Positive effects of aggressive vasodilator treatment of well-treated essential hypertensive patients.

Increased systemic vascular resistance and coronary microvascular dysfunction are well-documented in essential hypertension (EH). We investigated the effect of additional vasodilating treatment on coronary and peripheral resistance circulation in EH patients with high systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) despite well-treated blood pressure (BP). We enroled patients on stable antihypertensive treatment that were given intensified vasodilating therapy (ACE inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker or calcium channel blocker). Before and following 6 months of intensified therapy, coronary resting and maximal artery flow were measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to calculate coronary flow reserve (CFR) and minimum vascular resistance (C-Rmin). Cardiac output was estimated by inert gas rebreathing to calculate SVRI. Maximal forearm blood flow was determined by venous occlusion plethysmography to calculate minimum vascular resistance (F-Rmin). Patients were assigned into two groups: high-SVRI and low-SVRI subgroups, based on a median split at baseline. Following additional treatment SVRI decreased more in the high-SVRI group than in the low-SVRI group (14.4 vs -2.2%: P=0.003), despite similar baseline ambulatory BP (132/81 mm Hg) and BP reduction (6.5 and 4.6%: P=0.19). F-Rmin remained unchanged (6.5 vs -2.0%: P=0.30), while C-Rmin decreased by 22 and 24% (P=0.80) and CFR increased by 23 and 17% (P=0.16). Thus, intensified vasodilating therapy improved SVRI more in patients with high SVRI than in those with low SVRI. Regardless of SVRI status, the treatment improved cardiac but not forearm dilatation capacity. The substantial improvement of the hypertensive cardiac microvascular dysfunction was not related to the reduction in SVRI.

Forearm plethysmography in the assessment of vascular tone and resistance vasculature design: new methodological insights.

AIM: High peripheral resistance and structural alteration in resistance arteries are central phenomena in essential hypertension and have been widely examined by forearm venous occlusion plethysmography; at rest for studying vascular tone, and during reactive hyperaemia for studying vascular structure. This work concerns the influence of venous pressure on hyperaemic vascular resistance (Rmin), the reproducibility of hyperaemic and resting vascular resistances (Rrest) and the relation between forearm and total peripheral vascular resistance (TPR). METHODS: In four healthy subjects, intravenous and intra-arterial blood pressures were measured simultaneously with plethysmographic recordings of hyperaemic and resting forearm blood flows. Reproducibility was examined in 15 young and 14 middle-aged healthy subjects and in 21 untreated hypertensive patients. RESULTS: Rmin remained low in the first recorded cardiac cycle, but rose in the second, even though corrected for the venous pressure rise, suggesting vascular tone recovery along with venous congestion. Between-day reproducibility of Rmin was high in middle-aged normotensive (8.7%) and hypertensive subjects (10.6%), but Rmin fell significantly between successive days in the young subjects. Rrest correlated with TPR, but required up to 40 min to reach steady state and showed high day-to-day variation in young (21.8%) and hypertensive subjects (16.2%). CONCLUSIONS: During hyperaemia, vascular resistance should be measured in the first cardiac cycle following venous occlusion to minimize influences of venous pressure rise and possible tone recovery. Rrest seems to reflect TPR. About 20 subjects may be needed to detect 15% changes between days in Rrest, fewer when concerning Rmin and TPR.