Cardiac Function and Functional Capacity in Patients with Long COVID: a Comparison to Propensity-Matched Community Controls.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac impairment has been associated with acute COVID-19 since the earliest reports of the pandemic. However, its role in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC, or "long COVID") is undefined, and many existing observations about cardiovascular involvement in PASC are uncontrolled. OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of cardiac dysfunction in patients with Long COVID, and non-infected controls from the same community, and explore their association with functional capacity. METHODS: Echocardiography was used to assess cardiac structure and function, including the measurement of global longitudinal strain (GLS), in 190 participants with Long COVID. All underwent assessment of functional impairment by subjective (Duke Activity Status Index, DASI) and objective tests (6-minute walk test, 6MWT). The 190 participants from the Long COVID group were matched with those from 979 patients who underwent the same tests in the pre-COVID-19 era, using a propensity score. RESULTS: The 190 patients with Long COVID had similar age and risk factor profiles to those of their matched controls. LV dimensions and geometry, but not diastolic parameters, were significantly altered in the Long COVID group. The Long COVID group had subclinical systolic dysfunction (GLS 18.5±2.6 vs 19.3±2.7%, p=0.005), and more Long COVID patients had abnormal (<16%) GLS (13% vs 8%, p=0.035). The association of Long COVID with abnormal GLS (OR 1.49 [1.04, 2.45]) was independent of - and had a similar or greater effect size - than age and risk factors. There was no interaction of Long COVID with the association of risk factors with GLS. As expected, the Long COVID group had significant subjective (<85% predicted METS; 72% vs 5%, p<0.001) and objective functional impairment (29% vs 24%, p=0.026), but GLS was only weakly associated with both subjective (r=0.30, p=0.005) and objective (r=0.21, p=0.05) functional impairment. The presence of Long COVID was independently associated with subjective (OR=159.7 [95% CI: 61.6-414.2]), and objective functional impairment (OR=2.8 [95% CI: 1.5-5.2]). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired GLS and LV dimensions are the echocardiographic features that are over-represented in Long COVID, and this association is similar to, and independent of other risk factors. Impaired GLS is weakly associated with functional impairment.

Strain surveillance during chemotherapy to improve cardiovascular outcomes: the SUCCOUR-MRI trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The detection of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) by reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during chemotherapy usually triggers the initiation of cardioprotective therapy. This study addressed whether the same approach should be applied to patients with worsening of global longitudinal strain (GLS) without attaining thresholds of LVEF. METHODS: Strain sUrveillance during Chemotherapy for improving Cardiovascular Outcomes (SUCCOUR-MRI) was a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial involving 14 sites. Of 355 patients receiving anthracyclines with normal baseline LVEF, 333 patients (age 59±13 years, 79% women) with at least one other CTRCD risk factor, able to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), GLS and 3D echocardiography were tracked over 12 months. A total of 105 patients (age 59±13 years, 75% women, 69% breast cancer) developing GLS-CTRCD (>12% relative reduction of GLS without a change in LVEF) between cardioprotection with neurohormonal antagonists versus usual care were randomized. The primary endpoint was 12-month change in MRI-LVEF; the secondary endpoint was MRI LVEF-defined CTRCD. RESULTS: During follow-up, 2 patients died and 2 developed heart failure. Most patients were randomized at 3 months (62%). Median doses of angiotensin inhibition/blockade and beta-blockade were 75% and 50% of respective targets; 21 (43%) had side-effects attributed to cardioprotection. Due to a smaller LVEF change from baseline with cardioprotection than usual care (-2.5±5.4% vs -5.6±5.9%, p=0.009), follow-up LVEF was higher after cardioprotection (59±5% vs 55±6%, p<0.0001). After adjustment for baseline LVEF, the mean (95% confidence interval) difference in the change in LVEF between the two groups was -3.6% (-1.8% to -5.5%, p<0.001). After cardioprotection, 1/49 patients developed 12-month LVEF-CTRCD, compared to 6/56 in usual care (p=0.075). GLS improved at 3 months post-randomization in the cardioprotection group, with little change with usual care. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with isolated GLS reduction after anthracyclines, cardioprotection is associated with better preservation of 12-month MRI-LVEF compared with usual care.

Prognostication and Interventional Guidance Using Acceleration-Ejection Time Ratio in Undifferentiated Paradoxical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Studies in paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (PLFAS) have demonstrated conflicting outcomes with variable survival advantage from aortic valve replacement (AVR). PLFAS is a heterogeneous composition of patients with uncertainty regarding true stenosis severity that continues to confound decision-making for AVR. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of the Doppler acceleration (AT) to ejection (ET) time ratio (AT:ET) for prediction of prognosis and benefit from AVR in undifferentiated PLFAS. METHODS: Patients with echocardiographic findings of PLFAS (aortic valve area <1.0 cm2 or indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm2/m2, mean gradient <40 mm Hg, indexed stroke volume <35 mL/m2, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%) were identified and grouped according to an AT:ET cutoff of 0.35. The primary outcome was a 5-year composite of cardiac mortality or AVR. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary endpoint and all-cause mortality at 5 years. Effect of AVR was analyzed in the AT:ET <0.35 and ≥0.35 groups. RESULTS: A total of 171 PLFAS patients (median age 77.0 years, 57% women) were followed for a median of 8.9 years. AT:ET ≥0.35 was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (HR: 4.77 [95% CI: 2.94-7.75]; P < 0.001) with incremental value over standard indices of stenosis severity (net reclassification improvement: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.14-0.84]). AT:ET ≥0.35 also remained predictive of increased cardiac death (HR: 2.91 [95% CI: 1.47-5.76]; P = 0.002) and AVR (HR: 8.45 [95% CI: 4.16-17.1]; P < 0.001), respectively, following competing risk analysis. No difference in all-cause mortality was observed. AVR in the AT:ET ≥0.35 group was associated with significant reductions in 5-year cardiac (HR: 0.09 [95% CI: 0.02-0.36]; P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.16 [95% CI: 0.07-0.38]; P < 0.001). No improvement in survival from AVR was demonstrated in AT:ET <0.35 patients. CONCLUSIONS: AT:ET ≥0.35 in PLFAS predicts poorer outcomes and/or need for AVR. In undifferentiated PLFAS patients, AT:ET may have a potential role in improving patient selection for prognostic AVR.

Definition and Validation of Prognostic Phenotypes in Moderate Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Adverse outcomes from moderate aortic stenosis (AS) may be caused by progression to severe AS or by the effects of comorbidities. In the absence of randomized trial evidence favoring aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with moderate AS, phenotyping patients according to risk may assist decision making. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify and validate clusters of moderate AS that may be used to guide patient management. METHODS: Unsupervised clustering algorithms were applied to demographics, comorbidities, and echocardiographic parameters in a training data set in patients with moderate AS (n = 2,469). External validation was obtained by assigning the defined clusters to an independent group with moderate AS (n = 1,358). The primary outcome, a composite of cardiac death, heart failure hospitalization, or aortic valve (AV) intervention after 5 years, was assessed between clusters in both data sets. RESULTS: Four distinct clusters-cardiovascular (CV)-comorbid, low-flow, calcified AV, and low-risk-with significant outcomes (log-rank P < 0.0001 in both data sets) were identified and replicated. The highest risk was in the CV-comorbid cluster (validation HR: 2.00 [95% CI: 1.54-2.59]; P < 0.001). The effect of AVR on cardiac death differed among the clusters. There was a significantly lower rate of outcomes after AVR in the calcified AV cluster (validation HR: 0.21 [95% CI: 0.08-0.57]; P = 0.002), but no significant effect on outcomes in the other 3 clusters. These analyses were limited by the low rate of AVR. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate AS has several phenotypes, and multiple comorbidities are the key drivers of adverse outcomes in patients with moderate AS. Outcomes of patients with noncalcified moderate AS were not altered by AVR in these groups. Careful attention to subgroups of moderate AS may be important to define treatable risk.

Absolute cardiovascular risk assessment using 'real world' clinic blood pressures compared to standardized unobserved and ambulatory methods: an observational study.

Clinic blood pressure (BP) is recommended for absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. However, in 'real-world' settings, clinic BP measurement is unstandardised and less reliable compared to more rigorous methods but the impact for absolute CVD risk assessment is unknown. This study aimed to determine the difference in absolute CVD risk assessment using real-world clinic BP compared to standardised BP methods. Participants were patients (n = 226, 59 ± 15 years; 58% female) with hypertension referred to a BP clinic for assessment. 'Real-world' clinic BP was provided by the referring doctor. All participants had unobserved automated office BP (AOBP) and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) measured at the clinic. Absolute CVD risk was calculated (Framingham) using systolic BP from the referring doctor (clinic BP), AOBP and ABPM, with agreement assessed by Kappa statistic. Clinic systolic BP was 18 mmHg than AOBP and daytime ABPM and 22 mmHg higher than 24-h ABPM (p < 0.001). Subsequently, absolute CVD risk scores using clinic BP were higher compared to AOBP, daytime ABPM and 24-h ABPM (10.4 ± 8.1%, 7.8 ± 6.4%, 7.8 ± 6.3%, and 7.3 ± 6.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). As a result, more participants were classified as high CVD risk using clinic BP (n = 89, 40%) compared with AOBP (n = 44, 20%) daytime ABPM (n = 38, 17%) and 24-h ABPM (n = 38, 17%) (p < 0.001) with weak agreement in risk classification (κ = 0.57[0.45-0.69], κ = 0.52[0.41-0.64] and κ = 0.55[0.43-0.66], respectively). Real-world clinic BP was higher and classified twice as many participants at high CVD risk compared to AOBP or ABPM. Given the challenges to high-quality BP measurement in clinic, more rigorous BP measurement methods are needed for absolute CVD risk assessment.

Long-term risk of heart failure in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer survivors are at increased risk of heart failure (HF). While cardiotoxicity is commonly sought at the time of cancer chemotherapy, HF develops as a result of multiple 'hits' over time, and there is limited evidence regarding the frequency and causes of HF during survivorship. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review sought to investigate the relationship between cardiotoxic cancer therapies and HF during survivorship. METHODS: We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases for studies reporting HF in adult survivors (≥50 years old), who were ≥5 years postpotential cardiotoxic cancer therapy. A random effects model was used to examine the associations of HF. RESULTS: Thirteen papers were included, comprising 190 259 participants (mean age 53.5 years, 93% women). The risk of HF was increased (overall RR 1.47 (95% CI (1.17 to 1.86)). Cardiotoxic treatment, compared with cancer alone, provided a similar risk (RR of 1.46 (95% CI 0.98 to 2.16)). The overall HF incidence rate was 2.1% compared with 1.7% in the control arm-an absolute risk difference of 0.4%. In the breast cancer population ratio (11 studies), the overall HF RR was 2.57 (95% CI 1.35 to 4.90)). Although heterogeneity was significant (I2=77.2), this was explained by differences in patient characteristics; once multivariable analysis accounted for follow-up duration (OR 0.99, 95% CI (0.97 to 0.99), p=0.047), age (OR 1.14, 95% CI (1.04 to 1.25), p=0.003) and hypertension (OR 0.95, 95% CI (0.92 to 0.98), p<0.001), residual heterogeneity was low (I2=28.7). CONCLUSIONS: HF is increased in adult cancer survivors, associated with cardiotoxic cancer therapy and standard risk factors. However, the small absolute risk difference between survivors and controls suggests that universal screening of survivors is unjustifiable. A risk model based on age, cardiotoxic cancer therapy and standard risk factors may facilitate a selective screening process in this at-risk population.

Relationship between NT-proBNP, echocardiographic abnormalities and functional status in patients with subclinical siabetic cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Persons with diabetes are at risk for developing a cardiomyopathy through several pathophysiological mechanisms independent of traditional risk factors for heart failure. Among those with diabetic cardiomyopathy (DbCM), the relationship between natriuretic peptides, cardiac structural abnormalities and functional capacity is largely unknown. METHODS: In this prespecified subgroup analysis of the Aldose Reductase Inhibition for Stabilization of Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure (ARISE-HF) trial, 685 participants with asymptomatic DbCM underwent baseline echocardiography data, laboratory investigations, and functional assessments. Participants were stratified by N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) quartiles, and correlation with echocardiographic and functional parameters were assessed using Spearman correlation test. RESULTS: The median NT-proBNP was 71 (Q1, Q3: 33, 135) ng/L. No association was observed between NT-proBNP concentrations and echocardiographic parameters of either diastolic or systolic dysfunction including global longitudinal strain, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index, left atrial volume index, E/E', or right ventricular systolic pressure. In contrast, NT-proBNP was significantly correlated with overall Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score (rho = - 0.10; p = 0.007), the Physical Activity Scale in the Elderly (rho = - 0.12; p = 0.004), duration of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (rho = - 0.28; p < 0.001), peak VO2 (rho = - 0.26; p < 0.001), and ratio of minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (rho = 0.12; p = 0.002). After adjustment for known confounders, the correlation with Physical Activity Scale in the Elderly and overall Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score was no longer significant. CONCLUSION: Among patients with subclinical DbCM, elevated NT-proBNP concentrations are associated with worse health status, lower activity levels, and reduced functional capacity, but not with cardiac structural abnormalities. These findings suggest that regardless of cardiac structural abnormalities, biomarker concentrations reflect important deterioration in functional capacity in affected individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ARISE-HF, NCT04083339 Date Registered August 23, 2019.

Use of artificial intelligence-guided echocardiography to detect cardiac dysfunction and heart valve disease in rural and remote areas: Rationale and design of the AGILE-echo trial.

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is essential in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including but not limited to heart failure (HF) and heart valve disease (HVD). However, its dependence on expert acquisition means that its accessibility in rural areas may be limited, leading to delayed management decisions and potential missed diagnoses. Artificial intelligence-guided (AI)-TTE offers a solution by permitting non-expert image acquisition. The impact of AI-TTE on the timing of diagnosis and early initiation of cardioprotection is undefined. METHODS: AGILE-Echo (use of Artificial intelligence-Guided echocardiography to assIst cardiovascuLar patient managEment) is a randomized-controlled trial conducted in 5 rural and remote areas around Australia. Adults with CV risk factors and exercise intolerance, or concerns regarding HVD are randomized into AI-TTE or usual care (UC). AI-TTE participants may have a cardiovascular problem excluded, identified (leading to AI-guided interventions) or unresolved (leading to conventional TTE). UC participants undergo usual management, including referral for standard TTE. The primary endpoint is a composite of HVD or HF diagnosis at 12-months. Subgroup analysis, stratified based on age range and sex, will be conducted. All statistical analyses will be conducted using R. RESULTS: Of the first 157 participants, 78 have been randomized into AI-TTE (median age 68 [IQR 17]) and 79 to UC (median age 65 [IQR 17], P = .034). HVD was the primary concern in 37 participants (23.6%) while 84.7% (n = 133) experienced exercise intolerance. The overall 10-year HF incidence risk was 13.4% and 20.0% (P = .089) for UC and AI-TTE arm respectively. Atrial remodeling, left ventricular remodeling and valvular regurgitation were the most common findings. Thirty-three patients (42.3%) showed no abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized-controlled trial of AI-TTE will provide proof-of-concept for the role of AI-TTE in identifying pre-symptomatic HF or HVD when access to TTE is limited. Additionally, this could promote the usage of AI-TTE in rural or remote areas, ultimately improving health and quality of life of community dwelling adults with risks, signs or symptoms of cardiac dysfunction.

Racial Differences in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: The ARISE-HF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DbCM) increases risk of overt heart failure in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Racial and ethnic differences in DbCM remain unexplored. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to identify racial and ethnic differences among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, structural heart disease, and impaired exercise capacity. METHODS: The ARISE-HF (Aldolase Reductase Inhibitor for Stabilization of Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure) trial is assessing the efficacy of an aldose reductase inhibitor for exercise capacity preservation in 691 persons with DbCM. Baseline characteristics, echocardiographic parameters, and functional capacity were analyzed and stratified by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: The mean age of the study participants was 67.4 years; 50% were women. Black and Hispanic patients had lower use of diabetes mellitus treatments. Black patients had poorer baseline ventricular function and more impaired global longitudinal strain. Overall, health status was preserved, based on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, but reduced exercise capacity was present as evidenced by reduced Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) scores. When stratified by race and ethnicity and compared with the entire cohort, Black patients had poorer health status, more reduced physical activity, and a greater impairment in exercise capacity during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, whereas Hispanic patients also displayed compromised cardiopulmonary exercise testing functional capacity. White patients demonstrated higher physical activity and functional capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Racial and ethnic differences exist in baseline characteristics of persons affected by DbCM, with Black and Hispanic study participants demonstrating higher risk features. These insights inform the need to address differences in the population with DbCM. (Safety and Efficacy of AT-001 in Patients With Diabetic Cardiomyopathy [ARISE-HF]; NCT04083339).

Mechanical dyssynchrony as a selection criterion for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Design of the AMEND-CRT trial.

AIMS: One third of patients do not improve after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Septal flash (SF) and apical rocking (ApRock) are deformation patterns observed on echocardiography in most patients eligible for CRT. These markers of mechanical dyssynchrony have been associated to improved outcome after CRT in observational studies and may be useful to better select patients. The aim of this trial is to investigate whether the current guideline criteria for selecting patients for CRT should be modified and include SF and ApRock to improve therapy success rate, reduce excessive costs and prevent exposure to device-related complications in patients who would not benefit from CRT. METHODS: The AMEND-CRT trial is a multicentre, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, sham-controlled trial with a non-inferiority design. The trial will include 578 patients scheduled for CRT according to the 2021 ESC guidelines who satisfy all inclusion criteria. The randomization is performed 1:1 to an active control arm ('guideline arm') or an experimental arm ('echo arm'). All participants receive a device, but in the echo arm, CRT is activated only when SF or ApRock or both are present. The outcome of both arms will be compared after 1 year. The primary outcome measures are the average change in left ventricular end-systolic volume and patient outcome assessed using a modified Packer Clinical Composite Score. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this trial will redefine the role of echocardiography in CRT and potentially determine which patients with heart failure and a prolonged QRS duration should receive CRT, especially in patients who currently have a class IIa or class IIb recommendation.

Lipidomic Risk Score to Enhance Cardiovascular Risk Stratification for Primary Prevention.

BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification is vital for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, traditional tools such as the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) may underperform within the diverse intermediate-risk group, which includes individuals requiring distinct management strategies. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop a lipidomic-enhanced risk score (LRS), specifically targeting risk prediction and reclassification within the intermediate group, benchmarked against the FRS. METHODS: The LRS was developed via a machine learning workflow using ridge regression on the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab; n = 10,339). It was externally validated with the Busselton Health Study (n = 4,492), and its predictive utility for coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS)-based outcomes was independently validated in the BioHEART cohort (n = 994). RESULTS: LRS significantly improved discrimination metrics for the intermediate-risk group in both AusDiab and Busselton Health Study cohorts (all P < 0.001), increasing the area under the curve for CVD events by 0.114 (95% CI: 0.1123-0.1157) and 0.077 (95% CI: 0.0755-0.0785), with a net reclassification improvement of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.21-0.51) and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.15-0.49), respectively. For CACS-based outcomes in BioHEART, LRS achieved a significant area under the curve improvement of 0.02 over the FRS (0.76 vs 0.74; P < 1.0 × 10-5). A simplified, clinically applicable version of LRS was also created that had comparable performance to the original LRS. CONCLUSIONS: LRS, augmenting the FRS, presents potential to improve intermediate-risk stratification and to predict atherosclerotic markers using a simple blood test, suitable for clinical application. This could facilitate the triage of individuals for noninvasive imaging such as CACS, fostering precision medicine in CVD prevention and management.

Association of Reduced Left Atrial Reserve With Exercise Intolerance and Outcome in Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive heart disease (HHD) is a leading contributor to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the mechanisms behind the transition to the symptomatic phase remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: We sought to find the association of the exercise response of left atrial (LA) mechanical function with functional capacity, symptoms, and outcome across the heart failure (HF) spectrum in hypertension. METHODS: Echocardiography (including LA reservoir peak atrial longitudinal strain [PALS] and peak atrial contractile strain [PACS] and LA stiffness index) was performed at rest and immediately postexercise in 139 patients with HHD-35 with stage A, 48 with stage B, and 56 with stage C HFpEF. Patients were followed for HF and atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: Exercise capacity was progressively worse from stage A through stage B to stage C and was accompanied by a gradual impairment of changes in PALS and PACS from rest to exercise, whereas LA stiffness reserve remained unchanged until stage C. Peak atrial longitudinal strain and PACS reserves were independently associated with exercise capacity (P = .017 and .008, respectively). Left atrial stiffness reserve and E/e' were the strongest associations of symptomatic HF. Over a median of 25 months, 35 patients developed HF and/or atrial fibrillation. Peak atrial longitudinal strain and PACS reserves were associated with the study end points after adjusting for age, diabetes, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, LA volume index, resting E/e', and resting PALS/PACS. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired exercise reserve of LA strain and stiffness are associated with reduced functional capacity in hypertension, and LA strain reserve is independently associated with outcome. These parameters appear to be determinants of progression to overt HF in HHD; however, their contribution may differ depending on HF stage.

Comparison of Echocardiography and Multi-Planar Gated Acquisition Scans for Predicting Cancer-Treatment-Related Cardiovascular Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend using sequential cardiac imaging to monitor for cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) in patients undergoing potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Multiple different imaging cardiac modalities are available and there are few prospective head-to-head comparative studies to help guide treatment. OBJECTIVES: To perform an exploratory prospective cohort study of "real-world" CTRCD comparing multigated acquisition nuclear ventriculography (MUGA) at the referring cancer specialist's discretion with a novel echocardiographic strategy at an Australian tertiary hospital. METHOD: Patients were recruited from haematology and oncology outpatient clinics if they were scheduled for treatment with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab. Patients underwent simultaneous MUGA-based cardiac imaging (conventional strategy) at a frequency according to evidenced-based guidelines in addition to researcher-conducted echocardiographic imaging. The echocardiographic imaging was performed in all patients at time points recommended by international society guidelines. Outcomes included adherence to guideline recommendations, concordance between MUGA and echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements, and detection of cardiac dysfunction (defined as >5% LVEF decrement from baseline by three-dimensional [3D]-LVEF). A secondary end point was accuracy of global longitudinal strain in predicting cardiac dysfunction. RESULTS: In total, 35 patients were recruited, including 15 with breast cancer, 19 with haematological malignancy, and one with gastric cancer. MUGA and echocardiographic LVEF measurements correlated poorly with limits of agreement of 30% between 3D-LVEF and MUGA-LVEF and 37% for 3D-LVEF and MUGA-LVEF. Only one case (2.9%) of CTRCD was diagnosed by MUGA, compared with 12 (34.2%) cases by echocardiography. Four (4) patients had >10% decrement in 3D-LVEF that was not detected by MUGA. Global longitudinal strain at 2 months displayed significant ability to predict CTRCD (area under the curve, 0.75, 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The MUGA correlates poorly with echocardiographic assessment with substantial discrepancy between MUGA and echocardiography in CTRCD diagnosis. Echocardiographic and MUGA imaging strategies should not be considered equivalent for imaging cancer patients, and a single imaging modality should ideally be used per patient to prevent misdiagnosis by inter-modality variation These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require confirmation with larger studies.

Randomized Trial of a Selective Aldose Reductase Inhibitor in Patients With Diabetic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Progression to symptomatic heart failure is a complication of type 2 diabetes; heart failure onset in this setting is commonly preceded by deterioration in exercise capacity. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether AT-001, a highly selective aldose reductase inhibitor, can stabilize exercise capacity among individuals with diabetic cardiomyopathy (DbCM) and reduced peak oxygen uptake (Vo2). METHODS: A total of 691 individuals with DbCM meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized to receive placebo or ascending doses of AT-001 twice daily. Stratification at inclusion included region of enrollment, cardiopulmonary exercise test results, and use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. The primary endpoint was proportional change in peak Vo2 from baseline to 15 months. Subgroup analyses included measures of disease severity and stratification variables. RESULTS: The mean age was 67.5 ± 7.2 years, and 50.4% of participants were women. By 15 months, peak Vo2 fell in the placebo-treated patients by -0.31 mL/kg/min (P = 0.005 compared to baseline), whereas in those receiving high-dose AT-001, peak Vo2 fell by -0.01 mL/kg/min (P = 0.21); the difference in peak Vo2 between placebo and high-dose AT-001 was 0.30 (P = 0.19). In prespecified subgroup analyses among those not receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists at baseline, the difference between peak Vo2 in placebo vs high-dose AT-001 at 15 months was 0.62 mL/kg/min (P = 0.04; interaction P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with DbCM and impaired exercise capacity, treatment with AT-001 for 15 months did not result in significantly better exercise capacity compared with placebo. (Safety and Efficacy of AT-001 in Patients With Diabetic Cardiomyopathy [ARISE-HF]; NCT04083339).