Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Fam Med ; 56(1): 24-29, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37870796

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2020, the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors (AFMRD) Diversity and Health Equity (DHE) Task Force developed and piloted a framework to measure diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in medical residencies across five domains: curriculum, evaluation, institution, resident pathway, and faculty pathway. The objectives were (1) to measure DEI initiatives across multiple domains in family medicine residencies using the DEI milestones and (2) to obtain current national baseline data providing criteria against which to measure effectiveness of initiatives and create tailored benchmarks. METHODS: We developed a cross-sectional survey of 12 quantitative residency characteristic items and the five DEI milestone ratings, and distributed the survey to program directors of family medicine residencies accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in the spring of 2022. We generated descriptive statistics, including item frequencies and cross-tabulations, and completed subgroup comparisons with analysis of variance. RESULTS: We collected aggregate milestone data for 194 family medicine residencies of 588 eligible programs (33% response rate). Respondents represented 48 states and US territories: 107 community-based, university-affiliated; 48 community-based; 34 university-based; and 5 military/other programs. Overall, the curriculum milestone was rated the highest (mean=2.54, SD=1.03), whereas the faculty pathway (mean=1.94, SD=1.04) and resident pathway (mean=2.02, SD=1.06) milestones were rated lowest. CONCLUSIONS: DEI milestone data may support residency programs as they assess their institution's developmental progress across five key domains. Additionally, aggregate data may shed light on collective strengths and areas for improvement.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Estudos Transversais , Diversidade, Equidade, Inclusão , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Docentes de Medicina , Acreditação
2.
J Grad Med Educ ; 14(2): 166-170, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35463173

RESUMO

Background: As the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) began to ask programs to report their efforts surrounding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), program directors felt ill prepared to evaluate their programs and measure change. Objective: To develop a tool that would allow graduate medical education (GME) programs to evaluate the current state of DEI within their residencies, identify areas of need, and track progress; to evaluate feasibility of using this assessment method within family medicine training programs; and to analyze and report pilot data from implementation of these milestones within family medicine residency programs. Methods: The Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors (AFMRD) Diversity and Health Equity (DHE) Task Force developed a tool for program DEI evaluation modeled after the ACGME Milestones. These milestones focus on DEI assessment in 5 key domains: Institution, Curriculum, Evaluation, Resident Personnel, and Faculty Personnel. After finalizing a draft, a pilot implementation of the milestones was conducted by a convenience sample of 10 AFMRD DHE Task Force members for their own programs. Results: Scores varied widely across surveyed programs for all milestones. Highest average scores were seen for the Curriculum milestone (2.65) and the lowest for the Faculty Personnel milestone (2.0). Milestone assessments were completed within 10 to 40 minutes using various methods. Conclusions: The AFMRD DEI Milestones were developed for program assessment, goal setting, and tracking of progress related to DEI within residency programs. The pilot implementation showed these milestones were easily used by family medicine faculty members in diverse settings.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Acreditação , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Docentes de Medicina , Humanos
3.
Prim Care ; 39(1): 71-82, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22309582

RESUMO

Vaginal bleeding, abdominopelvic pain, nausea, and vomiting are common presenting symptoms in early pregnancy. All women of reproductive age who present with abdominal or pelvic pain or with vaginal bleeding should be evaluated for possible pregnancy. There should be a high index of suspicion for ectopic pregnancy in women presenting with abdominal pain and bleeding after approximately 7 weeks of amenorrhea. Investigation for the cause of the bleeding should ensue. Gestational trophoblastic disease should be considered as a possible cause. Treatment options for nausea during pregnancy should be discussed with women with this common symptom.


Assuntos
Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Aborto Espontâneo , Aborto Terapêutico , Feminino , Doença Trofoblástica Gestacional , Humanos , Mola Hidatiforme , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Gravidez Ectópica , Fatores de Risco
4.
WMJ ; 109(5): 285, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21066935
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...