Return to Work and Driving After Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) has demonstrated improved patient-reported outcome measures. Less evidence has been reported on how frequently patients return to complex activities of daily living. Our purposes were to investigate (1) hospital lengths of stay (LOSs) (2) discharge dispositions and (3) the rates and postoperative time intervals at which patients returned to driving and working. Methods: A total of 50 RATKA patients who were employed prior to surgery were included. Outcomes included hospital LOS, discharge dispositions, return to driving, and return to work. Results: A total of 48 patients (96%) were discharged home with self-care or health aid discharge after a mean LOS of 1.2 ± 0.6 days. Twelve patients (24%) returned to driving within 3 weeks of surgery. In our study, 100% of patients who underwent RATKA returned to driving after a mean of 29 days (range, 4 to 62 days). Forty-five patients (90%) returned to their preoperative level of work after a mean of 46 days (range, 2 to 96 days). Nineteen patients (38%) returned to work within 3 weeks. Conclusions: This study showed fast recovery after RATKA, with >90% returning to driving and working at full capacity within 2 months. Many (38%) returned to work within 3 weeks. Further studies to demonstrate the value of RATKA with respect to recovery of complex activities are needed. Compared to controls from previously published literature on manual total knee arthroplasties, it appears that patients who undergo RATKA have similar or better outcomes in reference to return to driving.

Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis Following Operative Fixation of Acetabular Fractures: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-recognized complication following operative fixation of acetabular fractures with a range of severity and clinical consequences. The purpose of this review was to: (1) report the incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) formation following operative fixation of acetabular fractures; (2) determine the effectiveness of prophylactic treatments for HO; and (3) assess the radiographic severity of HO with and without prophylactic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search for peer-reviewed articles was conducted utilizing a variety of research databases. PRISMA guidelines were followed and included in this review were full-length, English language manuscripts published before September 2019, using the following search criteria: "heterotopic ossification AND acetabulum OR acetabular." Studies that reported HO as one of the reported outcomes were included. Articles were excluded if radiographic HO was not reported and if it was evaluated in surgeries other than those involved in acetabular fractures. Extracted data included, but was not limited to: type of prophylaxis; incidence of HO; severity of HO based on the Brooker classification; and statistical significance. A methodologic quality appraisal of the included studies was also conducted. A total of 54 full-text studies with 5,890 patients with operatively fixed acetabular fractures met inclusion criteria. There were four level I studies, four level II study, 26 level III studies, and 20 level IV studies. RESULTS: The overall incidence of HO after acetabular fracture surgery was 28.4%. The rate of HO formation was: 34.9% without prophylaxis, 28.3% with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) prophylaxis, and 21.2% with radiation therapy (RT). Patients receiving a combination of both RT and NSAIDs developed HO 21.8% of the time. The rate of radiographic severe HO was 13.9% (range, 0-75%) in patients without prophylaxis, 9.4% (range, 0-50%) with NSAID prophylaxis, 5.7% (range, 0-12.8%) with RT prophylaxis, and 11.7% (range, 0-18.5%) with the combination of RT and NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: With the current literature collected in this systematic review, there was a lower incidence and severity of heterotopic bone formation following acetabular fracture fixation using radiation prophylaxis compared to NSAIDs or no treatment. The available literature is heterogeneous in fracture characteristics, surgical approaches, and prophylactic regimens with a general lack of randomized control trials. Further prospective studies are required to make definitive claims on the optimal prophylactic strategy to prevent heterotopic ossification.

Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty for a High-Volume Surgeon.

The learning curve has been established for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) during the first month of use; however, there have been no studies evaluating this on a longer term. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare operative times for three cohorts during the first year following adoption of RATKA (initial, 6 months, and 1 year) and a prior cohort of manual TKA. We investigated both mean operative times and the variability of operative time in each cohort. This is a learning curve study comparing a single surgeon's experience using RAKTA. The study groups were made up of two cohorts of 60 cementless RATKAs performed at ∼6 months and 1 year of use. A learning curve was created based on the mean operative times and individual operative times were stratified into different cohorts for comparison. Study groups were compared with the surgeon's initial group of 20 cemented RATKAs and 60 cementless manual cases. Descriptive numbers were compiled and mean operative times were compared using Student's t-tests for significant differences with a p-value of < 0.05. The mean surgical times continued to decrease after 6 months of RATKA. In 1 year, the surgeon was performing 88% of the RATKA between 50 and 69 minutes. The initial cohort and 1-year robotic-assisted mean operative times were 81 and 62 minutes, respectively (p < 0.00001). Mean 6-month robotic-assisted operative times were similar to manual times (p = 0.12). A significant lower time was found between the mean operative times for the 1-year robotic-assisted and manual (p = 0.008) TKAs. The data show continued improvement of operative times at 6 months and 1 year when using this new technology. The results of this study are important because they demonstrate how the complexity of a technology which initially increases operative time can be overcome and become more time-effective than conventional techniques.

The Accuracy of Computed Tomography-Based, Three-Dimensional Implant Planning in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Advanced imaging used in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA), such as computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) planning, may provide an accurate means of implant sizing preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to examine preoperative CT-based implant planning accuracy for robotic-assisted TKA in patients who have (1) varus deformities, (2) valgus deformities, (3) neutral alignment, and (4) retained hardware. A total of 393 patients underwent a robotic-assisted TKA by a single surgeon received preoperative CT scans. The surgeon reviewed the CT-based model preoperatively and recorded the expected size of the components. The final implants used in each case were recorded and compared with the surgeon's preoperative plan. In all groups of patients, the surgeon's CT-based implant plan was within one size of the implant utilized 100% of the time for both the tibiae and femora. Overall, the surgeon was exactly matched in 319 (81%) and 315 (80%) cases for the femoral and tibial components, respectively. For the femoral component, the mean age for patients in whom the original plan was exactly matched was younger than those whose implants were upsized and older than patients those implants were downsized (p = 0.024). Other patient demographics and preoperative knee alignment were not associated with predictive accuracy for femoral or tibial components. Our results demonstrate how preoperative CT-based, 3D planning for robotic-assisted TKA is accurate to within one size of the components in every case (100%), and exactly matched in 80%. The results of this study are important because they demonstrate how CT-based preoperative implant planning for TKA is reliable and accurate across all native knee alignments and other patient-specific factors. In addition, they build on a previous study by the same single surgeon, demonstrating that predictive ability can improve over time. This may be important as we move toward more outpatient surgery with less ability for prostheses inventory at ambulatory sites.

Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Manual total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has successfully treated end-stage knee osteoarthritis for several years. However, recent technological advancements have enabled surgeons to perform TKA with more accuracy and precision. Aligning the femoral and tibial components perpendicular to the mechanical axes of the femur and tibia is a fundamental principle for restoring knee kinematics and soft-tissue balance. Computer-assisted robotic TKA has proven its ability to fine tune lower leg alignment, component position, and soft-tissue balancing. Furthermore, robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA) offers the additional benefit of improving soft-tissue protection compared to manual techniques. Numerous systems have been developed in the advancement of technology in computer processing, and the number of robotic surgical systems is increasing as well. The three main categories of navigation systems can be classified as: image-based console navigation, imageless console navigation, and accelerometer-based handheld navigation systems. The purpose of this review was to describe emerging technologies for TKA. Specifically, we outline the available literature pertaining to each system with regards to their: (1) accuracy and precision of component alignment; (2) soft-tissue protection; (3) postoperative outcomes; and (4) other reported outcomes such as costs.

Cementless Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Various Patient Populations: A Literature Review.

The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed in the United States has increased considerably in recent years, with a major contribution from younger patients. Maximizing survivorship of these implants has always been a point of emphasis. Early TKA designs with cementless fixation were associated with high rates of complications and implant failures. However, recent advances in cementless designs have shown excellent results. The decision to use cemented or cementless fixation for patients undergoing TKA is typically based on the surgeon's experience and preference. However, several patient characteristics must also be taken into account. The purpose of this review was to describe the clinical outcomes of studies in which a cementless TKA system was utilized for patients who (1) were less than 60 years of age, (2) were greater than 75 years of age, (3) were obese, (4) had rheumatoid arthritis, and (5) had osteonecrosis of the knee. Based on the studies included in this review, it appears that cementless fixation is a viable option for patients who have all of the above demographics.

Is Iron Deficiency Anemia a Risk Factor for Poorer Outcomes in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) commonly have concomitant iron deficiency anemia (IDA). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of IDA on (1) total in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS); (2) 90-day readmissions; (3) costs of care; (4) medical complications; and (5) and implant-related complications in patients who underwent primary TKA. METHODS: Patients with and without IDA undergoing primary TKA were identified and matched through a nationwide administrative claims database that yielded 94,053 and 470,264 patients, respectively. Primary outcomes that were statistically analyzed included in-hospital LOS, readmission rates, costs of care, medical complications, and implant-related complications. RESULTS: Patients with IDA had longer in-hospital LOS (4 days vs 3 days; P < .0001), 90-day readmission rates (25.8% vs 16.3%; odds ratio [OR], 1.77; P < .0001), higher day of surgery ($13,079.42 vs $11,758.25; P < .0001), and total global 90-day episode of care costs ($17,635.13 vs $14,439.06; P < .0001) compared to patients who do not have IDA. Furthermore, IDA patients were found to have significantly higher incidence and odds of medical (3.53% vs 1.33%; OR, 2.71; P < .0001) and implant-related (3.80% vs 2.68%; OR, 1.43; P < .0001) complications following primary TKA. CONCLUSION: The effect of IDA on TKA outcomes may make a large impact on healthcare usage. We found that patients with IDA had poorer results in all the outcomes that were measured. Orthopedic surgeons can use this information to evaluate the need for IDA interventions before TKA which may contribute to lower rates of morbidity and mortality in TKA.