Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 17(7): e0271183, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35857753

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Rising complexity of patients and the consideration of heterogeneous information from various IT systems challenge the decision-making process of urological oncologists. Siemens AI Pathway Companion is a decision support tool that provides physicians with comprehensive patient information from various systems. In the present study, we examined the impact of providing organized patient information in comprehensive dashboards on information quality, effectiveness, and satisfaction of physicians in the clinical decision-making process. METHODS: Ten urologists in our department performed the entire diagnostic workup to treatment decision for 10 patients in the prostate cancer screening setting. Expenditure of time, information quality, and user satisfaction during the decision-making process with AI Pathway Companion were recorded and compared to the current workflow. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the physician's expenditure of time for the decision-making process by -59.9% (p < 0,001) was found using the software. System usage showed a high positive effect on evaluated information quality parameters completeness (Cohen's d of 2.36), format (6.15), understandability (2.64), as well as user satisfaction (4.94). CONCLUSION: The software demonstrated that comprehensive organization of information improves physician's effectiveness and satisfaction in the clinical decision-making process. Further development is needed to map more complex patient pathways, such as the follow-up treatment of prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias da Próstata , Inteligência Artificial , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia
2.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 20250, 2021 10 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34642448

RESUMO

MRI-targeted prostate biopsy improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). However, up to 70% of PCa lesions display intralesional tumor heterogeneity. Current target sampling strategies do not yet adequately account for this finding. This prospective study included 118 patients who underwent transperineal robotic assisted biopsy of the prostate. We identified a total of 58 PCa-positive PI-RADS lesions. We compared diagnostic accuracy of a target-saturation biopsy strategy to accuracy of single, two, or three randomly selected targeted biopsy cores and analysed potential clinical implications. Intralesional detection of clinically significant cancer (ISUP ≥ 2) was 78.3% for target-saturation biopsy and 39.1%, 52.2%, and 67.4% for one, two, and three targeted cores, respectively. Target-saturation biopsies led to a more accurate characterization of PCa in terms of Gleason score and reduced rates of significant cancer missed. Compared to one, two, and three targeted biopsy cores, target-saturation biopsies led to intensified staging procedures in 21.7%, 10.9, and 8.7% of patients, and ultimately to a potential change in therapy in 39.1%, 26.1%, and 10.9% of patients. This work presents the concept of robotic-assisted target saturation biopsy. This technique has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and thus individual staging procedures and treatment decisions.


Assuntos
Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/métodos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
Oncology ; 99(12): 802-812, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34515209

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Physicians spend an ever-rising amount of time to collect relevant information from highly variable medical reports and integrate them into the patient's health condition. OBJECTIVES: We compared synoptic reporting based on data elements to narrative reporting in order to evaluate its capabilities to collect and integrate clinical information. METHODS: We developed a novel system to align medical reporting to data integration requirements and tested it in prostate cancer screening. We compared expenditure of time, data quality, and user satisfaction for data acquisition, integration, and evaluation. RESULTS: In a total of 26 sessions, 2 urologists, 2 radiologists, and 2 pathologists conducted the diagnostic work-up for prostate cancer screening with both narrative reporting and the novel system. The novel system led to a significantly reduced time for collection and integration of patient information (91%, p < 0.001), reporting in radiology (44%, p < 0.001) and pathology (33%, p = 0.154). The system usage showed a high positive effect on evaluated data quality parameters completeness, format, understandability, as well as user satisfaction. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that synoptic reporting based on data elements is effectively reducing time for collection and integration of patient information. Further research is needed to assess the system's impact for different patient journeys.


Assuntos
Gerenciamento de Dados/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Oncologia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Software , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Patologistas/psicologia , Projetos Piloto , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Radiologistas/psicologia , Relatório de Pesquisa , Suíça/epidemiologia , Urologistas/psicologia
4.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 10(11)2020 Nov 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33202680

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Opportunistic prostate cancer (PCa) screening is a controversial topic. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proven to detect prostate cancer with a high sensitivity and specificity, leading to the idea to perform an image-guided prostate cancer (PCa) screening; Methods: We evaluated a prospectively enrolled cohort of 49 healthy men participating in a dedicated image-guided PCa screening trial employing a biparametric MRI (bpMRI) protocol consisting of T2-weighted (T2w) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. Datasets were analyzed both by human readers and by a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI) software using deep learning (DL). Agreement between the algorithm and the reports-serving as the ground truth-was compared on a per-case and per-lesion level using metrics of diagnostic accuracy and k statistics; Results: The DL method yielded an 87% sensitivity (33/38) and 50% specificity (5/10) with a k of 0.42. 12/28 (43%) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3, 16/22 (73%) PI-RADS 4, and 5/5 (100%) PI-RADS 5 lesions were detected compared to the ground truth. Targeted biopsy revealed PCa in six participants, all correctly diagnosed by both the human readers and AI. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that in our AI-assisted, image-guided prostate cancer screening the software solution was able to identify highly suspicious lesions and has the potential to effectively guide the targeted-biopsy workflow.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...