Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Ann Emerg Med ; 75(1): 93-99, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31561998

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We identify factors associated with delayed emergency department (ED) antibiotics and determine feasibility of a 1-hour-from-triage antibiotic requirement in sepsis. METHODS: We studied all ED adult septic patients in accordance with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock National Quality Measures in 2 consecutive 12-month intervals. During the second interval, a quality improvement intervention was conducted: a sepsis screening protocol plus case-specific feedback to clinicians. Data were abstracted retrospectively through electronic query and chart review. Primary outcomes were antibiotic delay greater than 3 hours from documented onset of hypoperfusion (per Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock National Quality Measures) and antibiotic delay greater than 1 hour from triage (per 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations). RESULTS: We identified 297 and 357 septic patients before and during the quality improvement intervention, respectively. Before and during quality improvement intervention, antibiotic delay in accordance with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services measures occurred in 30% and 21% of cases (-9% [95% confidence interval -16% to -2%]); and in accordance with 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations, 85% and 71% (-14% [95% confidence interval -20% to -8%]). Four factors were independently associated with both definitions of antibiotic delay: vague (ie, nonexplicitly infectious) presenting symptoms, triage location to nonacute areas, care before the quality improvement intervention, and lower Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment scores. Most patients did not receive antibiotics within 1 hour of triage, with the exception of a small subset post-quality improvement intervention who presented with explicit infectious symptoms and triage hypotension. CONCLUSION: The quality improvement intervention significantly reduced antibiotic delays, yet most septic patients did not receive antibiotics within 1 hour of triage. Compliance with the 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign would require a wholesale alteration in the management of ED patients with either vague symptoms or absence of triage hypotension.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Triagem/métodos , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tempo para o Tratamento
2.
J Perinatol ; 38(8): 1124, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30046177

RESUMO

The previously published version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 1 where the "HR low" and "HR high" labels were swapped.Furthermore, in Table 1 of this Article, the fifth row in the centre column contained a typographical error where the study population birth weight incorrectly read "2050 (1 450-2 650)", rather than "2050 (1450-2650)".These errors have now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

3.
Crit Care Med ; 46(10): 1592-1599, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29965833

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Presenting symptoms in patients with sepsis may influence rapidity of diagnosis, time-to-antibiotics, and outcome. We tested the hypothesis that vague presenting symptoms are associated with delayed antibiotics and increased mortality. We further characterized individual presenting symptoms and their association with mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Emergency department of large, urban, academic U.S. hospital. PATIENTS: All adult patients with septic shock treated in the emergency department between April 2014 and March 2016. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 654 septic shock cases, 245 (37%) presented with vague symptoms. Time-to-antibiotics from first hypotension or elevated lactate was significantly longer for those with vague symptoms versus those with explicit symptoms of infection (1.6 vs 0.8 hr; p < 0.01), and in-hospital mortality was also substantially higher (34% vs 16%; p < 0.01). Patients with vague symptoms were older and sicker as evidenced by triage hypotension, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, initial serum lactate, and need for intubation. In multivariate analysis, vague symptoms were independently associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.32-3.40; p < 0.01), whereas time-to-antibiotics was not associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94-1.08; p = 0.78). Of individual symptoms, only the absence of fever, chills, or rigors (odds ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.63-4.47; p < 0.01) and presence of shortness of breath (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.23-3.15; p < 0.01) were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: More than one third of patients with septic shock presented to the emergency department with vague symptoms that were not specific to infection. These patients had delayed antibiotic administration and higher risk of mortality even after controlling for demographics, illness acuity, and time-to-antibiotics in multivariate analysis. These findings suggest that the nature of presenting symptoms is an important component of sepsis clinical phenotyping and may be an important confounder in sepsis epidemiologic studies.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/fisiopatologia , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/fisiopatologia , Estados Unidos
4.
J Perinatol ; 38(8): 1030-1038, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29740183

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the rate of monitoring alarms by alarm priority, signal type, and developmental age in a Level-IIIB Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 2,294,687 alarm messages from Philips monitors in a convenience sample of 917 NICU patients, covering 12,001 patient-days. We stratified alarm rates by alarm priority, signal type, postmenstrual age (PMA) and birth weight (BW), and reviewed and adjudicated over 21,000 critical alarms. RESULTS: Of all alarms, 3.6% were critical alarms, 55.0% were advisory alarms, and 41.4% were device alerts. Over 60% of alarms related to oxygenation monitoring. The average alarm rate (±SEM) was 177.1 ± 4.9 [median: 135.9; IQR: 89.2-213.3] alarms/patient-day; the medians varied significantly with PMA and BW (p < 0.001) in U-shaped patterns, with higher rates at lower and higher PMA and BW. Based on waveform reviews, over 99% of critical arrhythmia alarms were deemed technically false. CONCLUSIONS: The alarm burden in this NICU population is very significant; the average alarm rate significantly underrepresents alarm rates at low and high PMA and BW. Virtually all critical arrhythmia alarms were artifactual.


Assuntos
Alarmes Clínicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Alarmes Clínicos/normas , Estudos Transversais , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/normas , Monitorização Fisiológica/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telemedicina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...