Results of a phase I/II multi-center investigation of udenafil in adolescents after fontan palliation.

BACKGROUND: The Fontan operation results in a circulation that is dependent on low pulmonary vascular resistance to maintain an adequate cardiac output. Medical therapies that lower pulmonary vascular resistance may augment cardiac output and improve long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This phase I/II clinical trial conducted by the Pediatric Heart Network was designed to evaluate short-term safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy of udenafil in adolescents following Fontan. METHODS: A 5-day dose-escalation trial was conducted in five study cohorts of six subjects each (37.5, 87.5, and 125 mg daily, 37.5 and 87.5 mg by mouth twice daily). A control cohort with 6 subjects underwent exercise testing only. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded, PK samples were collected on study days six through eight, and clinical testing was performed at baseline and day five. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 36 subjects; mean age 15.8 years (58% male). There were no significant differences in subject characteristics between cohorts. No drug-related serious AEs were reported during the study period; 24 subjects had AEs possibly or probably related to study drug. Headache was the most common AE, occurring in 20 of 30 subjects. The 87.5 mg bid cohort was well tolerated, achieved the highest maximal concentration (506 ng/mL) and the highest average concentration over the dosing interval (279 ng/mL), and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. Exercise performance did not improve in any of the dosing cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Udenafil was well-tolerated at all dosing levels. The 87.5 mg bid cohort achieved the highest plasma drug level and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. These data suggest that the 87.5 mg bid regimen may be the most appropriate for a Phase III clinical trial.

Effects of citrate acid concentrate (citrasate®) on heparin N requirements and hemodialysis adequacy: a multicenter, prospective noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Citrasate®, citric acid dialysate (CD), contains 2.4 mEq of citric acid (citrate), instead of acetic acid (acetate) as in standard bicarbonate dialysate. Previous studies suggest CD may improve dialysis adequacy and decrease heparin requirements, presumably due to nonsystemic anticoagulant effects in the dialyzer. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 277 hemodialysis patients in eight outpatient facilities to determine if CD with reduced heparin N (HN) would maintain dialyzer clearance. Subjects progressed through four study periods [baseline (B): bicarbonate dialysate + 100% HN; period 1 (P1): CD + 100% HN; period 2 (P2): CD + 80% HN; period 3 (P3): CD + 66.7% HN]. The predefined primary endpoint was noninferiority (margin -8%) of the percent change in mean dialyzer conductivity clearance between baseline and P2. RESULTS: Subjects were 57.4% male, 41.7% white, 54.3% black, and 44.4% diabetic; mean age was 59 ± 14.4 years; mean time on dialysis was 1,498 ± 1,165 days; 65.7% had arteriovenous fistula, 19.9% arteriovenous graft, 14.4% catheters, and 27.8% used antiplatelet agents. Mean dialyzer clearance increased 0.9% (P1), 1.0% (P2), and 0.9% (P3) with CD despite heparin reduction. SpKt/V remained stable (B: 1.54 ± 0.29; P1: 1.54 ± 0.28; P2: 1.55 ± 0.27; P3: 1.54 ± 0.26). There was no significant difference in dialyzer/dialysis line thrombosis, post-HD time to hemostasis, percent of subjects with adverse events (AEs), or study-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS: CD was safe, effective, and met all study endpoints. Dialyzer clearance increased approximately 1% with CD despite 20-33% heparin reduction. Over 92% of P3 subjects demonstrated noninferiority of dialyzer clearance with CD and 33% HN reduction. There was no significant difference in dialyzer clotting, bleeding, or adverse events.