Which patients with microscopic disease and rhabdomyosarcoma experience relapse after therapy? A report from the soft tissue sarcoma committee of the children's oncology group.

PURPOSE: To identify which patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and microscopic residual disease (group II) are likely to not respond to therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred ninety-five patients with group II tumors received chemotherapy and 90% received radiation therapy on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-I to IRS-IV (1972 to 1997). Tumors were subgrouped depending on the presence of microscopic residual disease only (subgroup IIa), resected positive regional lymph nodes, (subgroup IIb), or microscopic residual disease and resected positive regional lymph nodes (subgroup IIc). RESULTS: Overall, the 5-year failure-free survival rate (FFSR) was 73%, and patients with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma treated on IRS-IV fared especially well (5-year FFSR, 93%; n = 90). Five-year FFSRs differed significantly by subgroup (IIa, 75% and n = 506; IIb, 74% and n = 101; IIc, 58% and n = 88; P = .0037) and treatment (IRS-I, 68%; IRS-II, 67%; IRS-III, 75%; IRS-IV, 87%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed positive associations between primary site (favorable), histology (embryonal), subgroup IIa or IIb, treatment (IRS-III/IV), and better FFSRs. Patterns of treatment failure revealed local failure to be 8%, regional failure, 4%, and distant failure, 14%. The relapse pattern noted over the course of IRS-I to IRS-IV shows a decrease in the systemic relapse rates, particularly for patients with embryonal histology, suggesting that improvement in FFSRs is primarily a result of improved chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Group II rhabdomyosarcoma has an excellent prognosis with contemporary therapy as used in IRS-III/IV, and those less likely to respond can be identified using prognostic factors: histology, subgroup, and primary site. Patients with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma are generally cured, although patients with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma or undifferentiated sarcoma, particularly subgroup IIc at unfavorable sites, continue to need better therapy.

Controversies in the management of paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: is staging retroperitoneal lymph node dissection necessary for adolescents with resected paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma?

PURPOSE: Use of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (PTRMS) is controversial and has changed over the past 2 decades. The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) required ipsilateral RPLND (IRPLND) for all patients with PTRMS treated on IRS-III (1984-91), but changed to clinical evaluation of RPLNs using computerized tomography (CT) in IRS-IV (1991 through 1997). In IRS-IV, only those patients with identified lymph node involvement on CT required surgical evaluation of the RPLNs. Nodal radiation therapy was administered only to patients with RPLNs recognized as positive; such patients received more intensive chemotherapy as well. Thus, they compared the incidence of recognized RPLN involvement using these 2 different approaches. They then analyzed patient outcome to determine whether this change in management affected outcome. METHODS: Eligible patients with group I or II PTRMS who were treated on IRS III (n = 100) or IRS IV (n = 134) were analyzed. Failure-free survival (FFS) and survival (S) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: There was a significant change in the distribution of patients with group I versus II tumors from IRS-III to IRS-IV (group I, 68% in IRS-III versus 82% in IRS-IV). This was the result of decreased node recognition when CT was used to stage RPLNs in IRS-IV and was most notable for adolescents (>10 years of age). Overall, 3-year FFS was 92% for patients treated on IRS-III and 86% for those treated on IRS-IV (P =.10), whereas survival estimates were 96% and 92%, respectively (P =.30). Adolescents were at higher risk of RPLN relapse than were children (<10 years of age) and their FFS and survival were worse, regardless of IRS protocol. Furthermore, adolescents with recognized group II tumors experienced better 3-year FFS than those with group I tumors on IRS-IV (100% versus 68%, P =.06), most likely as a result of receiving radiotherapy and intensified chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Use of only CT scan evaluation of RPLN in IRS-IV led to a decrease in identification of RPLN involvement in boys who present with localized PTRMS, and a higher rate of regional relapse as compared with IRS-III. Adolescents had much higher likelihood of RPLN disease, and they fared significantly worse than did younger children on both studies. Furthermore, adolescent boys with group I tumors experienced worse FFS than those with Group II tumors on IRS-IV, probably because some patients with group II tumors were not identified by CT imaging and thus received less effective therapy. These data suggest that adolescents should have ipsilateral RPLN dissection as part of their routine staging, and those with positive lymph nodes require intensified chemotherapy as well as nodal irradiation.

What constitutes optimal therapy for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma of the female genital tract?

BACKGROUND: Factors affecting outcome for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the female genital tract in patients treated on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) protocols I-IV were evaluated to define optimal therapy. METHODS: Records of 151 patients with tumors of the female genital tract who were treated on IRSG protocols I-IV were reviewed for details regarding chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and outcome. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival was 82%, (87% for patients with locoregional tumors). Chemotherapy was primarily vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) based. Local therapy was surgery alone in 42% of patients, surgery plus RT in 19% of patients, biopsy plus RT in 12% of patients, and biopsy without RT in 21% of patients. The rate of hysterectomy decreased from 48% in IRS-I/II to 22% in IRS-III/IV with an increase in the use of RT from 23% in IRS-II to 45% in IRS-IV and continued excellent survival. Many patients with vaginal primary tumors received delayed RT or had it omitted on later studies with excellent outcome. For patients with localized embryonal/botryoid tumors, there were no significant differences in 5-year survival among patients with tumors at different sites or among patients treated on IRS-I-IV. In patients with Group I-III tumors, 43% of deaths were from toxicity. Analysis of prognostic factors, with toxic deaths censored, revealed that an age of 1-9 years at the time of diagnosis, noninvasive tumors, and the use of IRS-II or IRS-IV treatments were associated significantly with better outcome. Patients ages 1-9 years fared best (5-year survival of 98%) and patients outside of this age range especially benefited from the intensified therapy used in IRS-III or IRS-IV (5-year survival of 67% on the IRS-I/II vs. 90% in IRS-III/IV). CONCLUSIONS: Localized female genital RMS usually is curable with combination chemotherapy, a conservative surgical approach, and the use of RT for selected patients.

Intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study-IV: results for patients with nonmetastatic disease.

PURPOSE: The study goal was to improve outcome in children with rhabdomyosarcoma by comparing risk-based regimens of surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred eighty-three previously untreated eligible patients with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma entered the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-IV (IRS-IV) (1991 to 1997) after surgery and were randomized treatment by primary tumor site, group (1 to 3), and stage (I to III). Failure-free survival (FFS) rates and survival were the end points used in comparisons between randomized groups and between patient subgroups treated on IRS-III and IRS-IV. Most patients were randomized to receive vincristine and dactinomycin (VA) and cyclophosphamide (VAC, n = 235), or VA and ifosfamide (VAI, n = 222), or vincristine, ifosfamide, and etoposide (VIE, n = 236). Patients with group 3 tumors were randomized to receive conventional RT (C-RT) versus hyperfractionated RT (HF-RT). RESULTS: Overall 3-year FFS and survival were 77% and 86%, respectively. Three-year FFS rates with VAC, VAI, and VIE were 75%, 77%, and 77%, respectively (P =.42). No significant difference in outcome was noted with HF-RT versus C-RT (P =.85 and P =.90, respectively). Overall, patients with embryonal tumors benefited from intensive three-drug chemotherapy in IRS-IV (3-year FFS, 83%). The improvement was seen for patients with stage I or stage II/III, group 1/2 disease, many of whom received VA chemotherapy on IRS-III. Patients with stage 2/3, group 3 disease had similar outcomes on IRS-III and IRS-IV. Three-year FFS for the nonrandomized patient subsets was 75% with renal abnormalities; 81% for paratesticular, group 1 cases; and 91% for group 1/2 orbit or eyelid tumors. Patients with paratesticular primaries had poorer outcomes if they were more than 10 years old (3-year FFS, 63% v 90%). Myelosuppression occurred in most patients, but toxic deaths occurred in less than 1%. CONCLUSION: VAC and VAI or VIE with surgery (with or without RT), are equally effective for patients with local or regional rhabdomyosarcoma and are more effective for embryonal tumors than therapies used previously. Younger patients with group 1 paratesticular embryonal tumors and all patients with group 1/2 orbit or eyelid tumors can usually be cured with VA chemotherapy along with postoperative RT for group 2 disease.

The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG): Major Lessons From the IRS-I Through IRS-IV Studies as Background for the Current IRS-V Treatment Protocols.

Purpose. To enumerate lessons from studying 4292 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG, 1972-1997).Patients. Untreated patients < 21 years of age at diagnosis received systemic chemotherapy, with or without irradiation (XRT) and/or surgical removal of the tumor.Methods. Pathologic materials and treatment were reviewed to ascertain compliance and to confirm response and relapse status.Results. Survival at 5 years increased from 55 to 71% over the period. Important lessons include the fact that extent of disease at diagnosis affects prognosis. Re-excising an incompletely removed tumor is worthwhile if acceptable form and function can be preserved. The eye, vagina, and bladder can usually be saved. XRT is not necessary for children with localized, completely excised embryonal RMS. Hyperfractionated XRT has thus far not produced superior local control rates compared with conventional, once-daily XRT. Patients with non-metastatic cranial parameningeal sarcoma can usually be cured with localized XRT and systemic chemotherapy, without whole-brain XRT and intrathecal drugs. Adding doxorubicin, cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide has not significantly improved survival of patients with gross residual or metastatic disease beyond that achieved with VAC (vincristine, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide) and XRT. Most patients with alveolar RMS have a tumor-specific translocation. Mature rhabdomyoblasts after treatment of patients with bladder rhabdomyosarcoma are not necessarily malignant, provided that the tumor has shrunk and malignant cells have disappeared.Discussion. Current IRSG-V protocols, summarized herein, incorporate recommendations for risk-based management. Two new agents, topotecan and irinotecan, are under investigation for patients who have an intermediate or high risk of recurrence.

Rhabdomyosarcoma and undifferentiated sarcoma in the first two decades of life: a selective review of intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study group experience and rationale for Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study V.

PURPOSE: To review the importance of prognostic factors in developing new protocols for children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four studies conducted by the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) Group from 1972 through 1991. RESULTS: Favorable prognostic factors are: (1) undetectable distant metastases at diagnosis; (2) primary sites in the orbit and nonparameningeal head/neck and genitourinary nonbladder/prostate regions; (3) grossly complete surgical removal of localized tumor at the time of diagnosis; (4) embryonal/botryoid histology; (5) tumor size < or = 5 cm; and (6) age younger than 10 years at diagnosis. The IRS-V protocols are risk-based and refine therapy by reducing exposure to cyclophosphamide and radiation therapy (XRT) in patients at low risk while adding new, active agents such as topotecan or irinotecan to the standard therapy of vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) plus XRT for patients with unfavorable histology or advanced disease. Collection of biologic specimens from patients with newly diagnosed disease continues to identify other factors that may distinguish patients with favorable features from those who need more intensive therapy. A new protocol that takes into account their previous treatment is needed for patients with recurrent disease. This program (being planned) does not include bone marrow/stem cell reconstitution because this strategy has thus far failed to improve survival rates of patients with metastases at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Better understanding of biologic differences and new, active agents are needed to improve outcome of patients with unfavorable features at presentation.

Ifosfamide and etoposide are superior to vincristine and melphalan for pediatric metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma when administered with irradiation and combination chemotherapy: a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to estimate the partial and complete response rates (CR and PR) of two novel drug pairs (vincristine and melphalan vs. ifosfamide and etoposide) and to improve overall survival of previously untreated patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to phase II window therapy consisting of vincristine and melphalan (VM-containing regimen) or ifosfamide and etoposide (IE-containing regimen). Brief window therapy (12 wks) was immediately followed-up by vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC), chemotherapy, surgery, and irradiation, with continuation of either VM or IE in patients with initial response. Major endpoints were initial CR and PR rates after the phase II window phase of therapy, failure-free survival (FFS), and survival. RESULTS: Patients who received the VM-containing regimen experienced significantly more anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and had more cyclophosphamide dose reductions. The initial PR and CR rates were not significantly different for patients treated with either regimen (VM, 74%; IE, 79%; P = 0.428). However, FFS and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were significantly better with the IE-containing regimen (FFS: 33% vs. 19%; P = 0.043; OS: 55% vs. 27%; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Although the VM-containing regimen produced a high response rate, inclusion of melphalan appeared to limit the cyclophosphamide dose that could be administered, and ultimately, this regimen was associated with a significantly worse outcome than was the IE-containing regimen. Also, the IE-containing regimen was associated with a gratifyingly high survival rate at 3 years (55%), which is significantly higher than has been observed on any previous Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group regimen for similar patients. We believe that this promising outcome indicates that this drug pair merits further randomized testing in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma.

[Rational diagnostic strategy for tuberculous lymphadenitis] . / Rationelle Abklärung der Lymphknotentuberkulose.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical, radiographic and laboratory findings in patients with tuberculous lymphadenitis and to analyse the investigational strategies which lead to the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis. METHODS: Retrospective study including 16 HIV-negative patients at the Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur with tuberculous lymphadenitis diagnosed between 1994 and 1999. RESULTS: The majority of patients presented with local symptoms and without signs of severe systemic disease. All the PPD skin tests performed were positive. Cultures for M. tuberculosis were more often positive using fine-needle aspiration than surgical biopsy. We found a lack of systematic diagnostic strategy. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest a standardised investigation procedure. When tuberculous lymphadenitis is suspected, the first diagnostic step consists of a PPD skin test and fine-needle aspiration for acid fast smear, mycobacterial culture and cytology. Surgical biopsy should be done if the cytological and mycobacteriological results of fine-needle aspiration are not diagnostic.

Soft-tissue sarcomas of the diaphragm: a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group from 1972 to 1997.

PURPOSE: To describe clinical details and outcome of children and adolescents with primary sarcomas of the diaphragm treated on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS) I through IV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 15 patients with sarcoma of the diaphragm who were entered on IRS Group protocols between 1972 and 1997. Patient ages at diagnosis ranged from 0.5 to 20 years (median, 13 yrs), and 10 were girls. Patients had chest pain, dyspnea, and/or coughing, decreased breath sounds, and occasionally hepatomegaly. RESULTS: Localized, gross residual disease after initial surgery was present in 10 patients, and five had metastases at diagnosis (pleura, 3; pericardium, 1; lungs and bones, 1). Tumor subtypes were alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in five cases, embryonal RMS in three, undifferentiated sarcoma in three, extraosseous Ewing sarcoma in three, and unclassified sarcoma in one. Treatment consisted of radiation therapy to the primary tumor and metastases when feasible, and combination chemotherapy with vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide with or without doxorubicin, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and etoposide. Ten patients achieved complete remission (67%), four obtained a partial remission, and one was improved. Five patients (33%) are continuously failure-free and alive at a median of 8.8 years from diagnosis (range, 1.1-15 yrs). However, the other 10 patients experienced relapse at 0.3 to 2 years from start of therapy (median, 1 yr). Sites of relapse were local in five, distant in three, and combined in two. Death after relapse occurred at 0.39 to 2.6 years (median, 1.6 yrs) from diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcomas of the diaphragm are generally deemed unresectable at diagnosis and/or are metastatic. Most of them are not embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas. Treatment with more effective primary chemotherapy to shrink the tumor, followed-up by surgical resection and radiation therapy, should improve the prognosis for patients with sarcomas arising in the diaphragm, especially for the majority who have localized tumors.

Late effects of therapy in 94 patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma of the orbit: Report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-III, 1984-1991.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the late complications of therapy in 94 patients with localized, primary rhabdomyosarcoma of the orbit treated on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-III protocol (1984-1991). PROCEDURE: A questionnaire was sent to the institutions that had registered 106 patients with orbital RMS on the IRS-III protocol, seeking information about vision, periocular structures, and growth and development of the 102 survivors. RESULTS: Ninety-four questionnaires were returned. The median follow-up interval was 7.6 years. The affected eye was removed from 13 patients because of local recurrence (N = 10) or other causes (N = 3). Seventy-nine of the eighty-one remaining patients had received radiation therapy. Sixty-five of these seventy-nine patients (82%) developed a cataract, and 43 of them (66%) underwent cataract surgery. Fifty-five patients (70%) had decreased visual acuity. Twenty-four patients had a dry eye, and 22 had chronic keratitis, conjunctivitis, or corneal changes. Strabismus, diplopia, retinopathy, and uveitis were uncommon. The orbit was hypoplastic in 48 of 82 patients assessed (59%). Ptosis and enophthalmos were reported in 22 patients. Decreased statural growth was noted in 13 of the 53 irradiated patients aged 3-14 years at diagnosis with sufficient data (24%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall survival rate was 96% (102/106). The eye was preserved in 86% of the patients, but vision was impaired in 70% of them. Other frequent complications were cataract, orbital hypoplasia, keratoconjunctivitis, and ptosis/enophthalmos. The current IRS-V study recommends decreasing the dose of irradiation and using conformal techniques in an attempt to minimize these complications.

Benefit of intensified therapy for patients with local or regional embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: results from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study IV.

PURPOSE: To compare failure-free survival (FFS) and survival for patients with local or regional embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma treated on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-IV with that of comparable patients treated on IRS-III. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were retrospectively classified as low- or intermediate-risk. Low-risk patients were defined as those with primary tumors at favorable sites, completely resected or microscopic residual, or orbit/eyelid primaries with gross residual disease and tumors less than 5 cm at unfavorable sites but completely resected. Intermediate-risk patients were all other patients with local or regional tumors. RESULTS: Three-year FFS improved from 72% on IRS-III to 78% on IRS-IV for patients with intermediate-risk embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (P =.02). Subset analysis revealed two groups that benefited most from IRS-IV therapy. FFS at 3 years for patients with resectable node-positive or unresectable (group III) embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma arising at certain favorable sites (head and neck [not orbit/eyelid or parameningeal] and genitourinary [not bladder or prostate]) improved from 72% on IRS-III to 92% on IRS-IV (P =.01). Similarly, 3-year FFS for patients with completely resected tumor or with only microscopic disease remaining (group I or II) at unfavorable sites improved from 71% on IRS-III to 86% on IRS-IV (P =.04). Only patients with unresectable embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (group III) at unfavorable sites had no improvement in outcome on IRS-IV (3-year FFS for IRS-III and IRS-IV, 72% and 75%, respectively; P =.31). CONCLUSION: IRS-IV therapy benefited certain subgroups of patients with intermediate-risk embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. A doubling of the intensity of cyclophosphamide (or ifosfamide equivalent) dosing per cycle between IRS-III and IRS-IV is thought to be a key contributing factor for this improvement.

Late complications of therapy in 213 children with localized, nonorbital soft-tissue sarcoma of the head and neck: A descriptive report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS)-II and - III. IRS Group of the Children's Cancer Group and the Pediatric Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: This review of children and adolescents with nonorbital soft-tissue sarcoma of the head and neck was undertaken to describe late sequelae of treatment, as manifested primarily by problems with statural growth, facial and nuchal symmetry, dentition, vision and hearing, and school performance. PROCEDURE: Four hundred sixty-nine patients entered the IRS-II and -III protocols with localized, nonorbital soft-tissue sarcomas of the head and neck from 1978 through 1987. Their overall survival rate was 53% (250/469) at 5 years. Two hundred thirteen patients were surviving relapse-free 5 or more years after diagnosis, for whom there were serial height measurements at 2 or more years after initiation of therapy. Their median age at diagnosis was 5 years; the median length of follow-up was 7 years. All received multiple-agent chemotherapy, and all but 3 received irradiation to the primary tumor volume. Sixty-eight percent of the tumors arose in cranial parameningeal sites, 22% in nonparameningeal sites, and 10% in the neck. We reviewed flow sheets submitted to the IRS Group Statistical Office to ascertain which late sequelae were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four patients (77%) had one or more problems recorded. One hundred ninety of the two hundred thirteen patients (89%) were under 15 years of age at study entry, and at follow-up 92 (48%) had failed to maintain their initial height velocity, which had decreased by more than 25 percentile points from the original value. Thirty-six of the one hundred ninety patients (19%) were receiving growth hormone injections. Hypoplasia or asymmetry of tissues in the primary tumor site was reported in 74 patients, and 13 underwent reconstructive surgery. Poor dentition or malformed teeth were noted in 61 patients. Impaired vision developed in 37 patients, owing primarily to cataracts, corneal changes, and optic atrophy. Thirty-six patients had decreased hearing acuity, and 9 were fitted with hearing aids; 5 of these 9 had received cisplatin. Thirty-five patients were noted to have problems learning in school. Four patients developed a second malignancy (two sarcomas, one carcinoma, one leukemia). CONCLUSIONS: Late sequelae affected the majority of these patients treated for soft-tissue sarcoma of the head and neck on IRS-II and -III. The potential impact of certain sequelae could be reduced by specific measures, such as surgical reconstruction and hormonal therapy. Late sequelae must be taken into account in designing future curative treatments.

What comprises appropriate therapy for children/adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma arising in the abdominal wall? A report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define clinical features and determine the best therapy for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the abdominal wall. METHODS: We examined the demographic, clinical features, therapy (especially surgical), and outcome of 34 patients. Patients received combination chemotherapy after complete surgical resection (group I, n = 14; 41%); resection with microscopic residual followed by local irradiation (RT; group II, n = 8; 24%); partial resection or biopsy only plus RT with gross locoregional residual tumor (group III, n = 4; 12%); or biopsy only plus RT with metastatic disease (group IV, n = 8; 24%). Patients with group I or group II tumors had undergone partial abdominal wall resection (ie, involved muscle only with preservation of peritoneum, n = 11) or complete abdominal wall resection (n = 7). Four additional patients had groin lesions. RESULTS: Thirty-four children or adolescents with abdominal wall RMS (about 1% of all patients) were treated on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study I (IRS-I) through IRS-IV. Overall, adolescents comprised 14 of 34 eligible patients (41%), and 10 of 14 (71%) adolescents had alveolar or undifferentiated tumors versus 8 of 20 (40%) younger children (P= .07). Failure-free survival (FFS) rate and survival rate at 5 years was 65%. Treatment outcome was poorer for patients with group III-IV tumors (P = .01), adolescents (P = .09) and patients with alveolar or undifferentiated sarcomas (P = .12). CONCLUSION: Patients with localized tumors appear to fare better if they undergo complete abdominal wall resection (long-term survival rate, 100%) versus partial resection (long-term survival rate, 62% [P = .12]).

Early history of pathology studies by the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group.

This review chronicles the series of publications that were the result of the willingness of pathologists and clinicians in the United States to share their pathologic materials and clinical data on patients who were placed on treatment protocols for rhabdomyosarcoma and related tumors over an extended period of time. The availability of this database enabled pathologists and clinicians to study a tumor type that is rare in individual institutions, but occurs in large enough numbers to produce valid conclusions not otherwise possible. Furthermore, young investigators were challenged by this opportunity and were able to spend the necessary time to make new observations that, in retrospect, helped direct protocol designs that produced significant improvement in patient survival. The key factor in this process is the surrender of individual scientific prerogatives to a small number of investigators. It is also important to recognize that the pathologist component of these series of contributions is only a part of the entire effort. It takes an organization of gifted, dedicated experts in many disciplines working together. The investigators who served on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Group over a 25-year period eminently fulfilled this.

Thoracic sarcomas in children.

OBJECTIVE: This study reviews the experience of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS) II and III with thoracic sarcomas. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracic sarcomas in children present special problems with histologic diagnosis, total resection of tumor, and local control. Previous studies have shown high rates of local and distant relapse. METHODS: Data from evaluable patients enrolled in IRS II and IRS III were reviewed. Progression-free and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and statistical differences were calculated by the log-rank test. The multivariate regression analysis of data was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients presented with thoracic sarcomas during IRS II (51 patients) and IRS III (33 patients). Of these, 76 were chest wall tumors, 3 were lung tumors, 4 were pleural tumors, and 1 arose from the heart. The average age at diagnosis was 8.5 years (range, 1 month-20.5 years). Thirty-three patients had alveolar histology, 17 had embryonal histology, and 12 had extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma, with indeterminate, undifferentiated, and pleomorphic histologies in the remaining 22 patients. Thirteen patients presented as group I (localized disease completely resected), 18 as group II (microscopic residual or nodal disease), 31 as group III (gross residual disease or biopsy only), and 22 as group IV (distant metastatic disease). Sixty patients (71%) achieved a complete response. Thirty-nine patients had a local relapse, and 22 had a distant relapse. Thirty-five patients (42%) survived with a mean follow-up of 1.8 years (range 0.7-11.7 years); 49 (58%) have died with an average survival of 1.1 years (range 0.3-11.7 years). Four patients (5%) died of infection or treatment complications. Progression-free survival was not significantly associated with histology, site, clinical group, or IRS study. Overall survival was significantly associated with clinical group, size, and local or distant recurrence, but not with histology or IRS study by univariate analysis. In a multivariate analysis, only clinical group and local and distant recurrence showed statistical significance (p < 0.002, < 0.006, and < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: As expected, outcome was better for patients with totally resected or microscopically residual tumor after resection. A higher rate of recurrence in group I versus group II,although not statistically significant, suggests that identification of margin status may be difficult, and these patients may require more intensive efforts for local control. These patients continued to have a high rate of local and distant relapse, and new strategies for preventing these are under development.

Treatment of unresectable or metastatic pediatric soft tissue sarcomas with surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to compare vincristine/actinomycin D/cyclophosphamide/adriamycin (VACA) with VACA/plus imidazole carboxamide (DTIC) (VACAD) therapy in regards to complete/partial response and event free survival rates in children and adolescents with metastatic non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) or previously chemotherapy-naive recurrent NRSTS or locally persistent gross residual tumor after surgery and radiation therapy. PROCEDURES: Between 1986 and March 1994, 75 patients entered this randomized study comparing VACA and VACAD, given at 3 week intervals. Sixty-one patients were considered eligible and received chemotherapy and radiation therapy to the primary tumor and areas of metastases. Thirty-six patients had regional unresected (Group III) disease, and 25 had metastatic disease (Group IV) at time of accession. Thirty-six patients received VACA (11 were not randomized), and 25 received VACAD. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of greater than 4 years, overall and event-free survival for all eligible patients are 30.6% and 18.4% respectively (S.E: 9.5% and 6.8%). There was insufficient evidence that DTIC offered any advantage to event free survival, but there was evidence for better outcome for patients in Group III disease in comparison to patients with Group IV disease, and for patients with a Grade 1 and 2 histology in comparison to Grade 3 lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy with VACA and VACAD were insufficient to prevent recurrent or progressive disease in children and adolescents with high stage NRSTS. The use of vincristine/ifosfamide/doxorubicin with cytokine support is under study.

Undifferentiated sarcomas of children: pathology and clinical behavior--an Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma study.

Undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma (UND-STS) is the most poorly defined tumor eligible for intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS). Recent IRS UND-STS experience was reviewed to assess the histologic characteristics and clinical behavior of undifferentiated sarcomas. Of the 1,527 patients entered on IRS-III and IRS pilot-IV, 96 had tumors classified by the IRS Pathology Committee as UND-STS. Of these, 52 had adequate histologic material for this study. After application of immunohistochemistry, 18 tumors were reclassified, mostly as embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS), primitive neuroectodermal tumors, and intraabdominal desmoplastic small found cell tumors. The remaining 34 UND-STS had a diffuse hypercellular histologic pattern made up of sheets of medium-sized cells. The tumor cells had a minimal to moderate amount of cytoplasm and a variable nuclear morphology, predominately vesicular with finely granular chromatin. Except for reactivity with antibodies against vimentin, most tumors had a negative immunohistochemical profile. The 5 year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate for patients with non-metastatic disease was 72%, a significant improvement when contrasted with patients diagnosed to have UND-STS in IRS-I and IRS-II.

Primary and metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma in the breast: neoplasms of adolescent females, a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study.

UNLABELLED: The occurrence of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) primary in or metastatic to breast has been regarded as an uncommon event, associated with an unfavorable outcome. Records of 26 patients with diagnoses of breast RMS, either primary or secondary, entered in the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) (1972-1992) were reviewed and compared with data regarding 47 similar patients in published reports. Of the 26 IRS cases, the histologic subtype was alveolar in 24, embryonal in 1, and not determined in 1. All were female with ages ranging from 11.5 to 20.2 years (median, 15.2 years; mode, 14-16 years). This compact age distribution of both primary (n = 7) and metastatic (n = 19) breast RMS was seen in previously reported series. Among the 19 cases of RMS with initial dissemination to breast, primary tumor sites, were extremity (n = 8), nasopharynx/paranasal sinuses (n = 7), and trunk (n = 4). IRS treatment was risk-based according to site and extent of disease. Four of 7 patients with primary RMS remain disease free 2.9 to 7 years post diagnosis. Among 19 patients with RMS initially metastatic to breast, including 7 in IRS clinical group IV at original diagnosis, three are disease free at 7.6, 15.7 and 17.0 years. CONCLUSIONS: primary or metastatic RMS in breast is almost confined to adolescent females having tumors with alveolar histology. Approximately one-half of the patients with primary breast disease and 15% of those with metastatic breast disease as an initial recurrence are long-term survivors.

Radiation therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: local failure risk for Clinical Group III patients on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study II.

PURPOSE: A subset of 362 pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma was selected from a total of 532 eligible IRS-II patients in Clinical Group III to assess the local and regional failure rates following radiotherapy and to determine patient, tumor, and treatment factors contributing to the risk for local and regional failure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study population was selected from all eligible IRS-II Clinical Group III patients. Excluded patients were those with "special pelvic" primary sites whose protocol management restricted radiotherapy (n = 123), and those who were removed from the study before radiotherapy was to begin, or because it was omitted (n = 47). A binary recursive partitioning model was used to identify subgroups of the remaining 362 patients at risk of local or regional failure. RESULTS: The local (only) failure rate was 17% (95% confidence interval, 13-21%), and the local (all) failure rate was 20% (95% confidence interval, 16-24%). The 5-year actuarial risk of local (all) failure was 22% (95% confidence interval, 18-27%). The risk of regional (nodal) failure was between 2% and 23%. Increasing tumor size predicted an increased local failure risk. Primary tumors located above the clavicle had a reduced risk of local failure. The binary recursive partitioning model identified a subset of patients at high risk of local failure. Those patients had primary tumors in the chest, pelvic region, extremity, or trunk, or tumors > 10 cm in diameter. Their local failure rate was 35% (compared to 15% for the remaining patients). The subset of patients at high risk for regional (nodal) failure had node involvement at diagnosis and a primary tumor originating at a site other than orbit, parameningeal, or trunk. Compliance with radiation treatment guidelines approached but did not achieve statistical significance as a predictive factor for local failure. By univariate analysis, factors not influencing local failure risk were age, race, gender, adenopathy, and histology. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy and chemotherapy administered to Clinical Group III patients entered into the IRS-II protocol produced sustained local control in most cases. Knowledge of the factors which predict an increased risk of local or regional failure will facilitate the design of new treatment strategies.

Orbital rhabdomyosarcomas and related tumors in childhood: relationship of morphology to prognosis--an Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma study.

Children and adolescents who develop rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and related sarcomas in the orbit and treated on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma protocols have had an extremely high cure rate. This study evaluates the possible relationship between their tumor morphologic subtypes and this high cure rate. The histology of tumors was re-reviewed from 229 of the 264 patients with tumors of the orbit, conjunctiva, and eyelids treated on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS I, II, III, and IV pilot protocols, and followed through July, 1992. Immunohistochemistry was applied in selected cases. Clinical correlations were done on all 264 cases including both the re-reviewed cases and those reviewed only by the IRS Pathology committee. The 5-year survival rate of 24 children with alveolar RMS was 74% (p < .001). All five infants diagnosed to have an alveolar RMS died before the age of one. Two hundred and twenty-one patients (84%) had embryonal RMS. About three-fourths of the re-reviewed embryonal RMS tumors showed only minimal rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. Thirty-one had a spindle cell RMS, two were anaplastic variants. The 5-year survival rate for patients with embryonal RMS subtypes combined was 94%, and 97% for the 144 patients with poorly differentiated embryonal RMS. In contrast, 90 of 432 IRS II patients treated for poorly differentiated embryonal RMS located in extraocular sites had a 66% survival estimate.