Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 47(1): 177-82, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25252843

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Hyperleptinemia and metabolic acidosis (MA) are frequently observed in patients on hemodialysis (HD). While the role of leptin in patients on HD is not completely understood, HD only partially corrects MA. Both leptin and acidosis have effect on bone disease. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the effects of MA correction on chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder laboratory parameters and leptin levels. METHODS: Forty-eight patients on HD, aged 43±19 years, were prospectively studied. Individual adjustments in the bicarbonate dialysate concentration were made to maintain pre-dialysis concentration≥22 mEq/l. Blood gas analysis was done monthly for 4 months (M1-M4). RESULTS: From M0 to M4, serum albumin increased (from 3.5 ±0.3 to 4.0±0.3 g/l, p<0.0001) while ß2 microglobulin decreased (from 27.6±8.3 to 25.8±6.8 µg/ml, p=0.025). Serum leptin decreased in all but three patients, as well as leptin/adiponectin ratio (p<0.0001). There was a decrease in ionized serum calcium (from 5.0±0.5 to 4.7±0.5 mg/dl, p =0.002) and an increase in parathyroid hormone (PTH) [from 191 (85, 459) to 446 pg/ml (212, 983), p<0.0001] and in serum phosphate (from 5.4±1.4 to 5.8±1.1 mg/dl, p=0.048). CONCLUSION: MA correction in HD patients can decrease leptin, an atherogenic marker. The impact of such treatment extends to uremic bone disease, as decrease in serum calcium and increase in PTH. However, this could be an undesirable effect because it may aggravate a secondary hyperparathyroidism. Whether the reduction in leptin levels has impact on outcomes in patients on hemodialysis deserves further investigation.


Assuntos
Acidose/terapia , Bicarbonatos/sangue , Soluções para Diálise/química , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Leptina/sangue , Diálise Renal , Acidose/sangue , Adiponectina/sangue , Adulto , Bicarbonatos/administração & dosagem , Gasometria , Cálcio/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Falência Renal Crônica/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hormônio Paratireóideo/sangue , Fosfatos/sangue , Estudos Prospectivos , Albumina Sérica/metabolismo , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto Jovem , Microglobulina beta-2/sangue
2.
J Vasc Access ; 11(2): 138-42, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20175069

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The tunneled cuffed catheter (TCC) is used as a bridge access for hemodialysis. Few prospective studies have been designed to evaluate conversion from non-tunneled to TCC without the use of fluoroscopy when performed by nephrologists. METHODS: We performed an observational prospective cohort in incident patients receiving hemodialysis through a non-tunneled right jugular vein catheter. RESULTS: 130 procedures were performed in 122 patients (51+/-18 years). The success rate was 100%. There was a total of 26,546 catheter days. Ninety-one of the 130 catheters were removed during the study period. Life table analysis revealed primary patency rates of 92%, 82%, and 68% at 30, 60, and 120 days, respectively. Infection requiring catheter removal occurred at a frequency of 0.09 per 100 catheter days. Catheter malfunction requiring intervention occurred at a rate of 0.03 per 100 catheter days. Hypertension and duration of existing non-tunneled catheter of less than 2 weeks were independently associated with better TCC survival. CONCLUSION: The conversion from non-tunneled to TCC performed by nephrologists and without fluoroscopy may be safe by using the internal right jugular vein. The ideal time to do this procedure is within less than 2 weeks of existing non-tunneled catheter.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateteres de Demora , Veias Jugulares , Diálise Renal , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo , Falha de Equipamento , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Veias Jugulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Tábuas de Vida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia Intervencionista , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 21(8): 2232-8, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16632557

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In conventional haemodialysis (CHD), the morbidity and mortality rate is unacceptably high; consequently, variations in the length and frequency of the haemodialysis sessions have been studied to reduce the complications of dialysis treatment. In this sense, high-efficiency short daily haemodialysis (SDHD) has been proposed as an alternative for patients on renal replacement therapy. In this study, we have related our experience with this dialysis modality. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (16 males, mean age 35.6 +/- 14.7 years) were treated by SDHD for 33.6 +/- 18.5 months (range 6-57 months). The mean time on CHD before the switch to SDHD was 25.5 +/- 31.9 months (range 1-159 months). In 23 (88.5%) patients, native arteriovenous fistulae were used for vascular access. SDHD was performed six times a week, 1.5-2 h per session, and high flux polysulfone dialysers (surface area: 1.8 m(2)) were employed. The blood flow and dialysate flow rate were 350 and 800 ml/min, respectively. RESULTS: In this trial, the patient survival was 100%. The vascular access survival after 12, 24, 36 and 48 months on SDHD was 100, 89, 89 and 80%, respectively. There were three failures of vascular access in 72.7 patient-years (0.04 failures/patient-year). In 15 patients on SDHD during 36 consecutive months, the vascular access survival after 12, 24, 36 and 48 months was 100, 93, 93 and 84%, respectively. Also, in this group of patients, there were 0.27 hospitalizations/patient-year and 1.24 days of hospitalizations/patient-year. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that in a long-time study of patients on SDHD the morbidity and mortality rate is very low. Furthermore, we observed that failures of vascular access are not a significant problem. Consequently, we believe that SDHD is a powerful renal replacement therapy for treatment of patients on maintenance haemodialysis.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Cateteres de Demora , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glomerulonefrite/complicações , Glomerulonefrite/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/psicologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...