RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the association of patient race and ethnicity with postanesthesia care unit (PACU) outcomes in common, noncardiac surgeries requiring general anesthesia. DESIGN: Single tertiary care academic medical center retrospective matched cohort. METHODS: We matched 1:1 1836 adult patients by race and/or ethnicity undergoing common surgeries. We compared racial and ethnic minority populations (62 American Indian, 250 Asian, 315 Black or African American, 281 Hispanic, and 10 Pacific Islander patients) to 918 non-Hispanic White patients. The primary outcomes were: the use of an appropriate number of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylactics; the incidence of PONV; and the use of a propofol infusion as part of the anesthetic (PROP). Secondary outcomes were: the use of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia, including the use of regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control; the use of any local anesthetic, including the use of liposomal bupivacaine; the duration until readiness for discharge from the PACU; the time between arrival to PACU and first pain score; and the time between the first PACU pain score of ≥4 and administration of an analgesic. Logistic and linear regression were used for relevant outcomes of interest. FINDINGS: Overall, there were no differences in the appropriate number of PONV prophylactics, nor the incidence of PONV between the two groups. There was, however, a decreased use of PROP (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.94; P = .005), PACU length of stay was 9.56 minutes longer (95% CI: 2.62, 16.49; P = .007), and time between arrival to PACU and first pain score was 2.30 minutes longer in patients from racial and ethnic minority populations (95% CI: 0.99, 3.61; P = .001). There were no statistically significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of appropriate number of PONV prophylactic medications as well as the incidence of PONV were similar in patients from racial and ethnic minority populations compared to non-Hispanic White patients. However, there was a lower use of PROP in racial and ethnic minority patients. It is important to have a health equity lens to identify differences in management that may contribute to disparities within each phase of perioperative care.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) may be associated with excessive hemodynamic variability. Whether hemodynamic variability occurs in patients with undiagnosed PPGL undergoing unrelated, non-neuroendocrine, operations is unknown. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent non-neuroendocrine surgical procedures up to 5 y before pathologic diagnosis of PPGL. For each PPGL, two non-PPGL patients were matched based on sex, age, type, and year of operation. Electronic medical records were reviewed for intraoperative blood pressures, heart rates, and hemodynamic variability was assessed with range (maximum-minimum), standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and average real variability. RESULTS: Thirty-seven PPGL patients underwent operations preceding the diagnosis of PPGL: 25 pheochromocytomas, 11 paragangliomas, and one metastatic pheochromocytoma. Median interquartile range tumor size at diagnosis was 35 mm (23 to 60). The time from index operation to PPGL diagnosis was ≤12 mo in 21 (56.8%) patients. In 23 (62.2%) patients, the subsequently diagnosed PPGL was functional. Fifteen (40.5%) PPGL and 20 (27.0%) control patients were preoperatively treated for hypertension (P = 0.149). Maximum intraoperative systolic BP was >180 mmHg for 4 (10.8%) PPGL patients and 3 (4.1%) controls (P = 0.219). Two PPGL patients had intraoperative systolic BP >230 mmHg. No significant differences were found with all other measures of intraoperative hemodynamic variability. Similarly, in secondary analysis there was no significant difference in intraoperative hemodynamic variability between biochemically active PPGL and their respective controls. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with undiagnosed PPGL undergoing a wide variety of non-neuroendocrine operations had intraoperative hemodynamic variability comparable to non-PPGL patients undergoing the same type of procedures.
