Diagnostic Capability of Intra-Articular Injections for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To review and critically appraise available literature concerning the diagnostic capability of intra-articular injections for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: N/A. PARTICIPANTS: N/A. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Studies assessing pain relief following intra-articular injections for the diagnosis of FAI syndrome, compared with arthroscopy as diagnostic reference standard, were considered eligible. Searches were performed across 8 databases, and the risk of bias was evaluated through the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: From 489 articles identified, 4 were included for analysis. Intra-articular injections were composed of anesthetic agents (such as lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine), combined or not with corticosteroids (triamcinolone and betamethasone). All studies were judged as "at risk of bias", and a substantial heterogeneity was found considering assessment methods and pain relief thresholds for a positive response to intra-articular injections. Overall, 2 studies reported that intra-articular injections presented a high accuracy in determining the presence of FAI syndrome. However, the remaining 2 studies indicated that intra-articular injections might present restricted diagnostic capability to discriminate FAI syndrome from healthy individuals or those with other hip pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on limited evidence, the diagnostic capability of intra-articular injections for FAI syndrome cannot be supported. It remains unclear which pain relief thresholds are related to a higher diagnostic capability. The combination of anesthetics with corticosteroids should also be further explored, including multiple pain assessments for evaluation of prolonged effects.

Correlation between psychological status, revised Müller AO classification and patient-reported outcomes: a prospective cohort analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of psychological status on clinical outcomes is valued in several medical conditions, but rare attention is given to it in orthopedic trauma. We aimed to assess the correlation between psychological status, fracture severity and patient-reported outcomes in fractured patients needing urgency surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively followed 139 consecutive patients undergoing urgency surgical treatment of a lower/upper limb fracture. Before surgery, all patients were divided into grades of fracture severity according to the Revised AO Müller Classification (AO grades). On the 15th and the 120th days after surgery, all patients underwent a psychological status assessment through the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS), in addition to a pain evaluation through VAS. One year after surgery, patient-reported outcomes were obtained by using specific scales depending on the site of fracture. RESULTS: AO grades and VAS scores were significantly correlated to scores at HADS-A (anxiety component) and HADS-D (depression component), both on the 15th and the 120th. Patients presenting persistent HADS-A and HADS-D scores equal or greater than 8 points had a risk of more than 2.5 or 2.0 times of experiencing unsatisfactory surgical outcomes, respectively [HADS-A: RR = 2.8 (95% CI: 2.2-3.5)] [HADS-D: RR = 2.2 (95% CI: 1.7-3.1)]. AO grade C and the persistency of significant symptoms of anxiety or depression were independent predictors of unsatisfactory patient-reported outcomes (OR: 1.7, p = 0.03 // OR: 2.9, p < 0.01). Female gender, age, and BMI did not present any statistically significant utility in predicting unsatisfactory patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: In fractured patients needing urgency surgical treatment, the risk of presenting unsatisfactory outcomes is more than twice as high in patients that present significant persistent changes in psychological status. Changes in psychological status are more frequent in patients presenting more severe pain and more severe fractures. AO grades and HADS scores are independent predictors of unsatisfactory outcomes in these patients.

Are visual assessments of the single-leg squat valid to be used in clinical practice? A systematic review of measurement properties based on the COSMIN guideline.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the discriminative and convergent validity of visual scales for the assessment of movement quality in the single-leg squat. METHODS: Searches performed in CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases. Studies evaluating discriminative and convergent validity of movement quality visual assessments in single-leg squats were included. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist was used to assess the risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was assessed by the GRADE modified version. RESULTS: Ten studies evaluating three different methods of visual assessment of the single-leg squat (Crossley scale; Whatman score and Medial knee displacement) were included. Very low certainty evidence suggests that the Crossley scale had sufficient discriminative validity for patient-centred outcomes. Very low to moderate certainty evidence suggests that the three visual methods of assessment of the single-leg squat had insufficient discriminative validity for surrogate outcomes and groups. None of the three methods had the convergent validity assessed. CONCLUSION: The Crossley scale exhibited sufficient discriminative validity for patient-centred outcomes, although the evidence supporting this conclusion is of very low certainty. Visual scales for the assessment of the single-leg squat movement quality should be used with caution in clinical practice as most methods had insufficient discriminative validity and no reports of convergent validity.

Does response to preoperative intra-articular anesthetic injections predict outcomes of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome?

INTRODUCTION: Some patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) who undergo surgery do not show satisfactory outcomes. Reliable tests that can inform prognosis of FAIS surgery are needed for optimized indications and contraindications to surgery. We aimed to review and critically appraise available literature on the capability of patient response to preoperative intra-articular anesthetic injections (PIAI) to predict post-surgical outcomes in patients with FAIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Studies that assessed the patient pain response to PIAI and post-surgical outcomes in patients with FAIS were considered eligible. Study selection and data collection were performed by three independent reviewers. Main outcomes evaluated were those measured by hip outcome scales often used in assessing postoperative pain and functional recovery, such as the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT). The likelihood ratio of achieving satisfactory postoperative outcomes at the mHHS (LHR) was extracted or calculated-for patients with significant response to PIAI and for those without a significant response to PIAI. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. RESULTS: Six studies were considered eligible for analysis. Five studies indicated that patient response to PIAI are associated to surgical outcomes for patients with FAIS, with a greater reduction in pain typically indicating a better surgical outcome. Additionally, the LHR ranged from 1.15 to 1.92 for patients with significant response to PIAI (I2 = 90.6%). For patients without a significant response, the LHR ranged from 0.18 to 0.65 (I2 = 87.5). An overall high risk of bias was observed for all studies included in the analysis. Study attrition, the prognostic factor measurement and the presence of confounding factors were the main sources of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Greater reductions in pain with preoperative intra-articular anesthetic injections were found to be associated to better outcomes after FAIS surgery, but all available studies contain a high risk of bias.

Tensor fascia latae and gluteal muscles myoelectric responses to increasing levels of hip medial rotation torque.

Medial hip rotation is typically attributed to the tensor fascia latae (TFL) and lateral rotation, to the gluteus maximus. However, experimental studies in cadavers suggest that the TFL lacks a moment arm for medial rotation and that the gluteus maximus may act as hip medial rotator depending on the hip flexion angle. In order to address this contradictory thinking, we measured the myoelectric activity of TFL, gluteus medius and gluteus maximus (superior portion, GMaxS, and inferior portion, GMaxI) for increasing levels of medial rotation torque applied to the hip. To keep frontal and sagittal plane hip joint net torques constant during the experiments, the medial hip rotation torque was changed by displacing standard weights along an aluminum bar device, thereby producing pure medial hip rotation torques. The effect of increasing medial hip rotation torque was investigated for a fully extended hip (0°), and at 45° and 90° of flexion. We found an increase in the myoelectric activity of the TFL (∼90%↑, p = 0.002) at 90° of flexion and of the GMaxS (∼7%↑, p = 0.048) at the extended position with an increase in medial hip torque application (from 0 to 7.4 N.m.). For the GMed (regardless of hip position) and for the 45° position (regardless of muscle), no systematic changes across torque conditions were observed. In contrast to the common clinical assumption and current practice thinking, our results indicate that an increase in TFL activity is required to control for an increase in external torque towards hip medial rotation.