Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.

PURPOSE: To compare 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) images of porcine knee specimens containing artificial cartilage lesions in terms of accuracy of lesion depiction, image quality, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and informed consent was obtained from the human volunteers. Two fat-saturated cartilage MR imaging sequences (an intermediate-weighted fast spin-echo [SE] sequence and a spoiled gradient-echo [GRE] sequence) were optimized for imaging at 3.0 T in two human volunteers and then used to image 10 porcine knees in which 29 artificial cartilage lesions had been created. Corresponding sequences were used at 1.5 T for all specimens. Images were assessed by two radiologists in consensus, and diagnostic performance in lesion depiction was determined by using macroscopic findings in specimen slices as a reference standard. SNRs were also calculated. For statistical analysis, the McNemar test of discordant pairs was used with a level of significance of P < .05. RESULTS: The best diagnostic performance for both the intermediate-weighted fast SE and the spoiled GRE sequences was achieved at 3.0 T. With use of corresponding fat-saturated intermediate-weighted fast SE sequences with an identical acquisition time (9 minutes 44 seconds), 26 (90%) of 29 lesions were detected at 3.0 T, while 18 (62%) were detected at 1.5 T. With use of fat-saturated spoiled GRE sequences, 24 (83%) of 29 lesions were detected at 3.0 T (acquisition time, 8 minutes 48 seconds), and 23 (79%) lesions were detected at 1.5 T (acquisition time, 11 minutes 14 seconds). The rate of correct lesion grade assessment was 65% (17 of 26 lesions) at 3.0 T and 61% (11 of 18 lesions) at 1.5 T with the intermediate-weighted fast SE sequences and 83% (20 of 24 lesions) at 3.0 T and 70% (16 of 23 lesions) at 1.5 T with the spoiled GRE sequences. Both subjective evaluation of image quality and SNR values were significantly higher at 3.0 T (P < .05). CONCLUSION: In this animal model, MR imaging at 3.0 T increased the accuracy of cartilage lesion assessment when compared with imaging at 1.5 T. Image quality and SNR were highest at 3.0 T.

Computer-aided quantification of focal cartilage lesions using MRI: accuracy and initial arthroscopic comparison.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to validate a Gradient Peak Method (GPM) by evaluating its accuracy and consistency at different magnetic field strengths. The GPM using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was previously proposed to quantitatively assess the morphology of focal cartilage lesions, and its feasibility was demonstrated. METHODS: GPM quantifies the morphologic properties of cartilage lesions based on their three-dimensional geometry. Twenty-two conical and cylindrical lesions were surgically created on fresh porcine knees, and the results obtained by GPM were compared with manually measured lesion dimensions. Another 15 focal lesions of various shapes were created and scanned, and the quantification results were compared at 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla. Additionally, cartilage lesions in three patients were scanned, quantified by GPM, and compared with arthroscopic visualization and measurements. RESULTS: The average absolute errors of GPM (depth: < or =0.4mm; diameter: < or =1.4mm) were within twice the in-plane resolution in depth estimates and within the slice thickness in diameter estimates. Analysis also suggested that the quantifications of GPM using 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla data were not statistically different. Moreover, the GPM results were shown to be consistent with the lesion measurements obtained arthroscopically. CONCLUSIONS: The GPM using MRI provides estimates of lesion thickness, depth, diameter, and area. With this validation, the method can be potentially used as an auxiliary tool to help radiologists and physicians assess cartilage lesions quantitatively and monitor disease progression.

Optimization of gadodiamide concentration for MR arthrography at 3 T.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine the optimal concentration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (gadodiamide) for direct MR arthrography at 3 T compared with 1.5 T in an in vitro study. CONCLUSION: Optimized concentrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents for MR arthrography are similar at 3 and 1.5 T, although a slightly greater dilution may be useful at 3 T. Signal-to-noise ratio peak levels are significantly reduced by adding an iodinated contrast agent, relatively significantly more at 3 T than at 1.5 T.