Changes in Speech Range Profile Are Associated with Cognitive Impairment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the variations in the speech range profile (SRP) of patients affected by cognitive decline. METHODS: We collected the data of patients managed for suspected voice and speech disorders, and suspected cognitive impairment. Patients underwent an Ear Nose and Throat evaluation and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). To obtain SRP, we asked the patients to read 18 sentences twice, at their most comfortable pitch and loudness as they would do in daily conversation, and recorded their voice on to computer software. RESULTS: The study included 61 patients. The relationship between the MMSE score and SRP parameters was established. Increased severity of the MMSE score resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the average values of the semitones to the phonetogram, and the medium and maximum sound pressure levels (p<0.001). The maximum predictivity of MMSE was based on the highly significant values of semitones (p<0.001) and the maximum sound pressure levels (p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The differences in SRP between the various groups were analyzed. Specifically, the SRP value decreased with increasing severity of cognitive decline. SRP was useful in highlighting the relationship between all cognitive declines tested and speech.

Singing voice: acoustic parameters after vocal warm-up and cool-down.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the vocal warm-up and cool-down on the singing voice through Fundamental Frequency (F0), Jitter, Shimmer and harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR).Methods: Thirty-two female singing students were recorded four times while uttering the vowel [a] for at least 5''. The first two recordings were collected before and after a vocal warm-up session and the last two before and after a vocal cool-down session. Between those sessions the participants underwent an intense vocal activity.Results: Results showed significant variations in the average values of the parameters measured. The mean value of the F0 after intense vocal activity turned to be higher than the one measured before the warm-up session, as well as the mean F0 measured after singing compared to the one measured after the vocal warm-up. On the other end, the mean F0 after the vocal cool-down resulted to be lower than that measured before. After the vocal warm-up session Jitter and Shimmer decreased while HNR increased. In addition, a decrease was detected in comparison with the average value of Jitter and Shimmer before vocal warm-up and after vocal cool-down, whereas HNR increased. There was also a decrease between the Shimmer before the vocal warm-up and after an intense phonatory activity while HNR increased.Conclusions: Our study highlights the effect of the vocal warm-up on acoustic parameters. The reduction in F0 observed after the cool-down session confirms its positive effect in helping professional vocal recovery and reducing vocal fold tension.

An electronic nose distinguishes exhaled breath of patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma from controls.

BACKGROUND: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) is a tumour of the surface cells of the pleura that is highly aggressive and mainly caused by asbestos exposure. Electronic noses capture the spectrum of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) providing a composite biomarker profile (breathprint). OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that an electronic nose can discriminate exhaled air of patients with MPM from subjects with a similar long-term professional exposure to asbestos without MPM and from healthy controls. METHODS: 13 patients with a histology confirmed diagnosis of MPM (age 60.9±12.2 year), 13 subjects with certified, long-term professional asbestos exposure (age 67.2±9.8), and 13 healthy subjects without asbestos exposure (age 52.2±16.2) participated in a cross-sectional study. Exhaled breath was collected by a previously described method and sampled by an electronic nose (Cyranose 320). Breathprints were analyzed by canonical discriminant analysis on principal component reduction. Cross-validated accuracy (CVA) was calculated. RESULTS: Breathprints from patients with MPM were separated from subjects with asbestos exposure (CVA: 80.8%, sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 85.7%). MPM was also distinguished from healthy controls (CVA: 84.6%). Repeated measurements confirmed these results. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular pattern recognition of exhaled breath can correctly distinguish patients with MPM from subjects with similar occupational asbestos exposure without MPM and from healthy controls. This suggests that breathprints obtained by electronic nose have diagnostic potential for MPM.

Ultrasound imaging diagnostics: healthcare risks for urologists.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are: 1) assessing if Ultrasound (US) used during US scans can represent a risk for the healthcare of urologists; 2) verifying the frequency of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) symptoms and musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), trying to assess the possible correlation with job load and US scanning procedures; 3) assessing the role of individual factors like age, gender and physical activity in determining such disorders. METHODS: A group of 35 voluntary urologists carrying out ultrasound scans were selected: 13 were working for the 1 degrees Teaching Hospital Urology, 11 for the 2 degrees Teaching Hospital Urology, 2 for the Hospitalization Urology of the Policlinico of Bari and 9 for Urology of Public Corporation Di Venere of Bari. A questionnaire, divided in two parts, was administered to the sample: the first aimed at collecting demographic data and at describing the operators' workload and the second focused on the possible presence of CTS and MSD symptoms. RESULTS: 32 urologists over 35 performed more than 5 scans per week and more than 5 scans per day. On average the specialists were carrying out this activity since 18 years wheras for post-graduate students, this time was about 4 years. Twenty-six subjects (74%) showed no symptoms, 8 subjects (23%) showed from 1 to 4 symptoms which can be associated to the presence of CTS; only one subject presents more than 5 symptoms. As regards MSD, 6 urologists (17%) did not present disorders, 24 subjects (69%) showed from 1 to 4 symptoms and 5 subjects (14%) presented more than 5 symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The use of US scan examination is completely safe both for the healthcare of the patients and the operator. For what concerns healthcare risks, it is highly recommended to adopt a correct posture when performing the examination and to use the provided chair.