RESUMO
Diagnostic and prognostic assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) presents ethical and clinical implications as they may affect the course of medical treatment and the decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapy. There has been increasing research in this field to lower misdiagnosis rates by developing standardized and consensual tools to detect consciousness. In this article, we summarize recent evidence regarding behavioral signs that are not yet included in the current clinical guidelines but could detect consciousness. The new potential behavioral signs of consciousness described here are as follows: resistance to eye opening, spontaneous eye blink rate, auditory localization, habituation of auditory startle reflex, olfactory sniffing, efficacy of swallowing/oral feeding, leg crossing, facial expressions to noxious stimulation, and subtle motor behaviors. All of these signs show promising results in discriminating patients' level of consciousness. Multimodal studies with large sample sizes in different centers are needed to further evaluate whether these behaviors reliably indicate the presence of consciousness. Future translation of these research findings into clinical practice has potential to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and prognostication for patients with DoC.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas , Estado de Consciência , Encéfalo , Estado de Consciência/fisiologia , Transtornos da Consciência/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Consciência/etiologia , Humanos , PrognósticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Blink reflex (BR) under general anesthesia as an intraoperative neuromonitoring method was used to monitor facial nerves in few studies. This study aimed to test the utility of intraoperative BR during cerebellopontine angle and skull base surgeries, assess its prognostic value for facial nerve functions, and compare it with facial corticobulbar motor evoked potentials (CoMEPs). METHODS: Blink reflex and facial CoMEPs were recorded from 40 patients undergoing skull base surgeries. Subdermal needles were placed in the supraorbital notch for stimulation and in the orbicularis oculi muscle for recording the BR. A double train of 20 to 40 V intensity with an intertrain interval of 40 to 60 milliseconds, an interstimulus interval of 2.5 milliseconds, and a stimulus duration of 0.5 milliseconds were applied. Facial nerve functions were assessed with the House-Brackmann grading system in the postoperative day 1 and third-month period and correlated with intraoperative BR and CoMEPs measurements. RESULTS: Of 40 patients, BR was recordable on the affected side in 32 (80%) and contralateral side in 35 (87.5%) patients. According to our statistical results, BR had a slightly better sensitivity than facial CoMEPs in predicting impairment of facial nerve functions for both postoperative and third-month time points. Blink reflex showed better accuracy for predicting postoperative nerve functions, whereas CoMEPs correlated better in predicting third-month outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that BR is a valuable intraoperative neuromonitoring method that can be used in addition to facial CoMEPs during skull base surgeries to assess real-time facial nerve integrity and predict prognosis.