A classroom-based patient case activity as a potential formative indicator of pre-advanced pharmacy practice experience readiness.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pharmacy programs must assess student readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). This study evaluated: (1) if a relationship exists between student performance on a classroom-based patient case activity (Rx Review) and (2) performance on direct patient care and perceptions of the transferability of Rx Reviews to the APPE setting. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Rx Reviews are timed, independent, prospective reviews of a patient's medical record intended to simulate pre-rounding activities common in acute and ambulatory care settings. Students complete 12 Rx Reviews across a skills laboratory course sequence. Rx Review scores were compared to performance on acute care and ambulatory care APPEs for students in the Class of 2019 using descriptive statistics for student scores and bivariate logistic regression for the association between Rx Review scores and performance outcomes on patient care APPEs. Student perceptions of the Rx Reviews were assessed through a survey. Descriptive statistics and qualitative responses were used to analyze responses to the multiple-choice survey questions and open-ended question, respectively. FINDINGS: One hundred twenty-two students participated in the study. A relationship was found between students' Rx Review scores and performance in certain direct patient care APPEs, with students performing in the bottom 50% on Rx Reviews being more likely to perform poorly on those APPEs. Over 93% of students identified Rx Reviews as at least somewhat helpful in preparing them for APPEs. SUMMARY: This study indicated that a classroom-based patient case activity could be used as a formative measure of APPE readiness.

Introducing LGBTQIA+ Patient Care to Pharmacy Students Through Laboratory-Based Exercises.

Objective. To assess the impact of novel skills-based laboratory exercises on first-, second-, and third-year pharmacy students' confidence and knowledge regarding care for people identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other (LGBTQIA+).Methods. An LGBTQIA+ lecture discussing pronouns, common terminology, health disparities, health screenings, and gender-affirming hormone therapy was presented to students. During laboratory sessions, students applied lecture topics via a learning level-specific activity. Students completed a pre- and post-activity survey assessing their knowledge, confidence, and activity experience.Results. Seventy-nine students (N=348) completed both the pre- and post-activity survey. Students' overall increase in knowledge scores was significant, with improvement in four out of six questions among each cohort. A significant increase was seen in students understanding of the role of the pharmacist, their confidence in caring for LGBTQIA+ patients, and their comfort with using appropriate terminology. Most students (92%) agreed or strongly agreed that learning about LGBTQIA+ patient care was a positive experience, while 74% agreed that additional education on LGBTQIA+ patients is needed within their pharmacy curriculum.Conclusion. After a brief skills-based laboratory course, students' knowledge and confidence in caring for LGBTQIA+ patients improved; however, students agreed that more exposure was necessary. Future studies will follow students as they progress through the curriculum to determine the impact of exposure to LGBTQIA+ content across all three didactic years.

Lessons learned: Assessing team creation by personality inventories in pharmacy students.

BACKGROUND: Proper team formation is critical for team performance and dynamics in the setting of team-based learning (TBL). Faculty should stratify students to ensure an even allocation of learner resources; however, the ideal method of team creation for TBL in pharmacy education has yet to be determined. A study aimed to assess team formation stratified by personality strengths on student performance for graded team activities, peer evaluations, and student perceptions of team dynamics compared to randomization of teams the previous semester with the same cohort. This Live and Learn piece will describe lessons learned throughout this project and research considerations for future studies on TBL team creation. IMPACT: The study design compared team stratification by strengths vs. randomization, which resulted in similar distribution of CliftonStrengths domains with a variation of two teams between the semesters. Due to homogeneity in student strengths and negligible difference in purposeful team creation by strengths vs. randomization, the study was limited in its methodology and findings. RECOMMENDATIONS: Through the description of this experience, the authors have outlined suggestions for designing studies to explore team creation methods, specifically capturing preliminary data, including a control group, and recognizing the influence of randomization. DISCUSSION: Future studies to identify the optimal method for team formation may include alternate stratification approaches and should be performed over multiple cohorts from varying institutions. It is equally plausible that randomization consistently generates teams with equitable resource distribution and team formation has no overall impact on TBL effectiveness.

Utilizing widely available podcasts to create a reflection activity for pharmacy students.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Creative strategies can be employed to encourage development of affective domain skills. The purpose of this article is to describe and assess the creation of a written self-reflection assignment utilizing podcasts. Educational activity and setting: Second year pharmacy students (N = 122) in a skills laboratory course completed two written reflections that asked them to: (1) examine and reflect on personal beliefs, biases, motivations and emotions that were challenged while listening to a podcast; and (2) identify knowledge, skills, and abilities of a pharmacist that may impact the situation presented in the podcast. Students chose from a list of podcasts curated by faculty and completed two 450 to 600-word reflections. Students completed a pre-post modified Questionnaire for Reflective Thinking (mQRT). A one-tailed, paired t-test was used to assess the mQRT. The post-questionnaire survey also included questions related to student perceptions of the reflections. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize student perceptions. FINDINGS: Out of 122 students, 116 (95.1%) completed both the pre- and post-mQRT and survey. The majority of students responded affirmatively that the reflections made them think about healthcare in a different way (91.4%) and challenged their beliefs/biases (81.9%). Students reported applying information from previous course material to the podcast concepts (75%) and vice versa (77.6%). SUMMARY: Assignments using podcasts are a unique way of engaging student learners. These assignments may help to assess affective educational outcomes and be a way to increase self-reflection, self-awareness, and metacognition in pharmacy students.

Using a Mixed Methods Approach to Explore Perceptions of Early Learners in Classroom-Based Interprofessional Education Experiences.

Objective. To explore attitudes and learning outcomes among early-level health professions students who completed foundational interprofessional education (IPE) courses. Methods. This study used a mixed methods approach to examine assessment and evaluation data from two student cohorts enrolled in two one-credit, semester-long interprofessional courses taught in fall and spring 2017. Attitudinal changes following the fall course were measured and compared in a retrospective pretest-posttest manner across student disciplines using the Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education-Revised Instrument, version 2 (SPICE-R2). Course evaluation comments and narrative reflection assignments for both courses were analyzed qualitatively via data reduction and compilation to identify evidence of learning. Results. Significant increases in positive student perceptions regarding IPE were found, with variation in the increase seen between professions following the first course. Core themes identified in the narrative reflections demonstrated student learning in interprofessional attitudes, communication, professional identity, collaborative behaviors, and systems of care. Conclusion. Student attitudes toward interprofessional learning were more positive following completion of a foundational IPE course. In addition, learning in the course shaped students' professional identities, collaborative behaviors, and understanding of systems of care. These findings suggest value in early IPE and directions for better structuring curriculum and timing of IPE.

Using immersive simulation to engage student learners in a nonsterile compounding skills laboratory course.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although immersive simulation has been applied successfully in multiple pharmacy education settings, none have been used thus far in nonsterile compounding. The objective of this study was to increase student knowledge and confidence when compounding a natural nonsterile product during an immersive simulation. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: The immersive simulation activity was taught over two weeks in a third year advanced nonsterile compounding elective. The first week focused on the extraction of an active ingredient from yarrow, a natural product. The second week immersed the students into an apocalypse simulation to compound a product using the concentrated yarrow extract for a patient who developed a dental infection, using limited resources and supplies. Knowledge and confidence changes were assessed with a pre- and post-assessment. Students' compounded nonsterile products were assessed with the course rubric. Student feedback on the activity was obtained with two open-ended questions. FINDINGS: All 30 students extracted the active ingredient from yarrow leaves and created a unique mouthwash scoring an average (SD) of 8.1 (1) out of 10 points on their graded compounded product. There was a significant increase in the overall knowledge assessment score. All student confidence assessment questions increased on the post-assessment. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive for the immersive simulation. SUMMARY: An immersive simulation improved students' overall knowledge and confidence in compounding a natural nonsterile product. Schools can utilize a similar approach to teach compounding skills for emergency preparedness.

Team teaching with pharmacy practice and pharmaceutics faculty in a nonsterile compounding laboratory course to increase student problem-solving skills.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Combining pharmaceutics and pharmacy practice into nonsterile compounding is ideal to increase problem-solving skills. The objectives of this activity were to: (1) create a nonsterile compounding activity through a team-teaching collaboration, (2) increase students' independent problem-solving skills to compound a nonsterile natural product, and (3) assess student and faculty perceptions of the learning activity. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: The activity was created, implemented, and assessed using a team-teaching technique between pharmacy practice and pharmaceutics faculty. The first week students were tasked with extraction of an active ingredient from a natural product, and the second week students independently compounded a nonsterile product using the concentrated extract. Faculty and students were asked to give their perceptions of the activity. FINDINGS: The activity has been taught to two cohorts of elective students. Students from both cohorts (n = 57) independently created a nonsterile compound, scoring an average (standard deviation) of 8.1 (1) and 8.6 (0.9) out of 10 points on their graded products for the 2018 and 2019 elective, respectively. Faculty collaboration and team-teaching adjustments to the content resulted in increased student performance (p = 0.0392). Student feedback on the activity was overwhelmingly positive. Faculty appreciated the collaborative approach and improved the course activity together. SUMMARY: A team-teaching approach created an activity that focused on elements of both pharmaceutics and pharmacy practice. Students developed problem-solving abilities by creating their own independent nonsterile compounded natural product. The collaboration between faculty was positive and well received by students.

Applying educational gaming success to a nonsterile compounding escape room.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Serious educational gaming success has not been replicated in a nonsterile compounding practical skill-based course. The objective of this study was to create a nonsterile compounding escape room to evaluate third-year professional pharmacy students' (1) knowledge of nonsterile compounding and (2) perceptions of educational escape room gaming utilized in nonsterile compounding. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: The escape room gaming environment used puzzles focused on advanced topics of nonsterile compounding. To evaluate students' knowledge, all participating students completed a pre-assessment and post-assessment mapped to the course objectives. To assess student perceptions of educational escape room gaming, a previously-validated, 12-item survey on student perceptions of educational escape room gaming was modified and administered at the end of the activity. Additional influencing factors such as success in the activity and previous escape room gaming experience were collected. FINDINGS: All thirty students completed the assessments and perception survey (100% response rate). Three out of four student teams successfully escaped the room. Students' knowledge improved or stayed the same for all questions of the assessment questions. Students perceived the escape room as helpful to their learning. Students' increased knowledge and positive perception were independent of their teams' escape success. SUMMARY: Students were actively engaged in learning during a nonsterile compounding escape room. Escape room educational games may be successfully applied to nonsterile compounding to yield increased student knowledge and positive perceptions.

Medical apps used during advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine what type of medical applications (apps) are being used by fourth-year students during advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Recent doctor of pharmacy school graduates were surveyed pertaining to their use of medical apps on APPEs, frequency of use for select apps, willingness to buy apps and at what cost, and their perceived importance on using medical apps in their pharmacy practice. The survey concluded by inquiring if medical apps should be taught in the pharmacy curriculum. FINDINGS: Ninety of 132 recent graduates responded to the survey and over 97% of the students used medical apps on their APPEs. Lexicomp®, UpToDate® and the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Risk calculator were the most frequently used applications during APPEs. Of those surveyed, 83% believe that medical apps should be taught in pharmacy school. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY: Medical apps are frequently used on APPEs. It may be prudent to teach students how to use and evaluate medical apps before going on experiences so that students and patients can get the most benefit from these tools.