emergentes y si algún FR emergente modifica el pronóstico a 6 meses. Métodos. FORTIAM (Factores Ocultos de Riesgo Tras un Infarto Agudo de Miocardio) es un estudio multicéntrico de cohortes de 1.371 pacientes que sufrieron un IAM e ingresaron en las primeras 24 h. Se utilizaron definiciones estrictas para los FR clásicos y se determinaron: lipoproteína (a) [Lp(a)], lipoproteína de baja densidad oxidada (LDLox), proteína C reactiva ultrasensible, fibrinógeno, homocisteína y anticuerpos anticlamidia. Los acontecimientos de interés a 6 meses fueron: muerte, angina o reIAM. Resultados. La prevalencia de pacientes con IAM sin FR clásicos fue del 8%. La ausencia de FR clásicos no afectó al pronóstico a 6 meses. Lp(a) y LDLox fueron los únicos FR emergentes que de forma independiente se asociaron a un peor pronóstico. Puntos de corte (suavización con splines): 60 mg/dl para Lp(a) y 74 U/l para LDLox. La hazard ratio ajustada por edad, sexo y FR clásicos, 1,40 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 1,06-1,84) y 1,48 (IC del 95%, 1,06-2,06) respectivamente. Conclusiones. La proporción de pacientes con un IAM sin FR clásicos es baja y su pronóstico es similar al resto de pacientes con IAM. LDLox y de Lp(a) se asociaron a un peor pronóstico a 6 meses de forma independientemente de los FR clásicos (AU)

Introduction and objectives. To determine the prevalence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without classical risk factors, and to ascertain whether affected patients exhibit a higher prevalence of emergent risk factors and whether the presence of specific emergent risk factors influence prognosis at 6 months. Methods. The FORTIAM (Factores Ocultos de Riesgo Tras un Infarto Agudo de Miocardio) study is a multicenter cohort study that includes 1371 AMI patients who were admitted within 24 hours of symptom onset. Strict definitions were used for classical risk factors and the concentrations of the following markers were determined: lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine, and antibody to Chlamydia. The endpoints observed during the 6-month follow-up were death, angina, and re-infarction. Results. The prevalence of AMI without classical risk factors was 8.0%. The absence of classical risk factors did not affect the 6-month prognosis. The only emergent risk factors independently associated with a poorer prognosis were the Lp(a) and oxLDL concentrations. Cut- points were determined using smoothing splines: 60 mg/dL for Lp(a) and 74 U/L for oxLDL. The associated hazard ratios, adjusted for age, sex, and classical risk factors, were 1.40 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.84 ) and 1.48 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.06), respectively. Conclusions. The proportion of AMI patients without classical risk factors was low and their prognosis was similar to that in other AMI patients. Both oxLDL and Lp(a) concentrations were independently associated with a poorer 6-month prognosis, irrespective of the presence of classical risk factors. factors was 8.0%. The absence of classical risk factors did not affect the 6-month prognosis. The only emergent risk factors independently associated with a poorer prognosis were the Lp(a) and oxLDL concentrations. Cut-points were determined using smoothing splines: 60 mg/ dL for Lp(a) and 74 U/L for oxLDL. The associated hazard ratios, adjusted for age, sex and classical risk factors, were 1.40 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.84 ) and 1.48 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.06), respectively. Conclusions. The proportion of AMI patients without classical risk factors was low and their prognosis was similar to that in other AMI patients. Both oxLDL and Lp(a) concentrations were independently associated with a poorer 6-month prognosis, irrespective of the presence of classical risk factors (AU)

Hypertension confirmation and blood pressure control rates in epidemiological surveys.

BACKGROUND: Scarce knowledge about hypertension confirmation and control after a single blood pressure (BP) measurement is available. The objective of this study was to evaluate hypertension confirmation and control rates after 6-year follow-up in a population-based cohort. METHODS: A cohort of 1748 participants representative of a Spanish population received standardized BP measurements. Systolic BP>or=140 mmHg or diastolic BP>or=90 mmHg was found in 617 participants. Three hundred and thirty-four of them had no history of hypertension and the remaining 283 had been previously diagnosed or received antihypertensive treatment. All were advised to consult their physicians. We discarded for follow-up 109 participants with already well-controlled hypertension (27.8% of all hypertensive participants). We followed 583 participants (94.5% of the cohort) for 6 years (14 died and 20 were lost to follow-up). RESULTS: The diagnosis of hypertension was confirmed during follow-up in 139 (44.4%) of those with no previously known hypertension, making the overall prevalence for the cohort equal to 30.4% (n=531). The hypertension control rate at the end of follow-up was 50.1%, whereas it was 27.9% at baseline. Diabetes was the only factor to be independently associated with good control of hypertension. CONCLUSION: Six years after a single-occasion blood pressure measurement, hypertension was confirmed in almost half of the participants with systolic BP>or=140 mmHg or diastolic BP>or=90 mmHg and no history of hypertension. Hypertension control achieved with this screening procedure is almost double that observed in the baseline examination, and is highest among diabetic participants.

Prevalence in the eligibility for weight loss treatment in a Mediterranean population.

The aim of the present study was to analyse the prevalence and time trends of the subjects in a Mediterranean population meeting the criteria for weight loss treatment according to the National Institutes of Health (US) treatment algorithm proposed by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel. A random sample of the 25-74 year old population (n 4908) of Gerona, Spain, was examined in 1994-1995 and 1999-2000 in two independent population-based cross-sectional surveys. Cardiovascular risk factors, lifestyle measures and anthropometric variables were analysed. The prevalence of subjects meeting the criteria for weight loss treatment according to the National Institutes of Health algorithm significantly increased from 46.4 to 52.9 % in men and from 35.1 to 40.4 % in women from 1995 to 2000. Stratifying this analysis for age groups revealed a significant increase among women aged 25 to 39 years and the older age group (60 to 74 years) of both genders. This increase was mainly observed in men and women with primary school education. The high prevalence of subjects meeting the criteria for weight loss treatment and the increasing secular trend is an important issue for health policy. This trend is more pronounced in older age groups and among the population with a basic educational level.

[Analysis of trends in myocardial infarction case-fatality, incidence and mortality rates in Girona, Spain, 1990-1999]. / Análisis de la tendencia en la letalidad, incidencia y mortalidad por infarto de miocardio en Girona entre 1990 y 1999.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The incidence of myocardial infarction in Spain is low, and mortality has been decreasing over the last few decades. The objective of this study was to analyze trends in myocardial infarction mortality, incidence, attack rates, and 28-day case-fatality attack rates between 1990 and 1999 in the general population aged 35-74 years in Girona, Spain. METHODS: The study included all myocardial infarction cases in Girona classified according to the MONICA algorithm. Attack, incidence, mortality rates and case-fatality were calculated. In addition, the annual percentage change in each of these indicators during the study period was also calculated. RESULTS: The mean attack rate per 100,000 inhabitants was 258 (95% CI, 249-267) in men and 55 (95% CI, 51-59) in women. The mean mortality rate per 100,000 was 99 (95% CI, 93-104) in men and 25 (95% CI, 22-28) in women. Significant reductions in attack, incidence and recurrence rates were observed in men aged 35-64 years during the period 1990-1999, but not in men aged 65-74 years, nor in women. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial infarction incidence and mortality rates were low in the general population aged 35-64 years. Rates improved in men aged 35-64 years during the period 1990-1999, but not in those aged 65-74 years, which indicates that a combination of primary and secondary prevention has increased the age at which a myocardial infarction or its recurrence is observed. Rates in woman were lower and did not change during the study period.

Secular trends of obesity and cardiovascular risk factors in a Mediterranean population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate time trends of obesity, abdominal obesity, and cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) according to BMI and waist circumference (WC) categories in a Mediterranean population. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Subjects were Spanish men (n = 2383) and women (n = 2525) 25 to 74 years old, examined in 1994 to 1995 and 1999 to 2000 in two independent population-based cross-sectional surveys in the northeast of Spain. Lifestyle measures, CRFs, and anthropometric variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Over the 5 years of the study, mean age-standardized BMI increased by 1.0 units in men and by 0.8 units in women. At the same time the prevalence of obesity increased from 15.4% to 21.9% in men and from 15.4% to 21.4% in women. An upward trend was observed for WC and abdominal obesity (WC > 102 cm in men and WC > 88 cm in women) only in men. The proportion of men and women with hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol plasma concentration remained stable within BMI and WC categories. The proportion of hypertension and smoking in obese men significantly increased from 1995 to 2000. DISCUSSION: The 5-year increase in BMI and WC is of considerable magnitude in the present population, although several CRFs remained stable within BMI and WC categories.

Gender differences in management and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The study objectives were to assess any gender differences in the application of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and their impact on outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Prospective cohort study of patients in the PRIAMHO II registry. 58 randomly selected public hospitals in Spain included 6209 patients with AMI admitted to Coronary/Critical Care Unit from May 15 to December 15 2000 with 1-year follow-up. Data were gathered on use of coronary angiography and reperfusion procedures, on a combined outcome variable (including death, reinfarction, postinfarction angina, and stroke during hospital stay), and on 28-day and 1-year mortality rates. RESULTS: 4641 (74.75%) of the patients were male and 1568 (25.5%) female. No gender differences in coronary angiography or reperfusion therapy use were found. However, female sex alongside age, use of reperfusion therapy, diabetes mellitus, previous revascularization, previous AMI, and higher Killip class were predictors of the combined outcome variable, with an adjusted OR of 1.21 (CI 95% 1.02-1.42). CONCLUSIONS: No association was observed between the gender of patients with AMI and the application of diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Nevertheless, female sex behaved as an independent adverse short-term prognostic factor.

[Management of non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes in Spain. The DESCARTES (Descripción del Estado de los Síndromes Coronarios Agudos en un Registro Temporal ESpañol) study]. / Manejo del síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST en España. Estudio DESCARTES (Descripción del Estado de los Síndromes Coronarios Agudos en un Registro Temporal ESpañol).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There is little information regarding the management of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) in Spain from a population-based perspective. Our objective was to study the status of clinical care in patients with NSTE ACS in Spain from a representative perspective of the situation on a national level. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A prospective registry was used for consecutive patients with NSTE ACS admitted to 52 Spanish hospitals with different cardiological facilities. Centers that fulfilled the quality control criteria for the study were randomly selected for inclusion. RESULTS: Between April and May, 2002, 1877 patients were recruited. Median age was 69 years, 93% had at least one risk factor and 73% had antecedents of cardiovascular disease. The electrocardiogram on admission was abnormal in 76% of the cases, and troponin levels were elevated in 53%. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were admitted to a cardiac care unit or intensive care unit. The rates of use of diagnostic techniques were: echocardiography 56%; non-invasive test for detection of ischemia 39%; coronary angiography 41%. During hospitalization, 24% underwent coronary revascularization, 88% received aspirin, 81% heparin, 37% clopidogrel, 12% glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, 63% ss-blockers, 46% angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and 52% statins. The final diagnosis was angina in 54%, myocardial infarction in 28%, and other in 18%. Mortality was 3.7% at 28 days and 7.8% at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: DESCARTES is the first representative registry of NSTE ACS management in Spain. It shows that despite their high-risk profile, these patients receive suboptimal medical care according to current clinical recommendations.

[Analysis with the propensity score of the association between likelihood of treatment and event of interest in observational studies. An example with myocardial reperfusion]. / Análisis de la asociación entre un tratamiento y un acontecimiento de interés en estudios observacionales utilizando la probabilidad de recibir el tratamiento (Propensity Score). Un ejemplo con la reperfusión miocárdica.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Analysis of the effect of treatment in observational studies is complex due to differences between treated and nontreated patients. Calculating the probability of receiving treatment conditioned on relevant covariates (propensity score [PS]) has been proposed as a method to control for these differences. We report an application of PS to assess the association between reperfusion treatment and 28-day case fatality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHOD: We describe the procedure used to calculate PS for receiving reperfusion treatment, and different strategies to analyze the association between PS and case fatality with regression modeling and matching. Data were from a population-based registry of 6307 patients with AMI in Spain during 1997-98. RESULTS: The PS for reperfusion was calculated in 5622 patients. In the multivariate analysis, reperfusion was associated with lower case fatality (OR = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.46-0.77). When PS was included as a covariate, this association became non- significant (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.57-1.01). In the subgroup of matched patients with a similar PS (n = 3138), treatment was not associated with case fatality (OR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.72-1.26). When the influence of cases with missing data on PS was controlled for, reperfusion treatment was associated with lower fatality (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55-0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Calculating propensity score is a method that controls for differences between treated and nontreated patients. This score has limitations when matching is incomplete and when data are missing. Results of the present example suggest that reperfusion treatment reduces AMI case fatality.