The Whitnall Barrier: A Technique for the Management of Lacrimal Gland Prolapse.

BACKGROUND: The Whitnall barrier procedure, a modified Beer and Kompatscher surgical technique to reposition the lacrimal gland, is presented alongside a case series of patients demonstrating excellent aesthetic and functional outcomes. METHODS: The Whitnall barrier procedure is illustrated procedurally and accompanied by a case series of 20 consecutive patients treated in a single institution by a single surgical team between December of 2016 and February of 2020. Lid contour and function were assessed postoperatively, as was patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Thirty-seven eyes of 20 patients were included. All patients were women, with an average age of 50 years. Fourteen patients underwent surgery for cosmesis, four had inactive thyroid eye disease, and two had lacrimal gland enlargement secondary to dacryoadenitis. The degree of lacrimal gland prolapse was described as mild in two eyes and moderate in 35 eyes. All patients had one or more additional surgical procedures. Mean follow-up duration was 11 months, with complete resolution of lacrimal gland prolapse in 34 eyes. The patient who did not have complete resolution had dacryoadenitis and required ongoing immunosuppressive therapy. Two patients were discharged on topical lubricants: one with thyroid eye disease and one cosmetic patient who underwent upper and lower lid blepharoplasties at the same time. There were no intraoperative complications and no incidences of infection, dehiscence, or damage to the lacrimal gland ductules. CONCLUSIONS: The Whitnall barrier technique is a safe and effective surgical procedure to restore the anatomic location of the lacrimal gland. It provides excellent aesthetic and functional outcomes.

Defining Ocular Surface Disease Activity and Damage Indices by an International Delphi Consultation.

PURPOSE: Unifying terminology for the description of ocular surface disease (OSD) is vital for determining treatment responses and ensuring robust clinical trial outcomes. To date, there are no agreed parameters describing 'activity' and 'damage' phases of disease. METHODS: A working group of international experts in OSD, oculoplastics, and uveitis from a range of backgrounds (university, teaching, district general and private hospitals) participated in a modified Delphi consensus-building exercise (October 31, 2011 to March 20, 2015). Two steering group meetings took place in which factors based upon published literature were discussed and supplemented with anonymous web-based questionnaires to refine clinical indices according to 'activity' (reversible changes resulting directly from the inflammatory process) and/or 'damage' (persistent, >6 months duration) changes resulting from previously active disease that are cumulative and irreversible). RESULTS: The recommended set of clinical parameters for the assessment of OSD encompasses 68 clinical indices and 22 ancillary grading tools (in parenthesis) subdivided by anatomical domain as follows: 4(4) tear-film, eyelid 21(3), 17(3) conjunctiva, 15(10) cornea and 11(2) Anterior Chamber/Sclera. Of these; 17(2) were considered as measures of clinical activity, 27(3) as damage, 1(8) as measures of both activity and damage. Twenty-three clinical descriptors and 9 tools did not reach the threshold for inclusion into the main standard set. These were defined as 'second tier' parameters for use in special clinical settings. CONCLUSION: These core parameters provide the first description of 'activity' and 'damage' relevant to OSD and provide a platform for the future development of scoring scales for each parameter.

Social deprivation as a risk factor for late presentation of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether social deprivation is a risk factor for late presentation of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and whether it affects their access to urgent laser treatment. METHODS: Using a 2:1 case: control design, 102 patients referred to a UK teaching hospital as part of the UK Diabetic Retinopathy National Screening Programme were identified for the period between 1 June 2010 to 1 June 2013. Social deprivation was scored using the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010. Additional variables considered included age, duration of disease, ethnicity, and HbA1c at time of referral. RESULTS: The cases comprised 34 patients referred with proliferative (grade R3) retinopathy with a control group of 68 patients with lower retinopathy grades; two control patients were excluded due to incomplete data. On univariate analysis, R3 retinopathy was associated with higher social deprivation (P<0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test), and with higher HbA1c (11.5% vs 8.4%; P<0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test). Forward stepwise multivariable analysis showed that the association of R3 retinopathy with deprivation was significant even after adjusting for HbA1c (P=0.016). On univariate analysis South Asian ethnicity was also identified as being a risk factor for presentation with R3 retinopathy, but this was no longer significant when HbA1c was adjusted for in a forward stepwise logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: In our cohort social deprivation appears to be associated with late presentation of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Our study supports the need to target these groups to reduce preventable blindness and to identify strategies which overcome barriers to care.

The role of social deprivation in severe neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Advances in therapy have improved outcomes for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Prompt access to treatment is a priority and may be used as a key performance indicator. In this study, we investigate how social deprivation may impact on access to services, treatment and visual impairment registration. METHODS: Patients were identified retrospectively through the Certificate of Visual Impairment system for the University Hospitals Birmingham Medical Retina service. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2007 score was calculated for each patient. The impact of deprivation, age, gender and ethnicity on key stages in the care pathway was assessed. RESULTS: 120 patients were identified. Patients with greater social deprivation were under-represented, had worse visual acuity at first presentation (correlation of the better-seeing eye with IMD 0.225 (p=0.013)) and had sight-impairment registration earlier (correlation -0.246; p=0.007). Deprivation did not affect time to first appointment, and was not associated with a higher rate of non-attendance. CONCLUSIONS: The late presentation and under-representation of patients with greater social deprivation is a serious concern. Our study strongly suggests that this vulnerable group is encountering barriers in accessing treatment in nAMD, and that these occur prior to entry into the Hospital Eye Service.