RESUMO
The antimicrobial activity and microenvironmental safety of poly- and oligoguanidine antiseptics were compared. E. coli and St. aureus test strains were found to be more sensitive to chlorohexidine bigluconate (CHB) upon a long (24 hour) exposure and to polyhexamethylene guanidine derivatives on short (30-second) contact. It is concluded that unlike polyguanidine antiseptics, CHB is more ecologically dangerous; when used for rapid disinfection, it can provoke impairment in the microenvironmental balance outside the area of application. The findings show it expedient to assess the microenvironmental safety of antimicrobial agents in order to prevent ecological catastrophes.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/efeitos adversos , Poluição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Guanidina/efeitos adversos , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , HumanosRESUMO
The article contains the results of comparison of the methods of evaluation of the microbiological danger of antimicrobial agents by the example of oligo- and polyguanidines. The study demonstrates that choice of an adequate study model (a bacterial or protozoa species) and exposure time depends on the characteristics of the preparation to be tested. It shows that the microbocide activity of polyguanidines should be studied on a bacterial model using long (24 hours) exposure. The most sensitive to XG6 was a protozoa culture in short-time exposure. To evaluate the biological danger ofantimicrobial agents, it is also possible to apply techniques that allow revealing reversable physiological changes in a culture of test objects.