Incidence, Survival Analysis and Future Perspective of Primary Peritoneal Mesothelioma (PPM): A Population-Based Study from SEER Database.

BACKGROUND: Primary peritoneal mesothelioma (PPM) is a rare and aggressive tumor arising from the visceral and parietal peritoneum. The diagnosis and treatment of PPM are often delayed because of non-specific clinical presentation, and the prognosis is worse. The current study investigated the demographic, clinical, and pathological factors affecting patient prognosis and survival in PPM. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data of 1998 patients with PPM were extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1975-2016). The chi-square test, paired t-test, and multivariate analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The majority of PPM patients were male (56.2%, p < 0.005) and Caucasian (90.4%, p < 0.005, with a mean age of diagnosis was 69 ± 13 years. The grading, histological, and tumor size information were classified as "Unknown" in most of the cases, but when available, poorly differentiated tumors (8.7%), malignant mesothelioma, not otherwise specified (63.4%) and tumors > 4 cm in size (8%), respectively, were most common, p < 0.005. Chemotherapy was administered to 50.6% of patients, followed by resection (29.2%) and radiation (1.5%), p < 0.001. The cohort of PPM had a five-year overall survival of 20.3% (±1.1), compared to 43.5% (±5.9), 25.9% (± 8.4), and 18.7% (±1.6) for those with surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy alone, respectively. Poor differentiation (OR = 4.2, CI = 3.3-4.9), tumor size > 4 cm (OR = 3.9, CI = 3.2-4.5), Caucasian race (OR = 2.9, CI = 2.6-4.4), and distant SEER stage (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.1-3.2) were all linked with increased mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An extremely rare and aggressive peritoneal tumor, PPM may be difficult to identify at the time of diagnosis. Radiation therapy likely to have a limited function in the treatment of this condition, with surgery and chemotherapy being the primary choices. All PPM patients should be enrolled in a nationwide registry to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and identify factors affecting survival.

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review.

The prognosis of cutaneous melanoma (CM) is based on the histological characteristics of the primary tumor, such as Breslow depth, ulceration, and mitotic rate. The lymph node ratio (LNR) is the ratio of the involved lymph nodes (LNs) divided by the total number of LNs removed during regional LN dissection. LNR is a prognostic factor for many solid tumors; however, controversies exist regarding CM. This study sought to analyze the role of LNR as a prognostic factor in CM. An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials from January 1966 to July 2015. The keywords included in the search were CM and inclusion of the ratio of positive to the total number of LNs as a prognostic factor. The outcomes analyzed included the number of patients with positive LNs, type of survival analysis, and results from the multivariate analysis. A total of 11 studies involving 12,011 patients with positive LNs were evaluated. No previous randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, or systematic reviews were identified in the Cochrane database on the prognostic value of LNR in CM. The primary electronic database search resulted in 333 full-text articles. The LN location examined was the cervical, axillary, and inguinal regions in all studies except for one that examined only the inguinal region. All studies except three studied the prognostic value of the LNR as a categorical variable rather than a continuous variable. LNR was categorized as A (≤0.1), B (0.11-0.25), and C (>0.25). All studies identified LNR as an independent predictor of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or disease-specific survival (DSS). The hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval (CI) associated with either DFS or OS were available only in a few studies. Moreover, pooled HR for OS was 2.08 (95% CI: 1.48 2.92), for DFS was 1.364 (95% CI: 0.92-2.02), and for DSS was 1.643 (95% CI: 0.89-3.0). The LNR provides superior prognostic stratification among patients with CM. Additional adequately powered prospective studies are needed to further define the role of LNR and be included in the staging system of CM and direct adjuvant therapy.

Klatskin Tumor in the Light of ICD-O-3: A Population-Based Clinical Outcome Study Involving 1,144 Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) Database (2001-2012).

Introduction Klatskin tumors (KTs) occur at the confluence of the right and left extrahepatic ducts and are classified based on their anatomical and histological codes in the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O). The second edition of the ICD-O (ICD-O-2) allocated a distinctive histological code to KT, which also included intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC). This unclear coding may result in ambiguous reporting of the demographic and clinical features of KT. The current study aimed to investigate the demographic, clinical, and pathological factors affecting the prognosis and survival of KT in the light of the updated third edition of ICD-O, Ninth Revision (ICD-O-3). Methods Data of 1,144 patients with KT from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database (2001-2012) were extracted. Patients with KT were analyzed for age, sex, race, stage, treatment, and long-term survival. The data were analyzed using chi-square tests, t-tests, and univariate and multivariate analyses. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare long-term survival between KT and subgroups of all biliary CCs. Results Of all biliary CCs, KT comprised 9.35%, with a mean age of diagnosis of 73±13 years, and was more common in men (54.8%) and Caucasian patients (69.5%). Histologically, moderately differentiated tumors were the most common (38.9%) followed by poorly differentiated (35.7%), well-differentiated (23.3%), and undifferentiated tumors (2.2%) (p<0.001). Most tumors in the KT group were 2-4 cm in size (41.5%), while fewer were >4 cm (29.7%) and <2 cm (28.8%) (p<0.001). ICD-O-3 defined most KTs in extrahepatic location (53.5%), while the remainder were in other biliary locations (46.5%) (p<0.001). Most KT patients received no treatment (73%), and for those who were treated, the most frequent modality was radiation (52.7%), followed by surgery (28.1%), and both surgery and radiation (19.2%) (p<0.001). Mean survival time for KT patients treated with surgery was inferior to all CCs of the biliary tree (1.72±2.61 vs. 1.87±2.18 years) (p=0.047). Multivariate analysis identified regional metastasis (OR=2.8; 95% CI=2.6-3.0), distant metastasis (OR=2.1; 95% CI=1.9-2.4), lymph node positivity (OR=1.6; 95% CI=1.4-1.8), Caucasian race (OR=2.0; 95% CI=1.8-2.2), and male sex (OR=1.2; 95% CI=1.1-1.3) were independently associated with increased mortality for KT (p<0.001). Conclusion The ICD-O-3 has permitted a greater understanding of KT. KT is a rare and lethal biliary malignancy that presents most often in Caucasian men in their seventh decade of life with moderately differentiated histology. Surgical resection does not provide any survival advantage compared to similarly treated biliary CCs. In addition, the combination of surgery and radiation appeared to provide no added survival benefits compared to other treatment modalities for KT.

Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), defined as ischemic rest pain or tissue loss secondary to arterial insufficiency, is caused by multilevel arterial disease with frequent, severe infrageniculate disease. The rise in CLTI is in part the result of increasing worldwide prevalence of diabetes, renal insufficiency, and advanced aging of the population. The aim of this study was to compare a bypass-first with an endovascular-first revascularization strategy in patients with CLTI due to infrageniculate arterial disease. METHODS: We reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted lower extremity revascularization database from 2012 to 2015 to identify patients with CLTI and isolated infrageniculate arterial disease who underwent primary infrageniculate bypass or endovascular intervention. We excluded patients with a history of ipsilateral revascularization and proximal interventions. The end points were major adverse limb event (MALE), major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), amputation at 30 days, reintervention, patency, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association of a bypass-first or an endovascular-first intervention with outcomes. RESULTS: There were 1355 CLTI patients undergoing first-time revascularization to the infrageniculate arteries (821 endovascular-first revascularizations and 534 bypass-first revascularizations) identified. There was no significant difference in adjusted rate of 30-day MALE in the bypass-first vs endovascular-first revascularization cohort (9% vs 11.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.08). However, the incidence of transtibial or proximal amputation was lower in the bypass-first cohort (4.3% vs 7.4%; OR, 0.60; CI, 0.36-0.98). Patients with bypass-first revascularization had higher wound complication rates (9.7% vs 3.7%; OR, 2.75; CI, 1.71-4.42) compared with patients in the endovascular-first cohort. Compared with the endovascular-first cohort, the incidence of 30-day MACE was significantly higher in bypass-first patients (6.9% vs 2.6%; adjusted OR, 3.88; CI, 2.18-6.88), and 30-day mortality rates were 3.23% vs 1.8% (adjusted OR, 2.77; CI, 1.26-6.11). There was no difference in 30-day untreated loss of patency, reintervention of treated arterial segment, readmissions, and reoperations between the two cohorts. In subgroup analysis after exclusion of dialysis patients, there was also no significant difference in MALE or amputation between the bypass-first and endovascular-first cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: CLTI patients with isolated infrageniculate arterial disease treated by a bypass-first approach have a significantly lower 30-day amputation. However, this benefit was not observed when dialysis patients were excluded. The bypass-first cohort had a higher incidence of MACE compared with an endovascular-first strategy. These results reaffirm the need for randomized controlled trials, such as the Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL-2) trial and Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI), to provide level 1 evidence for the role of endovascular-first vs bypass-first revascularization strategies in the treatment of this population of challenging patients.

Comparison of surgical incision complete closure versus leaving skin open in wound class IV in emergent colon surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to compare the effect of techniques of wound closure in the emergent colon surgery with wound class IV. METHODS: Using 2014 the colectomy targeted ACS-NSQIP dataset; we identified patients undergoing emergent colectomy with wound class IV. Comparison of surgical incision complete closure versus leaving the skin open and multivariate logistic regression analyses was performed. RESULTS: Of 1792 patients undergoing emergent colectomy with wound class IV, the complete closure cohort had 1376 patients and the incision skin open cohort had 416 patients. The incidence of deep SSI was 2.3% in the complete closure cohort vs. 1.2% in the incision skin open, p = 0.15, and intra-abdominal abscess rate was 11.8% in the complete closure cohort vs. 12.3% in the incision skin open, p = 0.78. The dehiscence rate, readmission rate, and reoperation rates were not statistically significant between two cohorts. A multivariate model for dehiscence did not yield significant association between the complete closure cohort and incision skin open cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical incision complete wound closure in the emergent colon surgery with wound class III/IV is safe and effective.

Lower Extremity Ischemia after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Treatment reality of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is changing. Up to date, approximately 65% of intact AAA and 30% of ruptured AAA are treated endovascularly. As most comparative studies focus upon mortality and few major complications, some outcomes as lower extremity ischemia (LEI) after invasive AAA repair are often underreported. However, there is evidence for a worse outcome of patients suffering from this kind of complication. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) vascular surgery targeted module from 2011 to 2014, we identified all patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and open aortic repair (OAR) for AAA to illuminate the incidence and outcome of LEI after AAA repair. RESULTS: In total, 185 patients (1.9%) developed LEI after AAA repair. 1.6% of all patients showed LEI after treatment of asymptomatic or symptomatic intact AAA, compared with 4.8% of ruptured AAA repair (P < 0.001). Operation time, male gender, current smoking, and increased creatinine levels (>1.5 mg/dL) were associated with an increased likelihood of exhibiting LEI. No statistically significant differences between EVAR versus OAR were noted in the multivariate model. If LEI occurred, length of hospital stay (6 vs. 2 days, P < 0.001) and mortality (20.5 vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001) was significantly higher as compared with the patients without LEI. Furthermore, 30-day mortality and most major complications were more common if LEI occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this specialized analysis regarding LEI after AAA repair up to 2% develop this severe ischemic complication. Since the occurrence of LEI is associated with significantly worse outcome, future research and strategies to avoid this complication is needed.

Directed postgraduate study result in quantitative improvement in American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam scores.

BACKGROUND: The collective study habits of 1 group of residents involved in educationally distinct periods of time in a community-based general surgery residency program were evaluated. METHODS: American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam (ABSITE) score results of 31 residents were calculated during 3 distinctive educational time periods: resident independent, self-directed study; resident-directed study with weekly systematic textbook reviews; and faculty-directed study with additional formal basic science and clinical lectures. RESULTS: Aggregate higher scores were observed when ABSITE results for the directed study period were compared with those observed during the independent study period in mid-level resident years (postgraduate year [PGY] 2 to 4). CONCLUSIONS: With limited faculty resources, community-based surgery residency programs have more challenges in opportunities for resident acquisition of cognitive knowledge and subsequent quantitative improvement in ABSITE scores. This study demonstrated a successful methodology particularly in the face of mandated limitation of weekly resident work hours and diminishing allocated education resources.

Safety of mediastinoscopy in anatomical variations of the mediastinum: the situs inversus syndrome.

Mediastinoscopy has been widely used by thoracic surgeons to evaluate the superior mediastinum since 1959. Large series of mediastinoscopy have been reported with very low morbidity and no mortality. Proper attention to surgical techniques and mediastinal anatomy are essential to maintain the safety of the procedure. Situs inversus totalis is exceedingly rare, but variations in mediastinal anatomy in this group of patients can render the procedure challenging for the thoracic surgeon. A case of mediastinoscopy in a situs inversus patient is presented with emphasis on anatomical variations of the mediastinum and technical pitfalls of the procedure in this rare group.