Major adverse cardiovascular events while awaiting staged non-culprit percutaneous coronary intervention after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The optimal therapeutic strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients found to have multi-vessel disease (MVD) is controversial but recent data support complete revascularisation (CR). Whether CR should be completed during the index admission or during a second staged admission remains unclear. Our main objective was to measure rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) during the waiting period in STEMI patients selected for staged revascularisation (SR), in order to determine the safety of delaying CR. For completeness, we also describe 30-day and long-term outcomes in STEMI patients with MVD who underwent in-hospital CR. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective analysis of 931 STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) identified 397 patients with MVD who were haemodynamically stable and presented within 12 hours of chest pain onset. Of these, 191 underwent multi-vessel PCI: 49 during the index admission and 142 patients undergoing a strategy of SR. RESULTS: Our main finding was that waiting period MACE were 2% (three of 142) in patients allocated to SR (at a median of 31 days). In patients allocated to in-hospital CR, 30-day MACE rates were 10% (five of 49). During a median follow up of 39 months, all-cause mortality was 7.0% vs. 28.6%, and cardiac mortality was 2% vs. 8%, in patients allocated to SR or CR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STEMI and MVD who, based on clinical judgement, were allocated to a second admission SR strategy had very few adverse events during the waiting period and excellent long-term outcomes.

Early collapse causing stenosis in a resorbable magnesium scaffold.

We report a case of early in-stent restenosis due to collapse of a Magmaris resorbable magnesium scaffold.

Changes in Implantation Patterns and Therapy Rates of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators over Time in Ischemic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines on implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy changed significantly in the last decades with potential inherent effects on therapy efficacy. We aimed to study therapy rates in time and the association between therapies and mortality. METHODS: All patients receiving an ICD, primary and secondary prevention, were included in a single-center retrospective registry. Information on first appropriate and inappropriate therapies was documented. Dates of implant were divided in P1: 1996-2001, P2: 2002-2008, and P3: 2009-2014. RESULTS: A total of 727 patients, 84.9% male-66.4% ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM)-56% primary prevention-mean follow-up 5.2 ± 4.1 years, were included. There was a shift from secondary to primary prevention indications, from ischemic to non-ICM, and from single chamber to cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator devices. The annual 1- and 3-year appropriate shock (AS) rate declined from 29.4% and 15.1% in P1, over 13.3% and 9.2% in P2 to 7.8% and 5.7% in P3 (log-rank P < 0.001), while inappropriate shock (IAS) rates remained unchanged (log-rank P = 0.635). After multivariate regression analysis a higher age at implant, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, history of stroke, diabetes mellitus, intake of loop diuretics or digitalis, higher creatinine, and longer QTc were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: These changes in clinical practice with a shift to primary prevention and rise in non-ICM implants caused a significant decrease in AS incidence, while IAS remained stable. Receiving AS or IAS was not an independent predictor of mortality in our real-life cohort.

Frequency of use of QT-interval prolonging drugs in psychiatry in Belgium.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced QT-prolongation is an established risk factor for Torsade de pointes and sudden cardiac death. The list of QT-prolonging drugs is extensive and includes many drugs commonly used in psychiatry. AIM: In this study we performed a cross-sectional analysis of medication profiles to assess the prevalence of drug interactions potentially leading to QT-prolongation. SETTING: 6 psychiatric hospitals in Flanders, Belgium. METHODS: For each patient, the full medication list was screened for the presence of interactions, with special attention to those with an increased risk for QT-prolongation. Current practice on QT monitoring and prevention of drug-induced arrhythmia was assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of drug interactions with risk of QT-prolongation. RESULTS: 592 patients (46 % female; mean age 55.7 ± 17.1 years) were included in the analysis. 113 QT-prolonging interactions were identified in 43 patients (7.3 %). QT-prolonging interactions occurred most frequently with antidepressants (n = 102) and antipsychotics (n = 100). The precautions and follow-up provided by the different institutions when combining QT-prolonging drugs were very diverse. CONCLUSION: Drug combinations that are associated with QT-prolongation are frequently used in the chronic psychiatric setting. Persistent efforts should be undertaken to provide caregivers with clear guidelines on how to use these drugs in a responsible and safe way.

Predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality after transvenous lead extraction: a single-centre experience.

AIMS: Owing to the increasing use of cardiac implantable electronic devices, there is a growing need for safe and effective techniques to manage device-related complications and lead dysfunction. Lead extraction remains a challenging procedure with inherent risks. We present the 30-day and long-term outcomes of lead extractions in the University Hospitals Leuven. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report a retrospective cohort study of 176 patients admitted to the University Hospitals Leuven between January 2005 and December 2011, for the transvenous extraction of 295 leads. Indications for extraction were lead dysfunction and device upgrade in 84 (47.7%), pocket infection in 61 (34.7%), and systemic infection in 31 patients (17.6%). Extraction was successful in 95.5% of patients with complete removal of the leads or only a minor fragment remaining. One fatal peri-procedural complication occurred. Thirty-day mortality was 3.4% (n = 6). Systemic infection was the only significant predictor of 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR) 29.706; P = 0.029]. A lower level of haemoglobin prior to extraction also tended to be related with a higher mortality, but this was not significant (OR 2.024; P = 0.082). One-year mortality was 8.5% (n = 15). Systemic infection (OR 9.727; P = 0.009), a lower level of haemoglobin (OR 1.597; P = 0.05), and a higher level of ureum (OR 1.021; P = 0.017) prior to extraction were significant predictors of 1-year mortality. Systemic infection was associated with significantly higher 30-day (19%), 1-year (32%), and long-term (39%) mortality rates. CONCLUSION: Lead extraction can be safely and successfully performed in the majority of patients, with limited life-threatening complications. However, lead extraction because of systemic infection is associated with a significantly higher risk of short- and long-term mortality.

Heart rate turbulence predicts ICD-resistant mortality in ischaemic heart disease.

AIMS: In high-risk patients, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can convert the mode of death from arrhythmic to pump failure death. Therefore, we introduced the concept of 'ICD-resistant mortality' (IRM), defined as death (a) without previous appropriate ICD intervention (AI), (b) within 1 month after the first AI, or (c) within 1 year after the initial ICD implantation. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with a high risk of IRM should be avoided. METHODS AND RESULTS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients with ischaemic heart disease were included if a digitized 24 h Holter was available pre-implantation. Demographic, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and 24 h Holter risk factors were collected at device implantation. The primary endpoint was IRM. Cox regression analyses were used to test the association between predictors and outcome. We included 130 patients, with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 33.6 ± 10.3%. During a follow-up of 52 ± 31 months, 33 patients died. There were 21 cases of IRM. Heart rate turbulence (HRT) was the only Holter parameter associated with IRM and total mortality. A higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and a lower body mass index were the strongest predictors of IRM. Left ventricular ejection fraction predicted IRM on univariate analysis, and was the strongest predictor of total mortality. The only parameter that predicted AI was non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. CONCLUSION: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation based on NYHA class and LVEF leads to selection of patients with a higher risk of IRM and death. Heart rate turbulence may have added value for the identification of poor candidates for ICD therapy. Available Holter parameters seem limited in their ability to predict AI.

How to choose between a pacemaker or defibrillator for resynchronization therapy?

OBJECTIVE: The choice between a resynchronization pacemaker (CRT-P) or defibrillator (CRT-D) is still a matter of debate. We hypothesised that when selecting patients based on co-morbidities and age as proposed by the ESC-guidelines, there would be no long-term survival benefit of CRT-D compared to CRT-P. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who received a CRT device at the University Hospitals Leuven between 2001 and 2007. For the analysis of the association between predictors and outcome, uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. We present data from three multivariate models. RESULTS: A total of 144 CRT devices were implanted (CRT-D n=98, CRT-P n=46). Patients who received a CRT-P were older and had a higher prevalence of co-morbidities. Patients who received a CRT-D had a significant lower mortality. When applying incremental multivariate analysis using 1st variables with a P < 0.05 in univariate analysis, 2nd variables with a P < 0.10 and 3rd adding on top all the baseline variables that were significantly different between the two groups, the significance of a possible survival benefit for CRT-D over CRT-P disappeared: risk model 1, hazard ratio 2.21 (P = 0.008), risk model 2, HR 1.81 (P = 0.069), and risk model 3, HR 1.85 (P = 0.091). The use of amiodarone and the presence of COPD or renal insufficiency remained associated with a significant, higher mortality risk, while the use of beta blockers was protective in all three models. CONCLUSION: The choice of a CRT-D seemed a predictor of improved survival in simple but not in more complex multivariable analyses. The fact that the survival benefit strongly depended on the number of co-variables suggests that it is at most marginal.

Ictal asystole: case report with review of literature.

Cardiac arrhythmias are frequently observed during epileptic seizures. Mostly they are benign, but severe bradycardia and asystole occur in 0.27-0.5% of patients who have seizures on video-EEG monitoring units. Especially patients with partial seizures involving the insular, orbital frontal and anterior temporal lobe regions, are at risk. Ictal bradycardia could be a cause of SUDEP (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy) and pacemaker insertion might therefore improve survival in selected cases, although more research is needed to prove this. We present a case of prolonged ictal asystole in a patient with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy originating from the temporal lobe.

Transcatheter arterial embolization for iatrogenic hemobilia is a safe and effective procedure: case series and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Hemobilia is an uncommon cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. The etiology is diverse, but most often, it is iatrogenic. The present study aims to reassess the clinical picture and the treatment of choice. METHODS: We describe a case series from a single center of patients who presented with nontraumatic iatrogenic hemobilia. RESULTS: Over a period of 8 years, hemobilia occurred in 12 patients: following liver biopsy in six patients and after endoscopic biliary interventions in four patients, with a respective prevalence of 0.1 and 0.04%. The clinical presentation was characterized by an upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n=11) and/or biochemical signs of sudden biliary obstruction (n=9). The onset of the symptoms occurred after a median of 6 days (range: 1-23). Ultrasound and computed tomography scan missed the diagnosis in, respectively, 4/5 and 2/5 of patients. On arteriography, pseudoaneurysm (6/12) was the most common finding. Transcatheter arterial embolization controlled the bleeding in all cases (12/12) without major complications. CONCLUSION: The delay between the intervention and the clinical presentation and the fact that imaging studies may fail to diagnose hemobilia may mislead the physician. Transcatheter arterial embolization is the treatment of choice for hemobilia. It has proven to be effective and safe and it offers a long-term definitive cure.