Reducing unnecessary premedication prior to parenteral iron therapy: A quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) iron carries risks of mild, self-limiting, tryptase-negative Fishbane and complement activation-related pseudo-allergy reactions, with rare reports of anaphylaxis. Historically, high-molecular-weight iron dextran (HMWID) was associated with a higher incidence of anaphylaxis and empiric premedication with antihistamines/corticosteroids have been used to mitigate this risk. HMWID is no longer available and the risk of hypersensitivity reactions with newer IV iron formulations is low. Therefore, the use of routine prophylactic premedication in all patients is not justified but should be considered in high-risk patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Our primary aim was to reduce inappropriate premedication before IV iron administration by 50% so that our institution's hematology providers only prescribe premedications to patients at high risk of having a severe reaction. Interventions included a multidisciplinary education initiative to highlight current evidence against universal administration of premedications and revision of the IV iron informed consent form and electronic order set. RESULTS: We measured the success of our intervention by comparing data collected during a 6-month pre-intervention period (837 infusions) to a 6-month post-intervention period (947 infusions). Inappropriate administration of premedications decreased from 79% in the pre-intervention period compared to 65% in the post-intervention period. We found no significant difference in the number of Fishbane reactions, severe reactions, and emergency room admissions, despite this reduction in premedication use. DISCUSSION: Although we did not reach our goal of a 50% reduction in inappropriate premedication use, opportunities for process improvements were uncovered and are being explored in the next cycle of this quality improvement project.

Dysfibrinogenemia: discrepant results following infusion of purified fibrinogen.

Inherited dysfibrinogenemias are molecular disorders of fibrinogen that affect fibrin polymerization. The majority of cases are asymptomatic, but a significant proportion suffer from increased bleeding or thrombosis. We present two unrelated cases of dysfibrinogenemia, both of whom showed a characteristic discrepancy between fibrinogen activity and the immunologic fibrinogen. In one patient, the dysfibrinogenemia was confirmed by molecular analysis; in the other case, the diagnosis was presumptive based upon laboratory studies. Both patients underwent elective surgery. Both received a highly purified fibrinogen concentrate preoperatively and demonstrated a suboptimal laboratory response to the infusion. Three methods for determining fibrinogen concentration (Clauss fibrinogen, prothrombin-derived fibrinogen, and the viscoelastic functional fibrinogen) were utilized in the case of one patient, and these techniques showed discrepant results with the classic Clauss method giving the lowest concentration. Neither patient experienced excessive bleeding during surgery. Although these discrepancies have been previously described in untreated patients, their manifestation after infusion of purified fibrinogen is less well appreciated.

Clots in unusual places: lots of stress, limited data, critical decisions.

Although much less common than deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities or lungs, clots in unusual locations, including the splanchnic, cerebral, retinal, upper-extremity, and renal locations, present with significant morbidity and mortality. In the last 2 decades, treatment of clots in these unusual locations is primarily managed medically, with interventional and surgical approaches reserved for more severe or refractory cases. The hematologist is well positioned to provide consultation to organ-specific specialties (ie, neurosurgery, hepatology, ophthalmology), especially because acquired and congenital hypercoagulability plays a major role, and anticoagulation is often the primary treatment. Historically, treatment has been based on expert opinion, but systematic reviews and meta-analyses have recently been published. Various societies have produced guidelines for the treatment of clots in unusual locations; however, randomized clinical trial data remain scarce. In the last few years, increasing data have emerged concerning the efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulants in treating clots in unusual locations. Cases have recently been described highlighting atypical thrombosis associated with COVID-19 infection as well as with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) vaccine and Johnson and Johnson's Janssen Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. This article reviews clots in unusual locations with an emphasis on the splanchnic (mesenteric, portal, splenic, hepatic) and cerebral circulation. Through a case-based approach, key questions are posed, and data are presented to help guide diagnosis and treatment.

Evidence-Based Minireview: Should warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant be used in patients presenting with thrombosis in the splanchnic or cerebral veins?

Case 1: A 23-year-old female third-year medical student who has no medical history seeks treatment for abdominal distention. She takes an estrogen-containing birth control pill and does not smoke or consume alcohol. Family history is unremarkable. Physical examination is significant for abdominal distention, and an abdominal fluid wave is detected. Complete blood count is normal. Imaging confirms occlusive thrombosis of the main portal vein. On endoscopy, grade 1 to 2 esophageal varices are noted and banded. Unfractionated heparin is begun. Subsequent workup reveals a homozygous factor V Leiden mutation. Long-term anticoagulation is planned, and she asks if warfarin can be avoided given her hectic ward rotations, erratic diet, and need for monitoring. Case 2: A 35-year-old woman who has no medical history seeks treatment for progressively worsening posterior headaches for 1 week. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain shows dural sinus thrombosis with associated small areas of petechial cerebral hemorrhage. She is started on a continuous unfractionated heparin infusion and admitted to the hospital for further observation. Her grandmother is on warfarin for atrial fibrillation, and the patient would prefer to avoid warfarin because she does not think she can comply with the frequent monitoring that will be required. She inquires about other oral anticoagulant options for her condition.

Successful Long-term Anticoagulation with Enoxaparin in a Patient with a Mechanical Heart Valve.

Thromboembolism related to a mechanical heart valve (MHV) is a major complication after surgical valve replacement. Warfarin remains as guideline-endorsed thromboprophylaxis in patients with MHVs. Alternative anticoagulation therapy for patients who do not tolerate or who fail warfarin is not adequately covered in the current guidelines. We report a case of successful long-term anticoagulation with enoxaparin in a patient with a mechanical aortic valve who had a contraindication to warfarin. The patient developed a left thigh hematoma requiring surgical evacuation 1 month after initiation of weight-based dosing of enoxaparin. His dose was then titrated based on peak anti-factor Xa levels (goal 0.6-1.0 IU/ml). He remained free of signs and symptoms of thromboembolic events, valve dysfunction, bleeding complications, or major adverse effects from long-term enoxaparin use for the next 13 years. Our case provides promising evidence of the potential role of enoxaparin in patients with MHVs in whom warfarin thromboprophylaxis is not possible. Meticulous monitoring of anti-factor Xa levels and dosage adjustments are crucial to treatment success.

Heterogeneous mutational profile and prognosis conferred by TP53 mutations in appendiceal mucinous neoplasms.

The eighth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) advocates a 3-tier grading system for appendiceal mucinous tumors. The mutational profile for each tumor grade and the impact of TP53 mutation on survival are unknown. We classified appendiceal mucinous tumors into 3 grades based on the eighth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer: 21 G1 low-grade mucinous neoplasms, 21 G2 appendiceal adenocarcinomas, and 26 G3 signet ring cell carcinomas. Mutation profiles were obtained using next-generation sequencing. The impact of TP53 on prognosis was investigated by multivariable analysis. Most G1 tumors harbor KRAS/GNAS mutations with TP53 and SMAD4 in a small subset of cases. G2 and G3 tumors show a more complex mutation pattern carrying PIK3CA, BRAF, or TP53 mutations in addition to KRAS/GNAS. PTEN mutations were detected exclusively in G2 tumors. The prevalence of KRAS and GNAS mutations is significantly lower in G3 tumors relative to G1/G2, whereas TP53, PIK3CA, or BRAF mutations are common. Mutations in NRAS, IDH2, CDH1, RB1, CTNNB1, CDKN2A, PTPN11, and KIT genes were observed in single cases. Patients with TP53-mutated disseminated G2 and G3 tumors had worse progression-free survival than did those with wild-type TP53 tumors (P = .0315). A trend toward worse overall survival was observed in TP53-mutated G3 tumors (P = .102). p53 expression correlated with mutation status. We demonstrate a distinct but overlapping pattern of gene mutations in each grade of appendiceal mucinous tumors and the independent impact of TP53 mutation on progression-free survival but not overall survival.