RESUMO
An interactive, computerized version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) was completed by 135 randomly selected psychiatric inpatients and evaluated by the patients and their psychiatrists. The results showed that the majority of the patients interacted well with the computer and that the treating psychiatrists found the computer reports generally accurate and helpful. Analysis of the agreement between the computer and the psychiatrists' diagnoses yielded mixed results depending on the method of analysis chosen. The thoroughness, consistency, and broad perspective of the computer interview combined with the insight, creativity, and experience of the well-trained clinician may ultimately provide a method of diagnosis that is superior to either used alone.
Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Computador , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Comportamento do Consumidor , Diagnóstico por Computador/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Jersey , Psiquiatria , Papel (figurativo)RESUMO
Eleven female volunteers completed a 6-month treatment program consisting of a 2-month baseline phase, 2 months of biofeedback training (X number of sessions = 12.9), and 2 months of follow-up data collection. Subjects were assigned to one of two treatment groups: skin temperature training or EMG training of the frontalis muscle. Self-report data were gathered by means of the Symptom Severity Scale. Results, which were analyzed according to a 2 X 3 (treatment X phase) split-plot factorial design, indicate a highly significant overall treatment effect (F = 19.32 p less than .001). There was no significant difference between treatments (F = .47) and no significant interaction effect (F = 1.74).
