Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Plant Dis ; 99(1): 160, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30699768

RESUMO

During September 2012, Phomopsis stem canker was observed on sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.) in a production field during seed filling with an average incidence of 15% in Morden, Manitoba (approximately 49°11'N and 98°09'W). The infected plants had elongated, brown-black lesions surrounding the leaf petiole, with numerous pycnidia, pith damage, and mid-stem lodging. Twenty sunflower plants were randomly sampled from the field. Isolations were made from the margins of the necrotic stems lesions by plating small pieces (5 mm) on potato dextrose agar (PDA) amended with 0.02% streptomycin sulfate. Plates were incubated at 25°C for 14 days under a 12-h photoperiod, and hyphal tips of white to grey colonies were transferred to PDA. Five isolates producing black pycnidia (occasionally with ostiolate beaks) and alpha conidia were tentatively identified as a Diaporthe sp. Alpha conidia were ellipsoidal, hyaline, and 6.5 to 8.5 × 2.5 to 3.5 µm. DNA was extracted from the mycelium of five isolates, and the ITS region was amplified and sequenced using primers ITS5 and ITS4 (4). BLASTn analysis of the 600-bp fragment (GenBank Accession Nos. KM391960 to KM391964) showed that the best match was Phomopsis sp. AJY-2011a strain T12505G (Diaporthe gulyae R.G. Shivas, S.M. Thompson & A.J. Young [3], Accession No. JF431299) from H. annuus with identities = 540/540 (100%) and gaps = 0/540 (0%). The five D. gulyae isolates were tested for pathogenicity on a sunflower confection inbred cv. HA 288 using the stem-wound method (2). Four-week-old sunflower plants (10 plants per isolate) were inoculated by wounding the stems on the second internode with a micropipette tip and placing a Diaporthe-infested mycelial plug on the wound. All plugs were attached to the wound with Parafilm. The pots were placed on the greenhouse benches at 25°C under a 16-h light/dark cycle. At 3 days after inoculation, dark brown lesions were observed on the stems extending upward from the inoculation site. Stem and leaves wilted, causing plant death 14 days after inoculation. Disease severity was calculated as a percentage of stem lesion (lesion length/stem length × 100%) at 14 days after inoculation. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) in disease severity were observed among D. gulyae isolates, which ranged from 34.9 to 100.0% (n = 5). Ten control plants similarly treated with sterile PDA plugs did not display symptoms. To complete Koch's postulates, D. gulyae was re-isolated from the inoculated stems, and the pathogen's identity was confirmed via sequencing of the ITS regions using primers ITS5 and ITS4 (4). The pathogen was not isolated from the control plants. D. gulyae was first reported as a pathogen on H. annuus in Australia and United States in 2011 (1,3). The pathogen was determined to be as or more aggressive than the other causal agents of Phomopsis stem canker (2,3), and its identification in both countries was circumstantially associated with increased incidence and yield loss in commercial production fields (1,3). In Canada, Phomopsis stem canker has been observed in sunflower fields over the last 10 years at low incidences, especially in years with above-normal temperatures during the sunflower growing season; however, the causal agent was not confirmed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of D. gulyae causing Phomopsis stem canker on sunflowers in Canada. Since there is currently no known resistance to D. gulyae in sunflower, this newly discovered pathogen may become a threat to sunflower production in Canada. References: (1) F. Mathew et al. Phytopathology 101:S115, 2011. (2) F. Mathew et al. Phytopathology 103:S2.91, 2013. (3) S. M. Thompson et al. Persoonia 27:80, 2011. (4) T. J. White et al. Page 315 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. M. A. Innis et al., eds. Academic Press, San Diego, 1990.

2.
Plant Dis ; 96(5): 666-672, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30727512

RESUMO

Acreage of dry field pea (Pisum sativum) in North Dakota has increased approximately eightfold from the late 1990s to the late 2000s to over 200,000 ha annually. A coincidental increase in losses to root rots has also been observed. Root rot in dry field pea is commonly caused by a complex of pathogens which included Fusarium spp. and Rhizoctonia solani. R. solani isolates were obtained from roots sampled at the three- to five-node growth stage from North Dakota pea fields and from symptomatic samples received at the Plant Diagnostic Lab at North Dakota State University in 2008 and 2009. Using Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA), 17 R. solani pea isolates were determined to belong to anastomosis group (AG)-4 homogenous group (HG)-II and two isolates to AG-5. Pathogenicity of select pea isolates was determined on field pea and two rotation hosts, soybean and dry bean. All isolates caused disease on all hosts; however, the median disease ratings were higher on green pea, dry bean, and soybean cultivars when inoculated with pea isolate AG-4 HG-II. Identification of R. solani AGs and subgroups on field pea and determination of relative pathogenicity on rotational hosts is important for effective resistance breeding and appropriate rotation strategies.

3.
Plant Dis ; 94(6): 789, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30754333

RESUMO

Tan lesions approximately 1.7 × 0.8 cm with distinct dark brown margins and small pycnidia were observed on leaves of field peas (Pisum sativum L. 'Agassiz') growing in Campbell County, South Dakota (45°45.62'N, 100°9.13'W) in July 2008. Small pieces of symptomatic leaves were surface sterilized (10% NaOCl for 1 min, 70% EtOH for 1 min, and sterile distilled H2O for 2 min) and placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) for 7 days under fluorescent lights with a 12-h photoperiod to induce sporulation. A pure culture was established by streaking a conidial suspension on PDA and isolating a single germinated spore 3 days later. The culture was grown on clarified V8 media for 10 days. Conidia were 10 to 16 × 3 to 4.5 µm and uniseptate with a slightly constricted septum, similar to those of Ascochyta pisi Lib. The exuding spore mass from pycnidia growing on the medium was carrot red. No chlamydospores or pseudothecia were observed (1,2). To confirm the identity of A. pisi, DNA was extracted from the lyophilized mycelium of the 10-day-old culture with the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions I and II were amplified with PCR primers ITS 5 and ITS 4 (3). PCR amplicons were cleaned and directly sequenced in both directions using the primers. A BLASTN search against the NCBI nonredundant nucleotide database was performed using the consensus sequence generated by alignment of the forward and reverse sequences for this region. The consensus sequence (GenBank Accession No. GU722316) most closely matched A. pisi var. pisi strain (GenBank Accession No. EU167557). These observations confirm the identity of the fungus as A. pisi. A suspension of 1 × 106 conidia/ml of the isolate was spray inoculated to runoff on 10 replicate plants of 2-week-old, susceptible green field pea 'Sterling'. Plants were incubated in a dew chamber for 48 h at 18°C and moved to the greenhouse bench where they were maintained at 20 to 25°C with a 12-h photoperiod for 1 week. Tan lesions with dark margins appeared 7 days after inoculation and disease was assessed after 10 days (4). No symptoms were observed on water-treated control plants. A. pisi was reisolated from lesions and confirmed by DNA sequencing of the ITS region, fulfilling Koch's postulates. Currently, states bordering South Dakota (North Dakota and Montana) lead the United States in field pea production. Although acreage is limited in South Dakota, the identification of A. pisi in this region is serious. The disease is yield limiting and foliar fungicides are used for disease management (1). To our knowledge, this is the first report of Ascochyta blight on P. sativum caused by A. pisi occurring in South Dakota and the MonDak production region (the Dakotas and Montana). References: (1) T. W. Bretag et al. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 57:88, 2006. (2) A. S. Lawyer. Page 11 in: The Compendium of Pea Diseases. D. J. Hagedorn, ed. The American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, 1984. (3) T. J. White et al. Page 315 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. M. A. Innis et al., eds. Academic Press, San Diego, 1990. (4) J. M. Wroth. Can. J. Bot. 76:1955, 1998.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...