Is current clinical practice modified about intraoperative breast irradiation?

After the results obtained in the two randomized clinical trial, the ELIOT trial and the TARGIT-A trial, a heated debate is going on concerning the question of applying intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) instead of postoperative whole breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conservative treatment. Currently, many centers are applying the IORT following the strict selection criteria dictated by the working groups American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) and monitoring the oncological outcome together with radiation toxicity on breast tissue. The clinical experience of the Geneva University Hospital regarding the use of the Intrabeam system is evaluated and compared with current evidences.

Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: factors affecting the accuracy of preoperative lesion sizing.

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative sizing of breast cancer with imaging modalities has a great importance in the surgical planning. PURPOSE: To assess the influence of tumor size and histology on the accuracy of measurement of cancer local extension by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-six patients with primary breast cancer, for a total of 221 lesions, were included in this retrospective study. Tumors were divided into five histological groups: invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), IDC with extensive intraductal component (EIC), invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and "other histology" (mucinous, papillary, medullary, tubular, and apocrine breast cancer). Microscopic measurement of the largest diameter of tumors at pathology was chosen as reference standard and compared with MRI measurement. Concordance was defined as a difference ≤ 5 mm between MRI and pathology. RESULTS: The mean size of tumors at pathology was 24.8 ± 19.4 mm, while at MRI it was 29.7 ± 20 mm (P < 0.05), with a significant overestimation of MRI. MRI-pathology concordance was found in 98/221 cases (44.3%), while MRI overestimated the size of 81/221 tumors (36.7%). The extent of overestimation was significantly different among the five histological groups (P < 0.05). At multivariate analysis, DCIS histology was the factor more significantly associated with MRI-pathology discordance (P = 0.0005), while the influence of tumor dimension at pathology was less significant (P = 0.0073). CONCLUSION: DCIS histology is strongly associated with discordance between MRI and pathology sizing of breast cancer. Lesion size can also influence the accuracy of MRI measurements, but to a lesser extent.

Flat epithelial atypia: comparison between 9-gauge and 11-gauge devices.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to establish if women with a diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) without residual microcalcifications at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) could be managed with mammographic follow-up (FU) instead of surgery and to compare 9-gauge and 11-gauge devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2003 to January 2011, 2382 VABB procedures were performed (1373 with 11-gauge and 1009 with 9-gauge). We found 121 cases of pure FEA that were surgically treated: 57 with a 9-gauge device (group 1) and 64 with an 11-gauge device (group 2). The underestimation rate (UR) of malignancy for patients without and those with residual microcalcifications for each VABB device was calculated. Differences between groups were analyzed with the Fischer exact test. RESULTS: The overall UR of FEA was 4% (2 of 57) with the 9-gauge device and 8% (5 of 64) with the 11-gauge device. With a 9-gauge device, the UR for patients without residual microcalcifications was 0% (0 of 46), and the UR for patients with residual microcalcifications was 18% (2 of 11). With an 11-gauge device, the UR for patients without residual microcalcifications was 0% (0 of 39), the UR for patients with residual microcalcifications at post-biopsy mammograms was 16% (5 of 25). With a 9-gauge device, 80% (46 of 57) of patients did not have residual microcalcifications after VABB. With an 11-gauge device, 60% (39 of 64) of patients had no residual microcalcifications after VABB. Differences between the 9-gauge and 11-gauge devices were statistically significant (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Women with FEA without residual microcalcifications after VABB can be managed conservatively. Nine-gauge VABB is associated with a lower percentage of residual microcalcifications compared with an 11-gauge device, but it is safe to follow patients with FEA if all calcifications are removed with the core biopsy.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation via the mammosite catheter: preliminary reports of a single-institution experience.

Several studies have shown that the majority of in-breast recurrences following lumpectomy are at or near the original tumor site while ipsilateral breast recurrences further a field occur rarely. This suggests that the radiation dose could be delivered exclusively to the tumor bed, allowing larger fractions to be used without increasing toxicity and shortening the total treatment time. We investigated the use of the MammoSite irradiation system with a view to analyzing complications, cosmesis and patient comfort. Between 2004 and 2007 intracavity brachytherapy was given to 30 patients using the MammoSite device. The reference isodose was prescribed to the lumpectomy cavity with a 1 cm margin. Geometric parameters and anatomic position of the applicator after implantation were checked via CT, x-ray and ultrasound. Analysis was done for patient quality of life, cosmesis, early and late complications. Forty-nine patients received a proposal for MammoSite brachytherapy. Nine declined, 40 enrolled while 10 were excluded for various reasons (Table 5). A total of 30 patients were actually treated to 34 Gy (2 x 3.4 Gy) in 5 days. We observed 3 cases (10%) of infection within 3 months of implantation. Symptomatic seroma was seen in five patients (16.6%) at 6 months, in three (10%) at 12 months, and in just one patient (3.3%) at 18 months. Good to excellent cosmetic results were achieved in 75% by patient and physician ratings. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using the MammoSite catheter produces favorable short-term outcomes, limited toxic effects on skin, and optimal cosmetic results. Patient tolerance for the treatment is very high. Critical issues may regard the importance of good cavity conformance and adequate balloon-skin distance in avoiding possible dose excesses to the skin. For a selected patient group, this could be a valid alternative to conventional whole breast irradiation.