Automated mononuclear cell collection: a feasibility study employing a new software for extracorporeal photopheresis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Very recently, Fresenius Kabi, improved the software (autoMNC lymphocytes, SW 04.03.08) for mononuclear cells (MNCs) collection with the aim to ameliorate the quality of harvest, employing the automated autoMNC lymphocytes software SW 04.03.09. Herein, we report the results of an observational study evaluating the feasibility of MNCs collection in patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) at our centre, using the new COM.TEC software 04.03.08c for MNC collection, afterwards integrated in the software 04.03.09, available on the market since November 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty adult patients (21 males and 9 females) with GvHD, Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction or renal rejection, were consecutively enrolled to undergo 1 ECP procedure by the offline technique, according to our internal protocol, processing 1·5 blood volumes. Feasibility of collection was defined as: Hct in collection bag ≤5%, MNCs purity (percentage of MNCs/bag) ≥80%, MNCs collection efficiency (CE2) ≥60%, patient's platelet depletion ≤50%. RESULTS: Thirty ECP procedures were evaluated. Feasibility (defined by the four parameters previously described) of MNCs collection was observed in 1 out of the 30 harvests analysed. Median Hct in the product was 3·45% (IQR: 2·6-5·0), and median MNCs purity was 97·2% (IQR 89·1-98·6). Median CE2 for MNCs was 21·4% (IQR: 11·9-41·2), and median patient's platelet depletion was 36·2% (IQR 21·9-51·4). CONCLUSION: The autoMNC lymphocytes software SW 04.03.08c for MNCs collection in ECP setting demonstrated to collect a good quality product in terms of purity and RBC contamination even if the collection efficiency and platelet contamination must be improved.

Creation of a new hospital service for iron therapy.

Iron deficiency anemia is one of the widespread forms of anemia worldwide with important consequences on public health in general and in the management of the hospital blood supply in particular. In this context we decided to "de novo"organize a new hospital service specifically dedicated to iron therapy to correctly diagnose iron deficiency anemia and support patients with the latest generation of i.v. iron formulation. We describe the organizational and educational solutions we adopted to start the new service. The initial results in terms of safety, increase in Hb value, and RBC units saved were encouraging and it has led us to expand the categories of patients to be supported.

Comparison of two automated mononuclear cell collection systems in patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis: a prospective crossover equivalence study.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an effective cell therapy employed in several diseases, including graft versus host disease (GVHD) and organ rejection. When ECP is performed using an off-line technique, mononuclear cell (MNC) collection by leukapheresis is necessary for further manipulation (addition of 8-methoxypsoralen and ultraviolet A irradiation before reinfusion to the patient). We report the results of the first crossover equivalence study on yield and purity of MNCs collected from patients undergoing ECP with two different automated systems: MNC and CMNC (working with intermittent and continuous-flow collection, respectively), released by Terumo BCT. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients (15 males and 36 females) with GVHD or chronic lung allograft dysfunction were consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned to MNC collection alternatively by the CMNC or MNC system within each ECP cycle (two procedures) in two consecutive cycles. ECP procedures were performed using the off-line technique, according to our internal protocol, processing 1.5 blood volumes. RESULTS: A total of 204 ECP procedures were evaluated. The MNC system showed a higher MNC concentration capacity than the CMNC (mean difference, -13.46; 95% confidence interval, -21.05 to -5.47; p < 0.001). Collection efficiency was higher with the CMNC system as well as total MNC bag content, while MNC bag purity was equivalent for both systems. Platelet loss was higher with the CMNC. Equivalence was shown for MNC purity and anticoagulant infused to the patient. CONCLUSION: CMNC and MNC systems offer different advantages in different clinical conditions, and both are safe and efficient in collecting MNCs for ECP.