Value of point-of-care blood testing in emergent trauma management.

BACKGROUND: No prospective study demonstrates the value of point-of-care laboratory testing (POCT) in the management of major trauma. METHODS: In a prospective, noninterventional, study of 200 major trauma patients, we evaluated the influence of a blood POCT profile (hemoglobin, Na+, K+, Cl-, blood urea nitrogen, glucose, pH, PCO2, PO2, HCO3-, base deficit, and lactate) on emergent diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Physicians responded to a standardized set of questions on their diagnostic and therapeutic plans before and after the availability of POCT results. Management plan changes were deemed emergently appropriate, if they were influenced by the POCT results and, within the ensuing 30 minutes, the change in management was likely to reduce morbidity or conserve resources. RESULTS: For emergently appropriate plan changes, Na+, Cl-, K+, and blood urea nitrogen were never influential, whereas in each of 6.0% of cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5%-10.2%) at least one of the remaining POCT parameters was influential. An emergently appropriate change was based on hemoglobin in 3.5% of cases (95% CI, 1.0%-6.1%), blood gas parameters in 3.0% of cases (95% CI, 0.64%-5.7%), lactate in 2.5% of cases (95% CI, 1.1%-5.7%), and glucose in 0.5% of cases (95% CI, 0.1%-2.8%). All of these cases involved blunt injury. CONCLUSION: Na+, Cl-, K+, and blood urea nitrogen levels do not influence the initial management of major trauma patients. In patients with severe blunt injury, hemoglobin, glucose, blood gas, and lactate measurements occasionally result in morbidity-reducing or resource-conserving management changes.

Abdominal CT scanning for trauma: how low can we go?

PURPOSE: computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen is an established, albeit expensive and perhaps overused, diagnostic modality for the evaluation of the injured patient. We developed a practice management guideline for blunt abdominal trauma intended to reduce the percentage of negative CT scans, yet minimize delayed recognition of injury and non-therapeutic laparotomy. PROCEDURES: between April 1996 and March 1997, 1147 adult patients at risk for blunt abdominal injury were admitted to our Level I trauma centre and underwent abdominal evaluation according to the practice management guideline. MAIN FINDINGS: abdominal CT was performed in 522 patients (45%), and 441 scans were negative (85%). Delayed recognition of injury and non-therapeutic laparotomy rates were low, 4% and 1.6%, respectively. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSION: abdominal CT scanning in trauma patients can achieve low non-therapeutic laparotomy and delayed recognition of injury rates but at the expense of high negative CT scan rates. Greater reliance on the physical examination and perhaps abdominal ultrasound may reduce negative CT scan rates and yet preserve low non-therapeutic laparotomy and delayed recognition of injury rates.

1998-1999 SAEM emergency medicine faculty salary and benefits survey.

OBJECTIVES: The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) commissioned an emergency medicine (EM) faculty salary and benefits survey for all 1998 residency review committee (RRC)-EM-accredited programs using the SAEM fourth-generation survey instrument. Responses were collected by SAEM and blinded from the investigators. METHODS: Blinded program and individual faculty data were entered into a customized version of FileMaker Pro, a relational database program with a built-in statistical package. Salary data were sorted by program region, faculty title, American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) certification, academic rank, years postresidency, program size, and whether data were reported to the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC). Demographic data were analyzed with regard to numerous criteria, including department staffing levels, ED volumes, ED length of stay, department income sources, salary incentive components, and specific type and value of fringe benefits offered. Data were compared with those from previous SAEM studies. RESULTS: Seventy-three of 120 (61%) accredited programs responded, yielding usable data for 70 programs and 965 full-time faculty among the four AAMC regions. Mean salaries were reported as follows: all faculty, $167,478; first-year faculty, $140,616; programs reporting data to the AAMC, $161,794; programs not reporting data to the AAMC, $165,724. Mean salaries as reported by AAMC region: northeast, $167,876; south, $160,586; midwest, $190,957; west, $148,977. CONCLUSIONS: Reported salaries for full-time EM residency faculty continue to rise. Significant regional differences in salaries have been present in all four SAEM surveys. Nonclinical hours are compensated at approximately one-half the rate paid for clinical hours. The demographic data indicate that EM residency faculty are working at the upper extremes of numbers of patient encounters per physician, patient acuity levels, and department lengths of stay.

Double-blind, randomized study of nalmefene and naloxone in emergency department patients with suspected narcotic overdose.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety, and withdrawal symptoms in emergency department patients with suspected narcotic overdose treated with nalmefene, an opioid antagonist with a 4- to 10-hour duration of action, with those treated with naloxone. METHODS: Adults in 9 centers who would otherwise receive naloxone for altered consciousness levels were randomly assigned to receive intravenous study drug (1 mg nalmefene, or 2 mg nalmefene or 2 mg naloxone, double-blinded) every 5 minutes as needed for up to 4 doses in a 4-hour study. Outcomes were 20-minute and 4-hour posttreatment changes in respiratory rates, Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale scores, Opioid Withdrawal Scale scores, and incidences of adverse events. RESULTS: Opioid positivity was recorded for 30 of 63 (1-mg nalmefene), 23 of 55 (2-mg nalmefene), and 24 of 58 (naloxone) cases, 75% of whom also had nonopioid central nervous system depressants. Most patients received only 1 dose of study drug. Similar, clinically meaningful improvements in respiratory rates and Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale scores were seen with all treatments. No statistical differences in efficacy or withdrawal outcomes were seen between treatment groups, and no significant overall time-treatment interactions occurred, in either the entire patient group or among opioid-positive cases (P >.21, all comparisons). Adverse events occurred in 30.9% (2 mg nalmefene), 15.9% (1 mg nalmefene), and 15.5% (naloxone) of patients (P >.08); none were associated with morbidity. CONCLUSION: In this study of patients with varied potential causes of altered consciousness, nalmefene (1 mg and 2 mg) and naloxone (2 mg) appeared to be efficacious, safe, and to yield similar clinical outcomes.

Rapid-sequence intubation at an emergency medicine residency: success rate and adverse events during a two-year period.

OBJECTIVES: Rapid-sequence intubation (RSI) is an active airway intervention used frequently in emergency medicine (EM). The authors hypothesized that RSI can be performed safely in the setting of an EM training program at a tertiary care center. METHODS: Observational study of RSI at an urban ED/Level 1 trauma center with annual census of 100,000 patients. Consecutive patients who underwent RSI during a two-year period were studied. Data included age, gender, type of patient (medical/trauma), indication for intubation, number of intubation attempts (laryngoscope passes), training level of operator, and major immediate adverse events (clinical deterioration within 10 minutes of RSI). RESULTS: RSI was used in 417 of 596 (70%) critically ill patients requiring emergent intubation. The patient demographic distribution was the following: adults 89.7%, male 58%, and trauma 44%. Primary indications for intubation among RSI patients were as follows: mechanical ventilation 57.4%, airway protection 41.3%, and cardiac arrest 1.3%. Distribution of intubations by level of EM training was PGY1, 5%; PGY2, 52%; PGY3, 40%; and attendings, 3%. Intubations were successfully completed within two attempts in 97% of the patients. Major immediate adverse events were encountered in six patients (1.4%) (hypotention=2, hypoxemia=1, dysrhythmia=3). There was no death attributable to RSI. The rate of intubations requiring two or fewer attempts and without major immediate adverse events was 96%. Three patients required cricothyrotomy. CONCLUSION: In the setting of an EM residency at a tertiary care ED, RSI can be performed successfully with few major immediate adverse events.

1995-1996 SAEM emergency medicine faculty salary/benefits survey.

OBJECTIVE: The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) commissioned an emergency medicine (EM) faculty salary and benefit survey for all 1995 Residency Review Committee in Emergency Medicine (RRC-EM)-accredited programs using the SAEM third-generation survey instrument. Responses were collected by SAEM and blinded from the investigators. POPULATION: Seventy-six of 112 (68%) accredited programs responded, yielding data for 1,032 full-time faculty among the four Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) regions. METHODS: Blinded program and individual faculty data were entered into a customized version of Filemaker Pro, a relational database program with a built-in statistical package. Salary data were sorted by 115 separate criteria such as program regions, faculty title, American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) certification, academic rank, years postresidency, program size, and whether data were reported to AAMC. Demographic data from 132 categories were analyzed and included number of staff and residents per shift, number of intensive care unit (ICU) beds, obstacles to hiring new staff, and specific type and value of fringe benefits offered. Data were compared with those from the 1990 and 1992 SAEM and the 1995-96 AAMC studies. RESULTS: Mean salaries were reported as follows: all faculty, $158,100; first-year faculty, $131,074; programs reporting data to AAMC, $152,198; programs not reporting data to AAMC, $169,251. Mean salaries as reported by AAMC region: northeast, $155,909; south, $155,403; midwest, $172,260; west, $139,930. Mean salaries as reported by program financial source: community, $175,599; university, $152,878; municipal, $141,566. CONCLUSIONS: Reported salaries for full-time EM residency faculty continue to rise. Salaries in programs reporting data to the AAMC are considerably lower than those not reporting. The gap between ABEM-certified and non-ABEM-certified faculty continues to widen. Residency-trained faculty are now shown to earn more than non-residency-trained faculty. Significant regional differences in salaries have been present in all three SAEM surveys.

Collaboration in emergency medicine research: a consensus statement.

The role of collaboration in medical research and how it applies to emergency medicine (EM) research are discussed. The guidance of the Division of Health Sciences Policy of the Institute of Medicine is reviewed. Application of the principles of collaborative efforts and recognition of each individual's contribution are overviewed. Emergency physicians can and should be invaluable contributors to collaborative research. Collaborative research relationships, whether established at individual institutions or through national clinical trials, must be developed deliberately. The specialty of EM must make the necessary commitment of time and resources to ensure that these occur.

Collaboration in emergency medicine research: a consensus statement.

The role of collaboration in medical research and how it applies to emergency medicine research are discussed. The guidance of the Division of Health Sciences Policy of the Institute of Medicine is reviewed. Application of the principles of collaborative efforts and recognition of each individual's contribution are overviewed. Emergency physicians can and should be invaluable contributors to collaborative research. Collaborative research relationships, whether established at individual institutions or through national clinical trials, must be developed deliberately. The specialty of emergency medicine must take the necessary commitment of time and resources to ensure that these occur.

Emergency medical care for spectators attending National Football League games.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze medical care facilities and resources available for spectators attending football games in the current National Football League (NFL) stadiums. METHODS: A prospective, structured questionnaire regarding facilities, transportation, medications and equipment, personnel configuration, compensation, and communications was mailed to all 28 NFL organizations. Those falling to respond were interviewed by telephone using the identical questionnaire. Data were compiled using Lotus 1-2-3. RESULTS: Data were collected from all 28 NFL organizations. Because two teams use the same stadium, results were calculated for 27 facilities (n = 27). The number of stadium first aid rooms ranges from 1 to 7, with an average of 2.4 +/- 1.3 rooms per stadium (+/- 1 SD) and these vary in size from 120 to 2,000 square feet, with a mean of 434 +/- 377 square feet. Each room is equipped with an average of 3.3 +/- 2.9 stretchers (or tables), with telephones being present in 91% and sinks in 88% of all rooms. To provide contractual EMS coverage, stadiums use standard EMS system designs, including private (n = 19), fire department-based (n = 7), municipal (city/county) (n = 5), volunteer (n = 4), and hospital (n = 3). Nine stadiums employ more than one type of provider. All stadiums have a minimum of one ambulance dedicated on-site for spectators, with a range of 1 to 7, and a mean of 2.9 +/- 1.4. Golf carts are used for intrafacility patient transportation in 17 stadiums, with a range of 1 to 6, and a mean of 2.5 +/- 1.3. Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) medications and equipment are present in all NFL stadiums and are provided by the private EMS company (n = 16), stadium (n = 10), fire EMS (n = 7), hospitals (n = 4), municipal EMS (n = 2), and the local NFL organization (n = 1). Several facilities have more than one provider of ACLS medications and equipment. The majority of stadiums dispense acetaminophen (n = 25) and aspirin (n = 24). Some dispense antacids (n = 7) and antihistamines (n = 6). The average stadium staffs 8 EMT-Bs, 7 EMT-Ps, 3 registered nurses, and 2 physicians. Nine stadiums pay a predesignated fee per game to an agency to provide emergency care to spectators. Medical personnel are compensated by an hourly rate (n = 15), a fixed rate per event (n = 9), overtime wages (n = 3), or volunteerism (n = 4). Four NFL organizations pay their medical personnel by more than one type of compensation. Courtesy seats are provided to physicians and nurses in 1 stadium and to just physicians in 8 stadiums, with a range of 2 to 6 and a mean of 3.3 +/- 1.3. All stadiums use two-way radios for the communication and coordination of medical care in the stadium. Additionally, 20 use fixed telephones in the first aid rooms, 3 use cellular telephones, and 2 incorporate a pager system to dispatch personnel within the stadium. CONCLUSION: A wide variety of system designs, facilities, and personnel configurations are used to provide emergency medical care for spectators attending NFL games. This information may be useful for assisting those individuals responsible for organizing stadium medical coverage.

Open thoracotomy procedural competency: validity study of teaching and assessment modalities.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) reliability and validity estimates of three modalities used to assess open thoracotomy procedural competency and (2) the effect of computer practice on procedural performance as measured by the three assessment modalities. METHODS: An experimental, sequential assessment design with volunteer examinees completing all three assessment modalities (paper, computer, pig model) was implemented at the animal support facilities of a university medical school with an affiliated emergency medicine residency program. Level of physician training (student, resident, faculty) and type of computer practice (thoracotomy, cricothyrotomy) were independent variables. Procedural competency scores were determined for each modality; scores were defined in terms of performance time and performance accuracy for three thoracotomy procedures (opening the chest, pericardiotomy, and aortic cross-clamping). RESULTS: Thoracotomy performance on the pig reliably discriminated among examinees known to differ in level of training. However, computer simulation performance did not significantly differ among examinees with different levels of training. Computer simulation practice significantly improved later performance on the computer assessment (P < .05) but not on the pig assessment. The greatest predictor of procedural competency (time and accuracy) on the pig assessment was the ability to sequentially order procedural steps. CONCLUSION: This study establishes the pig model as superior to the paper and computer models as the criterion standard for open thoracotomy assessment. Psychometric properties support the pig model as the most reliable and valid model yet described for assessing thoracotomy procedural competency. Computer simulation practice using visual images (complex anatomy) and the sequential ordering of procedural steps through paper modeling show promise for teaching and assessment of prerequisite skills required to develop psychomotor procedural competency.

Research directions in emergency medicine.

The goal of emergency medicine is to improve health while preventing and treating disease and illness in patients seeking emergency medical care. Improvements in emergency medical care and the delivery of this care can be achieved through credible and meaningful research efforts. Improved delivery of emergency medical care through research requires careful planning and the wise use of limited resources. To achieve this goal, emergency medicine must provide appropriate training of young investigators and attract support for their work. Promotion of multidisciplinary research teams will help the specialty fulfill its goals. The result will be the improvement of emergency medical care which will benefit not only the patients emergency physicians serve but also, ultimately, the nation's health.

Emergency thoracotomy: comparison of medical student, resident, and faculty performances on written, computer, and animal-model assessments.

OBJECTIVE: In clinical practice, thoracotomy and other critical emergency procedures are rarely required. Consequently, medical students and residents have difficulty acquiring procedural competency in these critical procedures. The authors developed objective written, computer, and animal-model assessments of thoracotomy procedural competency to permit comparison of the reliability and validity of these three procedural assessment modalities. METHODS: Thoracotomy procedural competency was evaluated for 18 persons at three levels of training (medical student, resident, faculty), using written, computer, and animal-model assessments. A prospective, sequential assessment design was used, with the examinees serving as their own controls. Procedural competency was defined in terms of performance time (animal time scale) and performance accuracy (written accuracy, computer accuracy, and animal accuracy scales) for three thoracotomy procedures (opening the chest, pericardiotomy, and aortic cross-clamping). Level of training was the independent variable, and procedural competency scores were the outcome measures. Confounding variables included previous thoracotomy and computer experience. RESULTS: Computer and animal-model assessments produced reliable results (Chronbach's alpha > 0.50). The animal time scale and computer accuracy scale best reflected the expected skill differences among levels of physician training, providing support for construct validity. In contrast, written and animal accuracy scale scores did not significantly differ by level of physician training. Moreover, previous thoracotomy experience (i.e., number of procedures previously performed) was not a significant predictor of procedural competency. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that critical emergency medicine procedures can be evaluated reliably and validly using computer simulation and animal-model assessments. Neither previous thoracotomy experience nor knowledge of procedure content adequately predicts thoracotomy competency.