RESUMO
Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) is becoming a standard diagnostic tool for curable hematological malignancies such as chronic and acute myeloid leukemia. Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, as a major portion of patients even in complete response eventually relapse, suggesting that residual disease remains. Over the past decade, the treatment landscape of MM has radically changed with the introduction of new effective drugs and the availability of immunotherapy, including targeted antibodies and adoptive cell therapy. Therefore, conventional serological and morphological techniques have become suboptimal for the evaluation of depth of response. Recently, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) introduced the definition of MRD negativity as the absence of clonal Plasma cells (PC) with a minimum sensitivity of <10-5 either by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the LymphoSIGHT platform (Sequenta/Adaptative) or by next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) using EuroFlow approaches as the reference methods. While the definition of the LymphoSIGHT platform (Sequenta/Adaptive) as the standard method derives from its large use and validation in clinical studies on the prognostic value of NGS-based MRD, other commercially available options exist. Recently, the LymphoTrack assay has been evaluated in MM, demonstrating a sensitivity level of 10-5, hence qualifying as an alternative effective tool for MRD monitoring in MM. Here, we will review state-of-the-art methods for MRD assessment by NGS. We will summarize how MRD testing supports clinical trials as a useful tool in dynamic risk-adapted therapy. Finally, we will also discuss future promise and challenges of NGS-based MRD determination for clinical decision-making. In addition, we will present our real-life single-center experience with the commercially available NGS strategy LymphoTrack-MiSeq. Even with the limitation of a limited number of patients, our results confirm the LymphoTrack-MiSeq platform as a cost-effective, readily available, and standardized workflow with a sensitivity of 10-5. Our real-life data also confirm that achieving MRD negativity is an important prognostic factor in MM.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with a mechanical prosthetic heart valve implantation need to be treated with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) due to a substantially high risk of thromboembolism. In this study we report data on patients with mechanical heart valves (MV), with the aim of evaluating the thromboembolic risk in relation to the type and site of implantation, quality of anticoagulation and risk factors associated with thromboembolism. METHODS: Observational retrospective multicenter study among Centers affiliated to the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics (FCSA) on patients with MV implanted after 1990 and followed for the management of anticoagulation. RESULTS: We analyzed 2357 patients with mechanical heart valves (55.2% males), followed for 24,081â¯years. During the follow-up, 164 thromboembolic events (0.67/100â¯pt-yrs) and 243 major bleedings (1.0/100â¯pt-yrs) occurred. The median Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR), calculated in all intended INR classes, was 60% (IQR 47-74%). The rates of thrombotic events were significantly higher in patients intended to stay at therapeutic ranges >INR 2.0-3.0. The presence of atrial fibrillation, history of thromboembolism and of mitral prosthesis were independently associated with thromboembolism. However, a bad quality of anticoagulation (TTR <47%, 25°percentile of our population) was not correlated with thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients with mechanical heart valves were found, despite the sub-optimal anticoagulation control. The thromboembolic risk was not associated with the low TTR.
