RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Variability in the management of glomerulonephritis may negatively impact efficacy and safety. However, there are little/no data on actual variability in the treatment of minimal change disease (MCD)/focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in adults. We assessed Spanish practice patterns for the management of adult nephrotic syndrome due to MCD or FSGS. The absence of reasonably good evidence on treatment for a disease often increases the variability substantially. Identification of evidence-practice gaps is the first necessary step in the knowledge-to-action cyclical process. We aim to analyse the real clinical practice in adults in hospitals in Spain and compare this with the recently released Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. METHODS: Participating centres were required to include all adult patients (age >18 years) with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of MCD or FSGS from 2007 to 2011. Exclusion criteria included the diagnosis of secondary nephropathy. RESULTS: We studied 119 Caucasian patients with biopsy-proven MCD (n = 71) or FSGS (n = 48) from 13 Spanish hospitals. Of these patients, 102 received immunosuppressive treatment and 17 conservative treatment. The initial treatment was steroids, except in one patient in which mycophenolate mofetil was used. In all patients, the steroids were given as a single daily dose. The mean duration of steroid treatment at initial high doses was 8.7 ± 13.2 weeks and the mean global duration was 38 ± 32 weeks. The duration of initial high-dose steroids was <4 weeks in 41% of patients and >16 weeks in 10.5% of patients. We did find a weak and negative correlation between the duration of whole steroid treatment in the first episode and the number of the later relapses (r = -0.24, P = 0.023). There were 98 relapses and they were more frequent in MCD than in FSGs patients (2.10 ± 1.6 versus 1.56 ± 1.2; P = 0.09). The chosen treatment was mainly steroids (95%). Only seven relapses were treated with another drug as a first-line treatment: two relapses were treated with mycophenolate and five relapses were treated with anticalcineurinics. A second-line treatment was needed in 29 patients (24.4%), and the most frequent drugs were the calcineurin inhibitors (55%), followed by mycophenolate mofetil (31%). Although cyclophosphamide is the recommended treatment, it was used in only 14% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: We found variation from the guidelines in the duration of initial and tapered steroid therapy, in the medical criteria for classifying a steroid-resistant condition and in the chosen treatment for the second-line treatment. All nephrologists started with a daily dose of steroids as the first-line treatment. The most frequently used steroid-sparing drug was calcineurin inhibitors. Cyclophosphamide use was much lower than expected.
RESUMO
Antecedentes y objetivos: La colonoscopia con polipectomía con fines de cribado reduce la incidencia del cáncer colorrectal y la mortalidad por esta enfermedad. Una preparación colónica aceptable es una de las claves para conseguir mejores resultados con esta técnica. Las soluciones de fosfato de sodio oral (OSP) fueron muy utilizadas en la década de los noventa del siglo pasado. Su eficacia era similar a la de las soluciones de polietilenglicol (PEG), pero más baratas y con una administración sencilla. Se han descrito series de casos de pacientes con insuficiencia renal aguda provocada por OSP. Sin embargo, en cohortes amplias de pacientes no se observó ninguna diferencia en la incidencia de daño renal entre estas dos soluciones. Métodos: Entre 2006 y 2009 identificamos 12 casos de nefropatía por fosfato tras preparación con OSP para colonoscopia. Se realizó el seguimiento de todos los pacientes durante 6 meses. Todos los pacientes habían recibido una única dosis. Resultados: Analizamos 12 casos de nefropatía por fosfato; 3 se manifestaron con IRA y 9 presentaron daño renal crónico. Cuatro de los casos se confirmaron mediante biopsia renal. Un paciente con IRA precisó hemodiálisis en el momento del diagnóstico, sin que experimentara recuperación posterior. Dos pacientes (ambos con daño crónico) recuperaron totalmente su función renal anterior. Los demás pacientes (9) presentaron una pérdida media en la filtración glomerular estimada de 24ml/min/1,73m2. Conclusiones: El uso de OSP puede ocasionar daño renal tanto agudo como crónico. Sin embargo, el daño crónico fue el más frecuente. Ambas formas de presentación suponen una pérdida considerable e irreversible de función renal. Nuevos estudios que analicen el daño renal secundario a preparación colónica deben considerar estos dos patrones distintos de daño (AU)
Background and objectives: Screening colonoscopy with polipectomy reduces colonorectal cancer incidence and mortality. An adequate bowel cleansing is one of the keys to achieving best results with this technique. Oral sodium phosphate solution (OSP) had a widespread use in the 90s decade. Its efficacy was similar to polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution, but with less cost and convenient administration. Series of patients with acute renal failure due to OSP use have been reported. However, large cohorts of patients found no difference in the incidence of renal damage between these two solutions. Methods: From 2006 to 2009 we identified twelve cases of phosphate nephropathy after colonoscopy prepared with OSP. All patients were followed up to six months. All patients had received just a single dose. Results: We analyzed 12 cases with phosphate nephropathy; three patients debuted with AKI and nine patients had chronic renal injury. Four cases were confirmed with renal biopsy. One patient with AKI needed hemodialysis at diagnosis without subsequent recovery. Two patients (both with chronic damage) fully recovered their previous renal function. The remaining patients (nine) had an average loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate of 24ml/min/1.73m2. Conclusions: The use of OSP can lead to both acute and chronic renal damage. However, chronic injury was the most common pattern. Both forms of presentation imply a significant and irreversible loss of renal function. Further studies analyzing renal damage secondary to bowel cleaning should consider these two different patterns of injury (AU)
