Cultural adaptation of the female pelvic floor questionnaire (FPFQ) into French.

AIMS: The Female pelvic floor questionnaire (FPFQ) is a self-administered tool on pelvic floor function. Our aim was to carry out a cultural adaptation of the FPFQ into French and to assess its psychometric properties. METHODS: After cross-cultural adaptation into French, acceptability and reliability of the questionnaire were assessed through a sample of 56 women in a test-retest. Discriminative construct validity was evaluated by comparing the results obtained by the FPFQ to those of other validated questionnaires. Longitudinal follow-up of the 282 pregnant women included in the PreNatal Pelvic floor Prevention trial (3PN) was used to analyze responsiveness. RESULTS: The proportion of missing data did not exceed 4% for questions about bladder function, bowel function, and pelvic organ prolapse; 10% for issues related to sexual function. Question 9 was considered difficult to understand by 14% of women. After rewriting, this issue was retested in a new sample of 52 women and presented no further problems. The intra-class correlation coefficient was greater than or equal to 0.7 for all domains during the test-retest. The FPFQ was strongly and significantly correlated (Spearman r > 0.5) with the other validated questionnaires. The French version of FPFQ recorded changes in urinary and sexual symptoms for the women involved in 3PN trial with a standardized response mean equal to 0.83 and 0.44, respectively. CONCLUSION: The French version of the FPFQ is self-administered, reliable, valid, and can detect a change in symptoms during follow-up. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:253-258, 2017. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Clinical impact of negative-pressure wound therapy: a 1,126-patient observational prospective study.

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was developed in the early 1990s and reported in 1997 by Argenta and Morykwas. Ignored at first, this technique progressively came to be considered as an outstanding advancement in reconstructive surgery. Several randomized controlled studies produced evidence for the effect of NPWT on promotion of granulation tissue formation and prevention of tissue damage and amputation. However, no important longitudinal study has yet produced clinical and economic data on the consequences of integrating NPWT into practice in multiple institutions. This prospective, comparative longitudinal study of NPWT as a clinical-practice innovation was conducted in 1,126 patients between March 2006 and June 2009 in 30 university and nonuniversity public and private hospitals in France. NPWT was proposed in a nonrandomized fashion for various clinical indications, and the patients were divided into two groups, one using NPWT, the second using standard care. Efficacy criteria were spontaneous closure, closure after surgical coverage using skin grafts or flaps, or achievement of 40% wound area regression. The results, observed in a pragmatic but not randomized study, are suggestive of a favorable impact of NPWT in multiple clinical situations. The significance of differences between surgical patients who underwent NPWT and those who did not was unclear, as NPWT had already been adopted by most of the surgical wards.