Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Surg Oncol ; 18(1): 295, 2020 Nov 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33183313

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most serious complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Various factors have been reported as POPF risks, but the most serious of these is soft pancreas. To reduce POPF occurrences, many changes to the PD process have been proposed. This study evaluates short-term results of anastomosis technique for PD. METHODS: In total, 123 patients with soft pancreases who had undergone PD at Yamanashi University between January 2012 and August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We divided these patients into two groups depending on the time PD was performed: a conventional group (n = 67) and a modified group (n = 56). RESULTS: The rate of clinically relevant POPF was significantly lower in the modified group than that in the conventional group (5.4% vs 22.4%, p value < 0.001), with there being only one case of POPF in the modified group. There were no cases of POPF-related hemorrhaging in the modified group. On the third day after the operation, the amylase levels in the drainage fluid for the modified group became less than half (1696 vs 650 U/L). Multivariate analysis showed that the modified method was the independent predictors to prevent clinical POPF (p value = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel anastomosis technique for pancreatojejunostomy reduced POPF in PD, especially in cases where the patient had a soft pancreas.


Assuntos
Fístula Pancreática , Pancreaticojejunostomia , Amilases , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Drenagem , Humanos , Pâncreas/cirurgia , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Fístula Pancreática/prevenção & controle , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreaticojejunostomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Anticancer Res ; 39(12): 6923-6929, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31810963

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has recently been suggested as a new predictor of the prognosis in several carcinoma types. However, the clinical impact remains controversial in patients with ampullary carcinoma. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate other useful biomarkers for identifying poor prognosis in patients with ampullary carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with ampullary carcinoma underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with curative resection between April 2000 and April 2017. Various clinicopathological findings of the patients and their tumors were evaluated as potential prognostic factors which might enable better stratification of prognosis. RESULTS: Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, as well as other markers, was found to be a prognostic factor in patients with ampullary carcinoma. The 2-year disease-free survival percentage was significantly higher in the group with low PLR than in the high PLR group (70.2% vs. 28.6%; p=0.005). Combinational analysis of the PLR and conventional TMs enabled us to stratify prognosis of the patients more clearly than by each marker alone. CONCLUSION: PLR was a useful prognostic factor for patients with ampullary cancer. The combination of preoperative PLR and conventional TMs markers may be powerful predictive factors for postoperative prognosis in patients with ampullary carcinoma following PD.


Assuntos
Ampola Hepatopancreática/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/sangue , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/sangue , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Idoso , Ampola Hepatopancreática/cirurgia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Contagem de Plaquetas , Prognóstico , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Anticancer Res ; 39(2): 1013-1018, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30711989

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although perioperative management and operative techniques for pancreatic surgery have improved, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality following distal pancreatectomy (DP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the superiority of the reinforced stapler compared to the bare triple row stapler. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 93 patients who underwent DP at the First Department of Surgery at Yamanashi University were examined. The patients were divided into two groups according to the closure method for the pancreatic stump; the bare triple-row stapler (BTRS) group and the reinforced triple-row stapler (RTRS) group. The postoperative outcomes were then compared in terms of several clinicopathological factors between the two groups. RESULTS: Seven patients were diagnosed with Grade B/C POPF in this series. The incidence of POPF in the RTRS group was lower than that in the BTRS group (3.6% vs. 13.5%), although there was no significant difference (p=0.077). Further detailed analysis demonstrated that RTRS significantly reduced POPF compared to BTRS in obese patients with a BMI >25.0 kg/m2 (p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Reinforced triple-row staplers may reduce the incidence of severe POPF, especially in obese patients with a BMI >25 kg/m2.


Assuntos
Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreatectomia/instrumentação , Fístula Pancreática/prevenção & controle , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/efeitos adversos , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/instrumentação , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/cirurgia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Grampeadores Cirúrgicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...