[Analysis of Preventive Cases Using Resilience Engineering in Radiotherapy Department].

PURPOSE: Resilience engineering is the ability of a system to adjust its own functions and maintain the required behavior in the face of changes and disturbances, and resilience potential is a necessary requirement. We aimed to clarify the relationship between resilience potential and error prevention cases. METHOD: Based on the error cases reported in our department, we aggregated the relationship with resilience potential for each radiation treatment process. RESULT: As a result of tabulating the relationship, we were able to recognize and prevent errors by taking preventive measures from past cases. On the other hand, in cases that slipped through the check mechanism, errors were discovered because of a sense of discomfort in unusual situations, and some error cases could be prevented by increasing the resilience potential. CONCLUSION: This study found that preparation, observation, coping, and utilization of past experiences are related to resilience potential in preventive cases.

Reduction of margin to compensate the respiratory tumor motion by the analysis of dosimetric internal target volume in lung SBRT with nonuniform volume prescription method.

PURPOSE: To develop a dosimetric internal target volume (ITV) margin (DIM) for respiratory motion in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and to evaluate DIM with a nonuniform volume prescription (NVP) and the point prescription (PP). METHODS: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans with PP and NVP were created on a heterogeneous programmable respiratory motion phantom, with a tumor (30-mm diameter) inside a cylindrical lung insert. The tumor was defined as the gross tumor volume (GTV), equal to the clinical target volume (CTV). Five-millimeter and 0-mm margins were used for the ITV and setup margins, respectively. The phantom was moved in cranio-caudal direction with a biquadratic sinusoidal waveform with a 4-s cycle and an amplitude of ±5-10 mm. The interplay effect was evaluated by measuring the dose profile with a film in the sagittal plane for different respiratory periods and different initial respiratory phases. DIM was based on the respiratory motion amplitude that satisfied 100% and 95% coverage of the prescribed dose by the minimum dose of the CTV. Moreover, the absolute dose was measured with and without respiratory motion for NVP by a pinpoint chamber. RESULTS: The dose difference in the tumor region due to the interplay effect was within 1.0%. The gamma passing rate was over 95.1% for different respiratory periods and 98.6% for different initial respiratory phases. DIM with PP was almost equivalent to the margin of the respiratory motion. However, DIM with NVP was 2.0 and 1.8 times larger than the margin of the respiratory motion for the 100% and 95% coverage of the prescribed doses, respectively. CONCLUSION: The interplay effects experienced between the MLC sequence and tumor motion were negligible for NVP. The DIM analysis revealed that the margin to compensate the respiratory tumor motion could be reduced by more than 44-50% for NVP in SBRT.

Interfractional diaphragm changes during breath-holding in stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver cancer.

AIM AND BACKGROUND: IGRT based on bone matching may produce a large target positioning error in terms of the reproducibility of expiration breath-holding on SBRT for liver cancer. We evaluated the intrafractional and interfractional errors using the diaphragm position at the end of expiration by utilising Abches and analysed the factor of the interfractional error. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intrafractional and interfractional errors were measured using a couple of frontal kV images, planning computed tomography (pCT) and daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Moreover, max-min diaphragm position within daily CBCT image sets with respect to pCT and the maximum value of diaphragm position difference between CBCT and pCT were calculated. RESULTS: The mean ± SD (standard deviation) of the intra-fraction diaphragm position variation in the frontal kV images was 1.0 ± 0.7 mm in the C-C direction. The inter-fractional diaphragm changes were 0.4 ± 4.6 mm in the C-C direction, 1.4 ± 2.2 mm in the A-P direction, and -0.6 ± 1.8 mm in the L-R direction. There were no significant differences between the maximum value of the max-min diaphragm position within daily CBCT image sets with respect to pCT and the maximum value of diaphragm position difference between CBCT and pCT. CONCLUSIONS: Residual intrafractional variability of diaphragm position is minimal, but large interfractional diaphragm changes were observed. There was a small effect in the patient condition difference between pCT and CBCT. The impact of the difference in daily breath-holds on the interfractional diaphragm position was large or the difference in daily breath-holding heavily influenced the interfractional diaphragm change.

Evaluation of beam modeling for small fields using a flattening filter-free beam.

The characteristics of a flattening filter-free (FFF) beam are different from those of a beam with a flattening filter. For small-field dosimetry, the beam data needed by the radiation treatment planning system (RTPS) includes the percent depth dose (PDD), off-center ratio (OCR), and output factor (OPF) for field sizes down to 3 × 3 cm2 to calculate the beam model. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of calculations for the FFF beam by the Eclipse™ treatment planning system for field sizes smaller than 3 × 3 cm2 (2 × 2 and 1 × 1 cm2). We used 6X and 10X FFF beams by the Varian TrueBeam™ to produce. The AAA and AXB algorithms of the Eclipse were used to compare the Monte Carlo (MC) calculation and the measurements from three dosimeters, a diode detector, a PinPoint dosimeter, and EBT3 film. The PDD curves and the penumbra width in the OCR calculated by the Eclipse, measured data, and those from the MC calculations were in good agreement to within ±2.8 % and ±0.6 mm, respectively. However, the difference in the OPF values between AAA and AXB for a field size of 1 × 1 cm2 was 5.3 % for the 6X FFF beam and 7.6 % for the 10X FFF beam. Therefore, we have to confirm the small field data that is included for the RTPS commission procedures.

Impact of reduction of flux overlap region on kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography image quality and patients' exposure dose.

AIM: In high-precision radiation therapy, kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography plays an important role in verifying the position of patient and localization of the target. However, the exposure dose is a problem with kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography. Flux overlap region increases the patient dose around the center when the scan is performed in a full-scan mode. We assessed the influence of flux overlap region in a full-scan mode to understand the relationship between dose and image quality and investigated methods to achieve a dose reduction. METHOD: A Catphan phantom was scanned using various flux overlap region patterns in the pelvis on a full-scan mode. We used an intensity-modulated radiation therapy phantom for measuring the central dose. DoseLab was used to perform image analysis and to evaluate the linearity of the computed tomography values, uniformity, high-contrast resolution, and contrast-to-noise ratio. RESULTS: The Hounsfield unit value varied by ±40 Hounsfield unit of the acceptance value for the X1 field size of 3.5 cm. However, there were no differences in high-contrast resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio among different scan patterns. The absorbed dose decreased by 7% at maximum for the case within the tolerance value. CONCLUSION: Dose reduction is possible by reducing the overlap region after calibration and by performing computed tomography in the appropriate overlap region.

Availability of applying diaphragm matching with the breath-holding technique in stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver tumors.

PURPOSE: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) based on bone matching can produce large target-positioning errors because of expiration breath-hold reproducibility during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver tumors. Therefore, the feasibility of diaphragm-based 3D image matching between planning computed tomography (CT) and pretreatment cone-beam CT was investigated. METHODS: In 59 liver SBRT cases, Lipiodol uptake after transarterial chemoembolization was defined as a tumor marker. Further, the relative isocenter coordinate that was obtained by Lipiodol matching was defined as the reference coordinate. The distance between the relative isocenter coordinate and reference coordinate, which was obtained from diaphragm matching and bone matching techniques, was defined as the target positioning error. Furthermore, the target positioning error between liver matching and Lipiodol matching was evaluated. RESULTS: The positioning errors in all directions by the diaphragm matching were significantly smaller than those obtained by using by the bone matching technique (p < 0.05). Further, the positioning errors in the A-P and C-C directions that were obtained by using liver matching were significantly smaller than those obtained by using bone matching (p < 0.05). The estimated PTV margins calculated by the formula proposed by van Herk for diaphragm matching, liver matching, and bone matching were 5.0 mm, 5.0 mm, and 11.6 mm in the C-C direction; 3.6 mm, 2.4 mm, and 6.9 mm in the A-P direction; and 2.6 mm, 4.1 mm, and 4.6 mm in the L-R direction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragm matching-based IGRT may be an alternative image matching technique for determining liver tumor positions in patients.

[Availability of using diaphragm matching in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) at the time in breath-holding SBRT for liver cancer].

PURPOSE: Liver image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) based on bone matching risks generating serious target positioning errors for reasons of lack of reproducibility of expiration breath hold. We therefore investigated the feasibility of 3D image matching between planning CT images and pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images based on diaphragm surface matching. METHOD: 27 liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) cases in whom trancecatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) had been performed in advance of radiotherapy were manually image-matched based on contrast, Lipiodol used in the TACE as the marker of the tumor, and the relative coordinates of the isocenter obtained by contrast matching, defined as the reference coordinate. The target positioning difference between diaphragm matching and bone matching were evaluated by using relative coordinates of the isocenter from the reference obtained for each matching technique. RESULTS: The target positioning error using diaphragm matching and bone matching was 1.31±0.83 and 3.10±2.80 mm in the cranial-caudal (C-C) direction, 1.04±0.95 and 1.62±1.02 mm in the anterior-posterior (A-P) direction, and 0.93±1.19 and 1.12±0.94 mm in the left-right (L-R) direction, respectively. The positioning error due to diaphragm matching was significantly smaller than for bone matching in the C-C direction (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: IGRT based on diaphragm matching has potential as an alternative image matching technique for the positioning of liver patients.