Does effort increase or decrease reward valuation? Considerations from cognitive dissonance theory.

The present research tested the effect of manipulated perceived control (over obtaining the outcomes) and effort on reward valuation using the event-related potential known as the Reward Positivity (RewP). This test was conducted in an attempt to integrate two research literatures with opposite findings: Effort justification occurs when high effort leads to high reward valuation, whereas effort discounting occurs when high effort leads to low reward valuation. Based on an examination of past methods used in these literatures, we predicted that perceived control and effort would interactively influence RewP. Consistent with the effort justification literature (cognitive dissonance theory), when individuals have high perceived control, high effort should lead to more reward valuation than low effort should. Consistent with the effort discounting literature, when individuals have low perceived control, low effort should lead to more reward valuation than high effort should. Results supported these interactive and integrative predictions.

Longitudinal volumetric changes in amygdala subregions in frontotemporal dementia.

Amygdala atrophy has been found in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), yet the specific changes of its subregions across different FTD phenotypes remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the volumetric alterations of the amygdala subregions in FTD phenotypes and how they evolve with disease progression. Patients clinically diagnosed with behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD) (n = 20), semantic dementia (SD) (n = 20), primary nonfluent aphasia (PNFA) (n = 20), Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n = 20), and 20 matched healthy controls underwent whole brain structural MRI. The patient groups were followed up annually for up to 3.5 years. Amygdala nuclei were segmented using FreeSurfer, corrected by total intracranial volumes, and grouped into the basolateral, superficial, and centromedial subregions. Linear mixed effects models were applied to identify changes in amygdala subregional volumes over time. At baseline, bvFTD, SD, and AD displayed global amygdala volume reduction, whereas amygdala volume appeared to be preserved in PNFA. Asymmetrical amygdala atrophy (left > right) was most pronounced in SD. Longitudinally, SD and PNFA showed greater rates of annual decline in the right basolateral and superficial subregions compared to bvFTD and AD. The findings provide comprehensive insights into the differential impact of FTD pathology on amygdala subregions, revealing distinct atrophy patterns that evolve over disease progression. The characterization of amygdala subregional involvement in FTD and their potential role as biomarkers carry substantial clinical implications.

Rationale and Design of the "DIagnostic and Prognostic Precision Algorithm for behavioral variant Frontotemporal Dementia" (DIPPA-FTD) Study: A Study Aiming to Distinguish Early Stage Sporadic FTD from Late-Onset Primary Psychiatric Disorders.

BACKGROUND: The behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is very heterogeneous in pathology, genetics, and disease course. Unlike Alzheimer's disease, reliable biomarkers are lacking and sporadic bvFTD is often misdiagnosed as a primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) due to overlapping clinical features. Current efforts to characterize and improve diagnostics are centered on the minority of genetic cases. OBJECTIVE: The multi-center study DIPPA-FTD aims to develop diagnostic and prognostic algorithms to help distinguish sporadic bvFTD from late-onset PPD in its earliest stages. METHODS: The prospective DIPPA-FTD study recruits participants with late-life behavioral changes, suspect for bvFTD or late-onset PPD diagnosis with a negative family history for FTD and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Subjects are invited to participate after diagnostic screening at participating memory clinics or recruited by referrals from psychiatric departments. At baseline visit, participants undergo neurological and psychiatric examination, questionnaires, neuropsychological tests, and brain imaging. Blood is obtained to investigate biomarkers. Patients are informed about brain donation programs. Follow-up takes place 10-14 months after baseline visit where all examinations are repeated. Results from the DIPPA-FTD study will be integrated in a data-driven approach to develop diagnostic and prognostic models. CONCLUSIONS: DIPPA-FTD will make an important contribution to early sporadic bvFTD identification. By recruiting subjects with ambiguous or prodromal diagnoses, our research strategy will allow the characterization of early disease stages that are not covered in current sporadic FTD research. Results will hopefully increase the ability to diagnose sporadic bvFTD in the early stage and predict progression rate, which is pivotal for patient stratification and trial design.